Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 2:2 (2015) ► pp.349360

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (16)
Bowdle, B.F., & Gentner, D. (1999). Metaphor comprehension: From comparison to categorization. In M. Hahn & S.C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of twenty-first annual conference of cognitive science society (pp. 90–95). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 411, 1–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 71, 155–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Clement, C.A. (1988). Evidence for relational selectivity in interpreting analogy and metaphor. In G.H. Bower (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 971, 3–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993). How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 401–424). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M.S., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 361, 50–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Manfredi. D.A., & McGlone, M.S. (1997). Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create categories. In T.B Wards, S.M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual metaphors and processes (pp. 326–350). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Newsome, M.R., & Goldvarg, Y. (1997). Filtering out irrelevant material during metaphor comprehension. In M.G. Shafto & P. Langely (Eds.), Proceeding of 19th annual conference of the cognitive society (p. 932). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Inhibition of the literal: Filtering metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Metaphor & Symbol, 161, 277–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, L., & Estes, Z. (2005). Metaphor comprehension as attributive categorization. Journal of Memory and Language, 531, 110–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keysar, B., & Glucksberg, S. (1992). Metaphor and communication. Poetics Today, 131, 632–658. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, G.L. (1997). Polysemy and the creation of novel word meanings. In T.B. Wards, S.M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 235–265). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Y. (1992). Metaphors and categories. Poetics Today, 131, 771–794. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tourangeau, R., & Rips, L. (1991). Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 301, 452–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (20)

Cited by 20 other publications

Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Jiehui Hu & Hassan Banaruee
2026. Metaphor as a process of propositional or imagistic source-target interaction: A review of five theories. New Ideas in Psychology 80  pp. 101217 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid
2025. Metaphorical emergence through propositional and imagistic modes of metaphor processing. Language & Communication 105  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Danyal Farsani & Hassan Banaruee
2025. How Gestural Representation of Metaphor Schema Facilitates Metaphor Comprehension in Congruent Gesture-Aligned Conditions: An Embodied Metaphor Processing Perspective. Sage Open 15:4 DOI logo
Razpurker-Apfeld, Irene
2025. Seeing and thinking groups: embodied foundations of perceptual and social structuring. Frontiers in Language Sciences 4 DOI logo
Banaruee, Hassan, Danyal Farsani, Omid Khatin-Zadeh & Zahra Eskandari
2024. Metaphors across cultures. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 60:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Danyal Farsani, Zahra Eskandari, Lin Li & Hassan Banaruee
2024. Prime effects in metaphor comprehension: comparing congruent and opposite schematic primes. Frontiers in Psychology 15 DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Zahra Eskandari, Florencia Reali, Hassan Banaruee & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2023. Are metaphorical classes essentially abstract?. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Mirko Farina, Babak Yazdani-Fazlabadi, Jiehui Hu, David Trumpower, Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos & Danyal Farsani
2023. The Roles of Gestural and Symbolic Schematizations in Inhibition as a Component of Executive Functions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 57:3  pp. 950 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Jiehui Hu, Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos & Danyal Farsani
2023. The impact of gestural representation of metaphor schema on metaphor comprehension. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:1  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Torrens-Urrutia, Adrià, Maria Dolores Jiménez-López & Susana Campillo-Muñoz
2023. Dealing with Evaluative Expressions and Hate Speech Metaphors with Fuzzy Property Grammar Systems. Axioms 12:5  pp. 484 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid & Danyal Farsani
2022. The understanding of abstract concepts: a perspective from distributed models of conceptual representation. Discover Psychology 2:1 DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid & Hooshang Khoshsima
2021. Homo-schematic Metaphors: A Study of Metaphor Comprehension in Three Different Priming Conditions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50:4  pp. 923 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Hassan Banaruee, Zahra Eskandari & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2019. Isomorphism: Abstract and Concrete Representations. Activitas Nervosa Superior 61:3  pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Zahra Eskandari, Yousef Bakhshizadeh-Gashti, Sedigheh Vahdat & Hassan Banaruee
2019. An algebraic perspective on abstract and concrete domains. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2  pp. 354 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Hooshang Khoshsima, Nahid Yarahmadzehi & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2019. The Impact of Metaphorical Prime on Metaphor Comprehension Processes. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:3  pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Gathigia, Moses Gatambuki, Ruiming Wang, Manqiong Shen, Carlos Tirado, Oksana Tsaregorodtseva, Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Ricardo Minervino & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2018. A cross-linguistic study of metaphors of death. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:2  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Hooshang Khoshsima & Nahid Yarahmadzehi
2018. Suppression from the Perspective of Distributed Models of Conceptual Representation. Activitas Nervosa Superior 60:3-4  pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Nahid Yarahmadzehi & Hassan Banaruee
2018. A Neuropsychological Perspective on Deep or Abstract Homogeneity Among Concretely Different Systems. Activitas Nervosa Superior 60:2  pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Banaruee, Hassan, Hooshang Khoshsima, Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Afsane Askari & Mireille Besson
2017. Suppression of semantic features in metaphor comprehension. Cogent Psychology 4:1  pp. 1409323 ff. DOI logo
Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando, Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Babak Yazdani-Fazlabadi, Carlos Tirado & Eyal Sagi
2017. Embodied concept mapping. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:2  pp. 164 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue