Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Approaches to Mind, Language, and Society: Theory and description
Edited by Mario Serrano-Losada and Daniela Pettersson-Traba
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1] 2024
► pp. 75–98

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

A cognitive-pragmatic account of the structural elements of the ironic event

A typology of ironist, target, and interpreter roles

ORCiD logo with link | Universitat Politècnica de València
Published online: 6 June 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00113.loz
Abstract
This article discusses the ironist, the interpreter, and the target as structural elements of irony from a cognitive-linguistic standpoint. It builds on the scenario-based approach to irony, where ironic meaning is taken as a contextually adjustable inference that results from a clash between epistemic and attested conceptual scenarios. The article provides a classification of ironist, interpreter, and target types, and then it discusses the functions of irony (i.e., attacking, mocking, being playful, showing off, and persuading) and the solidarity component involved in ironic production and interpretation. It further explains the factors involved in the identification of the epistemic and the attested scenarios, and those involved in the interpretation of irony. The resulting analysis of the structural elements of irony endows the study of irony with greater descriptive delicacy and explanatory adequacy.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.A brief overview of ironists and interpreters
  • 4.Structural elements of irony
    • 4.1The ironist
      • 4.1.1Functions of irony
      • 4.1.2Solidarity
        • 4.1.2.1The identification of the epistemic scenario
        • 4.1.2.2The identification of the attested scenario
    • 4.2The interpreter
      • 4.2.1Factors involved in the interpretation of irony
    • 4.3The target
  • 5.Conclusions
  • References
References (39)
References
Al-Hindawi, F. H. H., & Kadhim, B. J. (2016). A pragmatic study of irony in political electoral speeches. In F. H. H. Al-Hindawi & W. R. Al-Juwaid (Eds.), Pragmatic analysis of political data (pp. 260–309). Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (2002). Humour and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 159–179). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 113(1), 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colebrook, C. (2004). Irony. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, Jr. R. W. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently?. Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 57–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2005). Sarcasm and the space structuring model. In S. Coulson & B. Lewandowska-Tomasczyk (Eds.), The literal and nonliteral in language and thought (pp. 129–144). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghanem, B., Karoui, J., Benamara, F., Rosso, P., & Moriceau, V. (2020, April 14–17). Irony detection in a multilingual context. Paper delivered at ECIR 2020: Advances in Information Retrieval, Lisbon, Portugal. [URL].
Gibbs, Jr. R. W., & Beitel, D. (1995). What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 133–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr. R. W., Bryant, G. A., & Colston, H. L. (2014). Where is the humor in verbal irony?. HUMOR, 27(4), 575–595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr. R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2007). Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. New York: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011). Cicero: Against Verres. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19(2), 239–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Irony and its discontent. In D. Shram & G. J. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature: In honor of Elrud Ibsch (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Laadan, D., Wolfson, J., Zeituny, M., Kidron, R., Kaufman, R., & Shaham, R. (2007). Expecting irony: Context versus salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(2), 119–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2002). Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(4), 327–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gooch, P. W. (1987). Socratic irony and Aristotle’s ‘eiron’: Some puzzles. Phoenix, 41(2), 95–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hong, H. V., & Hong, E. H. (1989). Kierkegaard’s writings, II, volume 2: The concept of irony, with continual reference to Socrates/notes of Schelling’s Berlin lectures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. (1994). Irony’s edge: The theory and politics of irony. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lozano-Palacio, I., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2022). Modeling irony: A cognitive-pragmatic account. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lozano-Palacio, I. (2023). A multidimensional approach to echoing: Categories, uses, and types. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 210–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, P., Kelly, S., & Christen, S. (2014). A path model of workplace solidarity, satisfaction, burnout, and motivation. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(1), 31–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muecke, D. C. (1969). The compass of irony. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsen, E. S., Glenwright, M., & Huyder, V. (2011). Children and adults understand that verbal irony interpretation depends on listener knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12(3), 374–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 286–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2014). Pretence and echo: Towards and integrated account of verbal irony. International Review of Pragmatics, 6(1), 127–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2017). Cognitive modeling and irony. In A. Athanasiadou & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 179–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication, 711, 16–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Barreras Gómez, M. A. (2022). Linguistic and metalinguistic resemblance. In A. Bagasheva, B. Hristov & N. Tincheva (Eds.), Figurativity and human ecology (pp.15–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Lozano-Palacio, I. (2019a). Unraveling irony: From linguistics to literary criticism and back. Cognitive Semantics, 51, 147–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019b). A cognitive-linguistic approach to complexity in Irony: Dissecting the ironic echo. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 127–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). On verbal and situational irony: Towards a unified approach. In A. Soares da Silva (Ed.), Figurative language – Intersubjectivity and usage (pp. 213–240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabacaru, S. (2019). A multimodal study of sarcasm in interactional humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tobin, V., & Israel, M. (2012). Irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. In B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 25–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veale, T., & Hao, Y. (2010, August, 16–20). Detecting ironic intent in creative comparisons. Paper delivered at 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Lisbon, Portugal.
Wheeless, L. R. (1978). A follow-up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4(2), 143–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Explaining irony. In D. Wilson & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue