Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 10:1 (2023) ► pp.57–84
Metonymy in the nomenclature of Japanese traditional colors
Published online: 5 October 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.21018.tor
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.21018.tor
Abstract
This paper offers a cognitive semantic analysis of 185 nominal-nominal compounds that are used to express Japanese traditional colors (e.g., budoo-nezumi [grape-rat] ‘plum purple’). It explores the types of nominals adopted into compounds, the components’ semantic relations, and the types of metonymy involved in the meaning construction. The most frequently found semantic relations of the two components of the compounds are: (i) color of the ‘right’ blended with color of the ‘left’, where both components are construed metonymically via whole for the part (e.g., budoo-nezumi [grape-rat] ‘plum purple’ is a blend of two colors: grey, expressed by nezumi ‘rat’ (whole), standing for the animal’s hair color (part), and dark purple, expressed by budoo ‘grape’ (whole), standing for the fruit’s skin color (part)); and (ii) color of the ‘left’, expressed by the X-iro [X-color] compound (e.g., kohaku-iro [amber-color] ‘amber’). While both components in the X-iro compounds are typically used literally, overall, 65% of the 185 compounds involve metonymy (whole for the part, action for result, among others), suggesting the important role played by metonymy in meaning construction of the compounds expressing Japanese traditional colors.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and framework
- 2.1Data and method
- 2.2Construction morphology
- 2.3Conceptual metonymy
- 3.Object-based compounds
- 3.1Characteristics of the right elements
- 3.2Characteristics of left elements
- 3.3Semantic relations between the left and right elements
- 3.3.1Color of the ‘left’
- 3.3.2Color of the ‘right’ blended with color of the ‘left’
- 3.3.3Color of the ‘right’ associated with a person expressed by the ‘left’
- 3.3.4Color of the ‘right’ whose range is delimited by the specification of the ‘left’
- 4.Event-based compounds
- 4.1Characteristics of the component nominals
- 4.2Semantic relations between the left and right elements
- 4.2.1Event with a focus on a dyer
- 4.2.2Event with a focus on ‘dyeing’
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1Types of nominals of the components
- 5.2Semantic relations of the components of compounds
- 5.3Metonymy
- 5.3.1Data distribution
- 5.3.2Metonymy in the meaning construction
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (39)
Barcelona, A. (2008). The interaction of metonymy and metaphor in the meaning and form of ‘bahuvrihi’ compounds. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 208–281.
(2019). Metonymy. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics – Foundations of language (pp. 167–194). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Benczes, R. (2006). Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
(1991). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution (Updated ed). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Biggam, C. P. (2012). The semantics of colour: A historical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2015). The nominalization of Dutch particle verbs: Schema unification and second order schemas. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 20(3), 285–314.
Casson, R. W. (1994). Russett, rose, and raspberry: The development of English secondary color terms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 4(1), 5–22.
Conlan, F. (2005). Searching for the semantic boundaries of the Japanese colour term ‘ao’. Unpublished PhD. dissertation: School of Communication and Arts. Retrieved from [URL]
Evans, V., Bergen, B. K., & Zinken, J. (2007). The cognitive linguistics enterprise: An overview. In V. Evans, B. K. Bergen & J. Zinken (Eds.), The cognitive linguistics reader (pp. 2–36). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Jackendoff, R. (2016). English noun-noun compounds in conceptual semantics. In Pius ten Hacken (Ed.), The semantics of compounding (pp. 15–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jō, K. (2017). Nihon no iro no rūtsu o sagashite [Searching for the origin of Japanese colors]. Tokyo: Pie international.
Kominz, L. “Kabuki.” (2003). In D. Kennedy (Ed.), The Oxford encyclopedia of theatre and performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kӧvecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78.
Lakoff, G. (1982). Categories. In Linguistics in the morning calm. UC Berkeley. Retrieved from: [URL]
Levi, J. N. (1975). The syntax and semantics of nonpredicating adjectives in English. (PhD dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (302769915)
Mitsuo, K. & Yoshimi, O. (2004). A study on the analysis of color information of Kimono in the Edo-era [in Japanese]. Nihon Shikisai Gakkai-shi, 28(4), 220–232.
Nakae, K. (2003). Iro no namae de yomitoku nihon-shi [Understanding Japanese history through color names]. Tokyo: Seishun-shuppan.
Namiki, T., & Kageyama, T. (2016). Word structure and headedness. In T. Kageyama & H. Kishimoto (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese lexicon and word formation (pp. 201–236). Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Toward a theory of metonymy. In K. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–60). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., &. Díez Velasco, O. I. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2021). Conceptual metonymy theory revisited: Some definitional and taxonomic Issues 1. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 204–227). New York: Routledge.
Shively, D. H. (1964). Sumptuary regulation and status in early Tokugawa Japan. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 251, 123–164.
Stanlaw, J. (2007). Japanese color terms, from 400 C.E. to the present: Literature, orthography, and language contact in light of current cognitive theory. In R. E. MacLaury, G. V. Paramei & D. Dedrick (Eds.), The anthropology of color: Interdisciplinary multilevel modeling (pp. 295–318). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2010). Language, contact, and vantages: fifteen hundred years of Japanese color terms. Language Sciences, 32(2), 196–224.
Vance, T. J., & Irwin, M. (Eds.) (2016). Sequential voicing in Japanese: Papers from the NINJAL Rendaku project. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Xue, Y. (2020). A study of Chinese non-basic color terms from the perspective of cognitive semantics. In V. d. S. Sinha., A. Moreno-Núñez & Z. Tian (Eds.), Language, culture and identity – Signs of life (pp. 295–316). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
