Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 9:2 (2022) ► pp.323–340

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Neology pathways

An analysis of holonymy/meronymy and hypernymy/hyponymy

ORCiD logo with link | University of Tuscia
Published online: 6 December 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.20014.fer
Abstract
A quantitative analysis of the Italian lexicon has been made, focusing on the semantic relationships of meronymy/holonymy and hyponymy/hypernymy. The study used two lexicographical sources, together representing one of the largest structured Italian datasets. Within the theoretical debate on the ontolex interface, the aforementioned semantic relationships can be particularly interesting, assuming their closeness to crucial aspects of cognition. In this framework, the collected evidence legitimates some hypotheses on the pathways that underlie lexical and semantic neology: the direction from holonym to meronym(s) appears more productive than the opposite, suggesting that the conceptualization of an object as a whole is more likely to stimulate further conceptualization of parts, members or substance. The same top-down direction from species to genus (genera), prevails in hypernyms/hyponyms. Recurring trends of use rates, first attestation dates, and correlation rates can be exploited further to discuss the issue of cognitive economy and the ways in which it manifests itself in language.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Materials and methods
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
References (22)
References
Adamo, G., & Della Valle, V. (Eds.). (2006). Che fine fanno i neologismi? A cento anni dalla pubblicazione del Dizionario moderno di Alfredo Panzini [What happens to the neologisms? One hundred years after the publication of Alfredo Panzini’s Modern Dictionary]. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basile, G. (2001). Le parole nella mente. Relazioni semantiche e struttura del lessico [Words in the mind. Semantic relations and lexicon structure]. Roma: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, A. J., & Just, M. A. (2017). A brain-based account of “basic-level” concepts. NeuroImage, 1611, 196–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bo, C. (2015). Social constructivism of language and meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 15(1), 87–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cavallini, G. (1995). La formazione dei concetti scientifici. Senso comune, scienza, apprendimento [The formation of scientific concepts. Common sense, science, learning]. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Mauro, T. (1965). Introduzione alla semantica [Introduction to semantics]. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Grande dizionario italiano dell’uso [Great Italian Dictionary.of Use]. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Basi di conoscenze e banche dati lessicali [Knowledge bases and lexical databases], in Enciclopedia dell’italiano, Treccani, [URL]
(2010). Grande Dizionario dei Sinonimi e Contrari [Great Dictionary of Synonyms and Antonyms]. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Nuovo De Mauro [The “Nuovo De Mauro” Dictionary]. Roma: Internazionale S.p.a., [URL]
(2019). Guida all’uso delle parole [Guide to the use of words]. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreri, S. (2005). L’alfabetizzazione lessicale. Studi di linguistica educativa [Lexical literacy. Studies of educational linguistics]. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2013). Lessico e lessicologia. Atti del XLIV Congresso Internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI) (Viterbo, 27–29 settembre 2010) [Lexicon and lexicology. Proceedings of the XLIV International Study Congress of the Italian Linguistic Society (SLI)]. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuzmenka, N. (2015). Meronymic structures for names denoting parts of living beings in English. Białostockie Archiwum Językowe, 151, 291–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwak, J. A., & Yong, H. S. (2010). Ontology matching based on hypernym, hyponym, holonym, and meronym sets in WordNet. International journal of Web & Semantic Technology (IJWesT), 1(2), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prévot, L., Huang, C-R., Calzolari, N., Gangemi, A., Lenci, A., & Oltramari, A. (2010). Ontology and the Lexicon: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. B. (Eds.). (1978). Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vetere, G., Oltramari, A., Chiari, I., Jezek, E., Vieu, L., & Zanzotto, F. M. (2012). Senso comune, an open knowledge base of Italian language. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 52(3), 217–243.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vossen, P. (Ed.). (1998). Eurowordnet: A Multilingual Database with Lexical Semantic Networks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue