Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 2:2 (2015) ► pp.257–288

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Cognitive model of GHEIRAT in Persian

 | Eötvös Loránd University (Hungary)
Published online: 3 March 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.2.2.03bak
GHEIRAT seems to be a complex emotion in Iranian men and women with a variety of contextual meanings including, jealousy, chivalry, courage, and protecting one’s nâmus ‘female family members’. GHEIRAT may be defined as a monitoring device or alarm system in the mind of Iranians. The cognitive linguistic analysis of the conceptual domains interacting with GHEIRAT indicates that the GHEIRAT concept operates to protect one’s values against threat, insult, and injury, provide assistance to the Other, and aid the Self in accomplishing goals as a supplementary force. Moreover, the paper comes to the conclusion that in Iranian culture, the cultural model of GHEIRAT is largely constituted by conceptual metaphors (THE OTHER IS A POTENTIAL OPPONENT, GHEIRAT IS A PHYSICAL SUPPLEMENTARY FORCE), conceptual metonymy (CAUSE FOR EFFECT) and related key concepts (ÂBERU ‘face’, NÂMUS ‘one’s female family members and the sanctity associated with them’, MAHRAMIAT ‘the legitimate physical and emotional intimacy between men and women’). Furthermore, based on Kövecses’s (2000) account of emotion concepts, it is revealed that GHEIRAT fulfills its functions indirectly through acting as a cause for other emotions and feelings such as ANGER, HATRED, JEALOUSY, and SELFLESSNESS.
References (26)
Assadi, R. (1982). Conflict and its management: Iranian style. Anthropological Linguistics, 24(2), 201–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aujla, W., & Gill, Aisha. K. (2014). ‘Honour’ killing in Canada: An extreme form of domestic violence? International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 9(1), 153–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeman, W.O. (1976). Status, style, and strategy in Iranian interaction. Anthropological Linguistics, 18(7), 305–322.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1986). Language, status, and power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eshaghi, S.H. (2009). Gohar e efaf: Pazhuheshi darbareye hejab [The pearl of chastity: A survey on the hijab]. Ghom: Bustan e Ketab.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, D.E. (2008). The personal is patrilineal: Namus as sovereignty. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 151, 317–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (1995). Metaphor and the folk understanding of anger. In J.A. Russell et al. (Eds.), Everyday conceptions of emotion (pp. 49–71). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Metaphor and emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Metaphor in culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Unpublished manuscript. Metaphoric and metonymic conceptualization of the other.
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutz, C. (1987). Goals, events, and understanding in Ifaluk emotion theory. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 290–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meeker, M.E. (1976). Meaning and society in the Near East: Examples from the Black Sea Turks and the Levantine Arabs. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 7(2), 243–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, G. (1996). Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: Texas University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, N., & Holland, D. (1987).Culture and cognition. In D. Holland, & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 3–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2003).On cultural conceptualizations. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(3), 187–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Conceptualization of del ‘heart-stomach’ in Persian. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Culture, body, and language: Conceptualization of internal body organs across cultures and languages (pp. 247–265). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Cultural conceptualizations in English as an International language. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), English as an International language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues (pp. 242–253). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Cultural conceptualization in learning English as an L2: examples from Persian-speaking learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 90–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shore, B. (1996).Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Japanese key words and core cultural values. Language in Society, 20(3), 333–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key words. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Borys, Dmytro
2025. CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR OF FEAR IN ENGLISH SLANG. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Khanpoor-Siahdarka, Mahsa & Mohammad Reza Masnavi
2025. Assessment of Community Gardens’ role in mitigating air pollution and expanding social opportunities: Lessons from a neighborhood with limited green infrastructure in Tehran city. Energy Nexus 17 ► pp. 100363 ff. DOI logo
Torbati, Atlas
2025. Hegemonic Islamic masculinities: Contextualising a new form of hegemonic masculinities in the Iranian diaspora in the UK. Irish Journal of Sociology 33:3 ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Abbaszadeh, Elnaz & Ali Dabbagh
2024. “You have no right!”. International Journal of Language and Culture 11:2 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Ghazi, Sara
2024. Unpacking the Conceptualizations of Hayâ. In The Handbook of Cultural Linguistics [Springer Handbooks in Languages and Linguistics, ], ► pp. 465 ff. DOI logo
Farhoudi, Fateme, Valentin Artounian & Luc Michel
2023. Culture, Gender, and Aggression in Psychodynamic Group Therapy: A Case of a Male-Only Group with Female Leaders in Iran. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 73:4 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Izadi, Ahmad
2023. On Face and Face-Work in Iran: From Etic Theories to Emic Practices. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 24:3 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Zahedi, Farshad
2022. Adapting a Persian Magic Realist Novel on Screen: The Case of Women Without Men . Adaptation 15:3 ► pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
Bakhtiar, Mohsen
2019. A cognitive linguistic view of control mechanism in Iranian culture. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:2 ► pp. 465 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue