Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 11:2 (2024) ► pp.440–458

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

A cognitive modelling of translation

A construal-based perspective

 | Southwest University
Published online: 10 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00125.tao
Abstract
This paper attempts to usher in a cognitive linguistic theory into (cognitive) translation studies and offers a theoretical model of translation from the construal perspective. In this construal-based theory, translators are modelled as construers which are featured by subjectivity, and meaning decoding and encoding in translation are equated with construal which is manifested at two levels. At the cognitive level, translators construe the source text whereas at the linguistic level the construal established by the translators is packaged in the target language. Translation process involves translators’ construal operations such as perspective, selection, prominence and dynamicity, and imagination. Since construal is situated in context, it is impossible to recreate the construals of the source text author but optimal construal can be envisioned if the situated contexts for the source text author(s) as well as that for the target text are best accommodated.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The construal theory
    • 2.1Construal characterized
    • 2.2Construal operations
  • 3.Translators as construers
  • 4.Meaning decoding/encoding in translation as construal
  • 5.Construal operations in translation process
  • 6.Equivalence vs. optimal construal
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (37)
References
Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1965). A linguistic theory of translation: An essay in applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2007). A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halverson, S. L. (2007). A cognitive linguistic approach to translation shifts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 105–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Implications of cognitive linguistics for translation studies. In A. Rojo & I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and translation: Advances in some theoretical models and applications (pp. 33–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1959). On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. A. Brower (Ed.), On translation (pp. 232–239). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, W. (1979). Einführung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft [Introduction to translation studies]. Heidelberg Wiesbaden: Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Equivalence in translation theory. In A. Chesterman (Ed.), Readings in translation theory (pp. 99–104). Helsinki: Finn Lectura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol I: Theoretical prerequisite. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Cognitive grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 421–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Construal. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics – Foundations of Language (pp. 140–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muñoz Martín, R. (2010). On paradigms and cognitive translatology. In G. M. Shreve & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and cognition (pp. 169–187). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Looking toward the future of cognitive translation studies. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The handbook of translation and cognition (pp. 555–572). New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nida, E. A. (1964). Towards a science of translating: With special reference to principles and procedures involved in Bible translating. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1969). The theory and practice of translation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Exploring translation theories. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojo, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Cognitive linguistics and translation: Advances in some theoretical models and applications. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabakowska, E. (1993). Cognitive linguistics and poetics of translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). The relation of grammar to cognition. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 165–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Vol I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2007). Construal and perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wen, X. (2007). yǔyì, rènzhī yǔ shíjiě [Meaning, cognition and construal]. Foreign Language Research, (6), 35–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wen, X., & Xiao, K. (2019). rènzhīfānyìxué [Cognitive translatology]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiao, K. (2021). rènzhīfānyìxué de míng yǔ shí [The name and nature of cognitive translation studies]. Studies in Language, Translation & Cognition (1), 102-121+168-169.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (1984). hànyīng duìzhào tángshī yībǎiwǔshí shǒu [One hundred and fifty Tang-dynasty poems in Chinese and English compared]. Xian: Shaanxi Peoples’ Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). xǔyuānchōng yì táoyuānmíng shīxuǎn [Selected poems of Tao Yuanming]. Beijing: China Translation & Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Z. (1986). Lǐbái jìngyèsī yīngyì shǎngxī [Appreciation of Li Bai’s quatrain “ Quiet Night Thoughts” In English translation]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (4), 15–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue