Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 1:1 (2014) ► pp.22–54
National identity: Conceptual models, discourses and political change
‘Britishness’ in a social cognitive linguistics
Published online: 5 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.1.1.02har
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.1.1.02har
Cognitive Linguistics has demonstrated the applicability of a conceptual approach to the understanding of political issues, cf. Lakoff (2008) and many others. From a different perspective, critical discourse analysis has approached political concepts with a focus on issues involving potentially divisive features such as race, class, gender and ethnic identity. Although discourses are not identical to conceptual models, conceptual models are typically manifested in discourse, and discourses are typically reflections of conceptualizations, a theme explored e.g. in Hart and Lukes (2007). As argued in Harder (2010), however, both the analytic stance of critical discourse analysis (based on the hermeneutics of suspicion), and the cognitivist stance of Lakoff (2008) are too narrow: The understanding of political language requires a wider framework of social cognitive linguistics. Essential features of such a framework are a basis in collaborative intersubjectivity and the inclusion of causal factors in the social domain that impinge on conceptualization. This enables politically salient conceptualizations to be understood in the light of different types of input to conceptualization, rather than solely in terms of conceptual models or discourses. This is especially important in cases that involve conflictive political issues such as national and ethnic identity. The article reports on a historical project with a linguistic dimension in my department (PI Stuart Ward, cf. Ward 2004), which aims to throw light on the interplay between conceptual, geopolitical and social factors in shaping the ongoing change in the role and nature of ‘Britishness’. A key question for this article is: What are relations between conceptual models and macro-social, causal factors in shaping the intersubjective status of Britishness?
References (57)
Anderson, Benedict. (2006) [1983]. Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, Revised Edition. London: Verso.
Ashton, S.R, Dridge, C., & Ward, S. (Eds.). (2010). Australia and the United Kingdom 1960-1975. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and trade.
Belich, J. (2009). Replenishing the Earth: The settler revolution and the rise of the anglo-world, 1783-1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Blaxill, L. (2013). Quantifying the language of British politics, 1880–1910. Historical Research, 86(232), 313–341.
Champion, C.P. 2010. The strange demise of British Canada. The Liberals and Canadian Nationalism, 1964-1968. Montreal etc: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Condor, S. (1996). Unimagined community? Some social psychological issues concerning English National Identity. In G.M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change (pp. 41–67). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
. (2009). Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 395–420). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Curran, J., & Ward, S. (2010). The unknown nation: Remaking Australia in the wake of empire. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Diamond, J. (2012). The world until yesterday. What can we learn from traditional societies? London: Allan Lane
Durkheim, É. (1897). Le suicide, étude de sociologie, 8th edition, 1974. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Also Retrievable at [URL]
Eriksen, J-M., & Stjernfelt, F. 2012. The democratic contradictions of multiculturalism. New York: Telos.
Foucault, Michel. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. [1989: English translation by A.M. Sheridan Smith]. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Geeraerts, D. (2003). Cultural models of linguistic standardization. In R. Dirven, R. Frank & M. Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought. Ideology, metaphors and meanings (pp. 25–68). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. London : Lawrence and Wishart.
Harder, P. (2003). The status of linguistic facts. Rethinking the relation between cognition, social institution and utterance from a functional point of view. Mind and Language, 18(1), 52–76
. (2010). Meaning in mind and society. A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. [Cognitive Linguistics Research 41]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hart, C. (Ed.). (2011). Critical discourse studies in context and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
House, J., & Thompson, A. 2013. Decolonisation, space and power: Immigration, welfare and housing in Britain and France, (1945-1974), chapter 10. In A. Thompson (ED.), Writing Imperial Histories (pp. 357–398). Manchester University Press.
Keaton, T.D. (1999). Muslim girls and the ’Other France’: An examination of identity construction. Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 5(1), 47–64.
. (1993).The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (1996). Moral politics. What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
. (2006). Whose Freedom? The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
. (2008). The Political Mind. Why You Can’t Understand 21st-Century American Politics with an 18th-Century Brain. London: Viking.
L’Hôte, É. (2012). Breaking up Britain? Métaphores et discours sur la dévolution au Royaume-Uni. In J. Perrez & M. Reuchamps (Eds.), Les relations communautaires en Belgique: Approches politiques et linguistiques (pp. 161–189). Louvain-la-Neuve: L’Harmattan/Academia.
Lowry, D. (2010). Rhodesia 1890-1980. The lost dominion. In D. Lowry & R. Bickers (Eds.), Settlers and expatriates, (pp. 112–149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maalej, Z.A. (2013). Review of Christopher Hart (ed.) Critical discourse studies in context and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 385–392.
Mitterauer, M., & Sieder, R. (1982). The European family: Patriarchy to partnership from the middle ages to the present. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nielsen, J. Ø. (2012). ‘The Implosion of empire’ and Scottish nationalism. Master’s thesis, University of Copenhagen.
. (2013). The emergence of the concept of ‘decolonization’ in British parliamentary debate. MS., University of Copenhagen.
Nielsen, J. Ø., & Ward, S. Forthcoming. ‘Cramped and restricted at home’. Scottish separatism at empire’s end. MS., University of Copenhagen.
Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2013). A serious LAT relationship or a crazy machine? Metaphors in citizens’ perception of Belgian federalism. MS., University of Liege (ULg, Belgium) and Université catholique de Louvain (UCL, Belgium).
Reynolds, D. (1995). Rich relations. The American occupation of Britain 1942-45. London: HarperCollins Publishers.
Richerson, P.J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone. How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1041, 573–605.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Ward, S. (Ed.). (2001). British culture and the end of empire. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
. (2004). The end of empire and the fate of Britishness. In H. Brocklehurst & R. Phillips (Eds.), History, nationhood and the question of Britain (pp. 242–258). London: Palgrave/Macmillan.
. (2008). Imperial identities abroad. In S. Stockwell (Ed.), The British empire. Themes and perspectives (pp. 219–243). Oxford: Blackwell.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Stanojević, Mateusz-Milan & Ljiljana Šarić
2019. Metaphors in the discursive construction of nations. In Metaphor, Nation and Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 82], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.