Article In: Metonymic Thinking All the Way Down: From discourse to the lexicon, and beyond
Edited by Carmen Portero-Muñoz, Antonio Barcelona and Almudena Soto Nieto
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 13:1] 2026
► pp. 245–273
Section 4. Metonymy in sign languages and dance
Meaning construal in contemporary dance
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper aims at illustrating the role of conceptual metonymy
and conceptual metaphor in the meaning construal of the philosopher Alan Watts’s
“The Beauty of Nothingness” by the Portuguese choreographer and dancer Tiago
Coelho. As Irene Mittelberg ( (2019). Visuo-kinetic signs are inherently metonymic: How embodied metonymy motivates forms, functions, and schematic patterns in gesture. Frontiers in Psychology, 101, Article 254. : 10) claims: “Generally speaking, there are innumerable latent
contiguity relations out there in the world, in our imagination, and in our
embodied knowledge structures that may be operationalized when we are reasoning
and communicating.” In line with this perspective, the research presented here
will focus on the contiguity relations between the dancer’s internal world and
his communication of the world described by Watts. I fully endorse Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. claim that
aesthetics lies at our very capacity to make meaning and that art is simply an
exemplary manifestation of this ability. As he points out, humans are sentient
beings, explorers of space, other entities, their inner life. In line with these
ideas, the present analysis of the contemporary dance choreography is an attempt
at approaching the choreographer’s exemplary manifestation of meaning making as
well as describing the underlying resources, which he as a human being has and
puts at the service of his own construal as well as the construal that reaches
the audience via his body.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data analysis
- 3.Concluding remarks
- Notes
References
References (19)
Barcelona, A. (2000b). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207–278). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2011) Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.) Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a consensus view. John Benjamins. Amsterdam/Philadelphia (pp. 7–57)
(2018). General description of the metonymy database in the Córdoba project, with particular attention to the issues of hierarchy, prototypicality, and taxonomic domains. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (pp. 27–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2024). Metonymy in grammar and discourse comprehension: Five case studies. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Fillmore, C. J. (1977). The Case for Case Reopened. In Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 81). Grammatical Relations. Academic Press, Inc.
(1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.
Gallese, V. (2019). Embodied simulation. Its bearing on aesthetic experience and the dialogue between neuroscience and the humanities. Gestalt Theory, 41(2), 113–127.
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.
Leigh Foster, S. (1986). Reading dancing: Bodies and subjects in contemporary American dance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mittelberg, I. (2014). Gestures and iconicity. In: C. Müller, J. Bressem, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.). Body — Language — Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (38.21). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 1712–1732
(2019). Visuo-kinetic signs are inherently metonymic: How embodied metonymy motivates forms, functions, and schematic patterns in gesture. Frontiers in Psychology, 101, Article 254.
Müller, C.. 2004. Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? In Cornelia Müller & Roland Posner (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler
