Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 12:1 (2025) ► pp.52–69

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The effect of mode of presentation on EFL learners’ cognitive processing of ambiguous relative clauses

ORCiD logo with link | University of Gonabad
Published online: 2 June 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00124.rah
Abstract
The present study aimed to identify whether different modes of presentation have an effect on the cognitive processing of ambiguous relative clauses (RCs) in English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners. The study used different online modes of presentation, in which the ambiguous RCs were presented in different conditions to the participants. The participants were 135 L1-Persian EFL learners who were randomly assigned to three modes of presentation, namely online (n = 45), timed online (n = 45), and self-paced online (n = 45). The stimuli used in the study were structurally ambiguous RCs. The participants were asked to read the sentences appearing on the laptop monitor one by one and decide whether the RC was related to any of the noun phrases. Using the software PsychoPy, error rates were measured to determine the effect of mode of presentation on the EFL learners’ cognitive processing of ambiguous RCs. The data revealed that the mode of presentation had a significant effect on their cognitive processing of ambiguous RCs. The study results underscore the notion that mode of presentation has a strong effect on cognitive processing of ambiguous RCs in second language education.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Theoretical foundation
    • 2.2The effect of mode of presentation on RC processing
  • 3.Research question
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Stimuli
    • 4.3Data collection
    • 4.4Data analysis
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (60)
References
Ahmadian, M. J. (2012). The effects of guided careful online planning on complexity, accuracy and fluency in intermediate EFL learners’ oral production: The case of English articles. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 129–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahmadian, M. J., Tavakoli, M., & Dastjerdi, H. V. (2015). The combined effects of online planning and task structure on complexity, accuracy, and fluency of L2 speech. The Language Learning Journal, 43(1), 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akal, T. (2021). Recency preference in ambiguous relative clause attachment in Turkish. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(S1), 139–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arabmofrad, A., & Marefat, H. (2008). Relative Clause Attachment Ambiguity Resolution in Persian. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 29–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baleghizadeh, S., & Shahri, M. N. N. (2017). The effect of online planning, strategic planning and rehearsal across two proficiency levels. The Language Learning Journal, 45(2), 171–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bidaoui, A., Foote, R., & Abunasser, M. (2016). Relative clause attachment in native and L2 Arabic. International Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 2(2), 75–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. (1980). Some constraints on models of language production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 140–153). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffarra, S., Molinaro, N., Davidson, D., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 511, 31–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Donaldson, B., Edmonds, A. C., Fultz, A. L., & Petrush, R. A. (2008). Syntactic and prosodic computations in the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by English-French learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 453–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desmet, T., De Baecke, C., Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., & Vonk, W. (2006). Relative clause attachment in Dutch: On-line comprehension corresponds to corpus frequencies when lexical variables are taken into account. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(4), 453–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desmet, T., & Declercq, M. (2006). Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 610–632. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dinçtopal-Deniz, N. (2010). Relative clause attachment preferences of Turkish L2 speakers of English: Shallow parsing in the L2?. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing (pp. 27–64). New York: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Y., Wen, Y., Zeng, X., & Ji, Y. (2015). Exploring the cause of English pronoun gender errors by Chinese learners of English: Evidence from the self-paced reading paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(6), 733–747. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E. (2003). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4), 529–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N. (2007). The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 101–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, C., Marinis, T., & Clahsen, H. (2003a). Children’s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 11(3), 127–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, C., Roberts, L., Marinis, T., & Gross, R. (2003b). The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 453–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández, E. M. (1999). Processing strategies in second language acquisition: Some Preliminary Results. In E. C. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 217–239). New York: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Relative clause attachment in bilinguals and monolinguals. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 187–215). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6(4), 291–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C. (2002). An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 217–236). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghavamnia, M., Tavakoli, M., & Esteki, M. (2013). The effect of pre-task and online planning conditions on complexity, accuracy and fluency on EFL learners’ written production. Porta Linguarum, 201, 31–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition, 59(1), 23–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H., Guzzo, N. B., & White, L. (2020). Parsing ambiguous relative clauses in L2 English: Learner sensitivity to prosodic cues. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(1), 83–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grillo, N., & Costa, J. (2014). A novel argument for the universality of parsing principles. Cognition, 1331(11), 156–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Havik, E., Roberts, L., Van Hout, R., Schreuder, R., & Haverkort, M. (2009). Processing subject-object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning, 59(1), 73–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hemforth, B., Fernandez, S., Clifton Jr, C., Frazier, L., Konieczny, L., & Walter, M. (2015). Relative clause attachment in German, English, Spanish and French: Effects of position and length. Lingua, 166(A), 43–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2014). Working memory effects in the L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 21(3), 250–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iudina, M. V., & Fedorova, O. V. (2009). Syntactic ambiguity resolution: Priming and self-priming effects. Paper from Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies, 8(15), 554–569.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, C. N., & Roberts, L. (2010). Animacy affects the processing of subject-object ambiguities in the second language: Evidence from self-paced reading with German second language learners of Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(4), 671–691. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jegerski, J., Keating, G. D., & VanPatten, B. (2016). On-line relative clause attachment strategy in heritage speakers of Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(3), 254–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A., & Koike, C. (2008). Default prosody and relative clause attachment in Japanese. Japanese-Korean Linguistics, 131, 5–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karimi, M. N., Samadi, E., & Babaii, E. (2021). Relative clause attachment ambiguity resolution in L1-persian learners of L2 English: The effects of semantic priming and proficiency. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(3), 153–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2013). Sentence complexity and working memory effects in ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(5), 393–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Working memory effects on L1 and L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses by Korean L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 33(3), 365–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, S. H., & Kim, J. H. (2012). Frequency effects in L2 multiword unit processing: Evidence from self-paced reading. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 831–841. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J. F., Malovrh, P. A., Doherty, S., & Nichols, A. (2022). A self-paced reading (SPR) study of the effects of processing instruction on the L2 processing of active and passive sentences. Language Teaching Research, 26(6), 1133–1157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malakooti, N., Rezai, M. J., & Samavarchi, L. (2020). Ambiguity resolution of English relative clauses by Persian learners of English. Journal of New Advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 220–258.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marefat, H., & Farzizadeh, B. (2018). Relative clause ambiguity resolution in L1 and L2: Are processing strategies transferred?. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 125–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marefat, H., & Meraji, M. (2005). Parsing preferences in structurally ambiguous relative clauses: L1 vs. L2. Journal of Humanities, 12(1), 111–126.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marefat, H., Samadi, E., & Yaseri, M. (2015). Semantic priming effect on relative clause attachment ambiguity resolution in L2. Applied Research on English Language, 4(2), 78–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(5), 861–904. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. C., Brysbaert, M., Grondelaers, S., & Swanepoel, P. (2000). Modifier attachment in DutchDutch: Testing aspects of construal theory. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 493–516). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, H.-Y., Schimke, S., & Felser, C. (2015). Referential context effects in non-native relative clause ambiguity resolution. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(3), 298–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4), 501–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 21, Article 10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pliatsikas, C., & Marinis, T. (2013). Processing of regular and irregular past tense morphology in highly proficient second language learners of English: A self-paced reading study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(5), 943–970. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahmani Doqaruni, V. (2023). The effect of age on cognitive processing of ambiguous relative clauses in second language education. Lingue e Linguaggio, 22(1), 3–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, L. (2016). Self-paced reading and L2 grammatical processing. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 58–73). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, L., & Liszka, S. A. (2013). Processing tense/aspect-agreement violations on-line in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 29(4), 413–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodriguez, G. (2004). Relative clause attachment preferences in second language learners’ parsing performance. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 10(1), 157–169.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 64–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabari, M. A. (2016). The effects of planning time on complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexical variety in L2 descriptive writing. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 11, Article 10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taheri, M., Davodi, M., & Nasiri, F. (2015). The processing of ambiguous sentences by Iranian EFL learners: A study of relative clause attachment. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 36(3), 1096–1105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traxler, M. J. (2007). Working memory contributions to relative clause attachment processing: A hierarchical linear modeling analysis. Memory & Cognition, 351, 1107–1121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachisnke, I. (2017). Validating grammaticality judgement tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 59–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., & Leeser, M. J. (2012). Missing verbal inflections as a representational problem: Evidence from self-paced reading. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(2), 109–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue