Article published In: Cognitive Approaches to Mind, Language, and Society: Theory and description
Edited by Mario Serrano-Losada and Daniela Pettersson-Traba
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1] 2024
► pp. 130–157
What frequencies tell us of the foodstuffs used as source domain to conceptualize attractive people in Peninsular Spanish
Published online: 6 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00115.gar
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00115.gar
Abstract
This paper offers a study of the foodstuffs used by speakers of Peninsular Spanish when referring to an attractive
individual. Two online forums were scanned to automatically search for linguistic realizations of the metaphor an attractive
individual is appetizing food. A corpus of 860 short texts was compiled, which contains the food terms used in context.
The frequency distribution of the type of food and the variable of gender was measured. Results indicate a preference to exploit
the metaphor through salty food products and that the foodstuffs used are highly dependent on the variable of gender. Contrary to
previous studies (e.g., Hines, C. (2000). Rebaking
the pie: The woman as dessert metaphor. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang & L. A. Sutton (Eds.), Reinventing
identities: The gendered self in
discourse (pp. 145–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press; Rodríguez, I. L. (2007). The
representation of women in teenage and women’s magazines: Recurring metaphors in
English. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad
Complutense, 151, 15–42., Rodríguez, I. (2008). Are
women really sweet? An analysis of the woman as dessert metaphor in the English and Spanish written
press. Babel–AFIAL: Aspectos de Filoloxía Inglesa e
Alemá, (32), 179–195.), the frequency of sweets and desserts is not
higher with female referents. The findings do not agree with prior assumptions about the foodstuffs used in Peninsular Spanish to
conceptualize attractive people and the cultural stereotypes associated with them.
Keywords: food, metaphor, gender, cultural stereotypes, Peninsular Spanish
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.appetizing food to conceptualize attractive individuals
- 2.1Food: An ideal source domain for metaphorical conceptualization
- 2.2The relation between appetizing food and attractive individuals is experientially grounded
- 2.3Cultural and contextual constraints for the conceptualization of attractive individuals as appetizing food
- 3.Gender-stereotyped food and beliefs encoded in food metaphors
- 4.Methodology and data
- 4.1Methodological approach and procedure
- 4.2Data
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1Frequency distribution
- 5.2Cross-tabulation results
- 5.3Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
- Notes
References
References (62)
Adams, C. J. (1991). The
sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York: Continuum
Ahrens, W. (2015). Sensory
taste preferences and taste sensitivity and the association of unhealthy food patterns with overweight and obesity in primary
school children in Europe – a synthesis of data from the IDEFICS
study. Flavour, 41, Article
8.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials
and limitations of discourse-centred online
ethnography. Language@internet, 51, Article
9. [URL]
(2014). Computer-mediated
communication and linguistic landscapes. In J. Holmes & K. Hazen (Eds.), Research
methods in sociolinguistics: A practical
guide (pp. 74–90). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.
Baider, F. H., & Gesuato, S. (2003). Masculinist
metaphors, feminist
research. Metaphorik.de, 51, 6–25.
Baroni, M., & Bernardini, S. (2004). BootCaT:
Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. Paper
in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and
Evaluation (LREC’04). Lisbon, Portugal, May
2004.
Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2000). The
neural basis of romantic love. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience
Research, 11(17), 3829–3834.
Boutaud, J.-J., Becuţ, A., & Marinescu, A. (2016). Food
and culture. Cultural patterns and practices related to food in everyday life.
Introduction. International Review of Social
Research, 6(1), 1–3.
Brulotte, R. L., & Di Giovine, M. A. (2014). Edible
identities: Food as cultural
heritage. London: Routledge.
Cameron, L. (2010). Identifying
metaphors in discourse data. In L. Cameron, & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor
analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the
humanities (pp. 97–115). Oakville: Equinox.
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The
emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied
Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690.
Cavazza, N., Guidetti, M., & Butera, F. (2015). Ingredients
of gender-based stereotypes about food. Indirect influence of food type, portion size and presentation on gendered intentions
to
eat. Appetite, 911, 266–272.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus
approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dragoescu, A.-A. (2011). Implications
of quality in food metaphors. Paper presented at The 5th
International Quality Conference. Center for Quality, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of
Kragujevac.
Fisher, H., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Romantic
love: An fMRI study of neural mechanism for mate choice. The Journal of Comparative
Neurology, 493(1), 58–62.
Fisher, H., Xu, X., Aron, A., & Brown, L. (2016). Intense,
passionate, romantic love: A natural addiction? How the fields that investigate romance and substance abuse can inform each
other. Frontiers in
Psychology, 71, Article 687.
Gibbs, Jr. R. W. (2017). Metaphor
wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. New York: Cambridge University Press
Grady, J. (1999). A
typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs.
resemblance. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor
in cognitive
linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Group, P. (2007). MIP:
A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and
Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Gutiérrez-Rivas, C. (2011). Women
as food in Hispanic cultural metaphors. An Online Feminist
Journal, 3(3), 6–20.
Hines, C. (2000). Rebaking
the pie: The woman as dessert metaphor. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang & L. A. Sutton (Eds.), Reinventing
identities: The gendered self in
discourse (pp. 145–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Khajeh, Z., & Abdullah, I. (2012). Persian
culinary metaphors: A cross-cultural conceptualization. GEMA Online: Journal of Language
Studies, 12(1), 69–87.
Kleparski, G. A. (2008). The
joys and sorrows of metaphorical consumption: Mozarellas, prostisciuttos, muttons and yum-yum girls – foodsemy with a romance
accent. Studia Anglica
Resoviensia, 51(5), 45–59.
Kleparski, G. A., & Górecka-Smolińska, M. (2019). Bifurcating
the mechanism of foodsemy: Randy skeletal meats, sinister variety meats, gay fruit, sick veggies and bad
apples. Styles of
Communication, 11(1), 29–48.
Koller, V. (2004). Businesswomen
and war metaphors: ‘Possessive, jealous and pugnacious’?. Journal of
Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 3–22.
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where
metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kowalczyk, A. Z. (2016). The
semantic history of dough, bread, bun: On how money and women go together. Studia Anglica
Resoviensia, 13(93), 34–43.
(2019). Semantic
transfers in the domain of foodstuffs. Linguistics beyond and
within, 5(1), 90–102.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More
than cool reason: A field guide to poetic
metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P. (2014). The
power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social
life (Vol. 1551). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Littlemore, J. (2019). Metaphors
in the mind: Sources of variation in embodied metaphor. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Monterrosa, E. C., Frongillo, E. A., Drewnowski, A., de Pee, S., & Vandevijvere, S. (2020). Sociocultural
influences on food choices and implications for sustainable healthy diets. Food and Nutrition
Bulletin, 41(2_suppl), 59S–73S.
Mori, D., Chaiken, S., & Pliner, P. (1987). “Eating
lightly” and the self-presentation of femininity. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 53(4), 693–702.
Musolff, A. (2016). Cross-cultural
variation in deliberate metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and the Social
World, 6(2), 205–224.
Níkleva, D. G. (2016). Tendencias actuales en los piropos españoles [Current trends
in Spanish
compliments]. Onomázein, (34), 322–355.
Onchoke, A. S., & Wen, X. (2017). A
cognitive analysis of woman metaphors in Ekegusii language. Linguistics and Literature
Studies, 5(5), 344–353.
Partearroyo, T., Samaniego-Vaesken, M. D. L., Ruiz, E., Aranceta-Bartrina, J., Gil, Á., González-Gross, M., Ortega, R. M., Serra-Majem, L., & Varela-Moreiras, G. (2019). Current
food consumption amongst the Spanish ANIBES study
population. Nutrients, 11(11), Article
2663.
Pérez, J. C. (2005). El piropo en la España de 2000 y las nuevas formas de cortesía [The compliment in Spain in 2000 and the new forms of
courtesy]. Revistainternacional de
lingüísticaiberoamericana, 3(1), 31–48. [URL]
Ramírez, E. C. O. (2008). El arte de piropear: ¿halago u ofensa? [The art of
complimenting: Flattery or offense?]. Tinkuy: Boletín de investigación y
debate, 101, 51–59.
Robinson, M. J. F., Fischer, A. M., Ahuja, A., Lesser, E. N., & Maniates, H. (2015). Roles
of “wanting” and “liking” in motivating behavior: Gambling, food, and drug
addictions. In E. H. Simpson & P. D. Balsam (Eds.), Behavioral
neuroscience of
motivation (pp. 105–136). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Rodríguez, I. L. (2007). The
representation of women in teenage and women’s magazines: Recurring metaphors in
English. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad
Complutense, 151, 15–42.
Rodríguez, I. (2008). Are
women really sweet? An analysis of the woman as dessert metaphor in the English and Spanish written
press. Babel–AFIAL: Aspectos de Filoloxía Inglesa e
Alemá, (32), 179–195.
Rozin, P. (2005). The
meaning of food in our lives: A cross-cultural perspective on eating and well-being. Journal of
Nutrition Education and
Behaviour, 37(S2), S107–S112.
(2015). Food
preferences, psychology and physiology of. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International
encyclopedia of the social & behavioral
sciences (pp. 296–299). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rozin, P., Hormes, J. M., Faith, M. S., & Wansink, B. (2012). Is
meat male? A quantitative multimethod framework to establish metaphoric relationships. Journal
of Consumer
Research, 39(3), 629–643.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2020). Understanding
figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language &
Communication, 711, 16–38.
Sobal, J. (2005). Men,
meat, and marriage: Models of masculinity. Food and
Foodways, 13(1–2), 135–158.
Soriano, C. (2012). Metáfora
conceptual. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano & J. Valenzuela (Eds.), Lingüística
cognitive (pp. 97–121). Barcelona: Anthropos.
Steen, G. (2014). The
cognitive-linguistic revolution in metaphor studies. In J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The
Bloomsbury companion to cognitive
linguistics (pp. 117–142). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors
we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PloS
one, 6(2), Article
e16782.
Trachootham, D., Satoh-Kuriwada, S., Lam-ubol, A., Promkam, C., Chotechuang, N., Sasano, T., & Shoji, N. (2018). Differences
in taste perception and spicy preference: A Thai-Japanese cross-cultural study. Chemical
Senses, 43(1), 65–74.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The
embodied mind: Cognitive science and human
experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
