Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Approaches to Mind, Language, and Society: Theory and description
Edited by Mario Serrano-Losada and Daniela Pettersson-Traba
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1] 2024
► pp. 34–50

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

From conceptual to literary metaphors

A neuroaesthetics perspective

ORCiD logo with link | Universidad de Alcalá
Published online: 6 June 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00111.por
Abstract
It is generally agreed that literary metaphors are produced and interpreted by using the same strategies as more conventional, ordinary metaphorical expressions (George Lakoff & Mark Turner 1989; Kövecses, Z. (2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar). However, the aesthetic experience of reading metaphors in literature is a complex phenomenon that remains only partially explained. This paper aims at contributing to the study of the cognitive mechanisms that allow the aesthetic experience when reading poetic metaphors. For this purpose, after a short review of previous research on literary metaphors in the Cognitive Linguistic framework, the main tenets of Neuroaesthetics ( (2001). Artistic creativity and the brain. Science, 293(5527), 51–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar; Ramachandran, V. (2003). The emerging mind. London: Profile Books Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), an emerging empirical discipline, are presented as referred to the study of visual art. Then, the insights from both fields are compared and applied to the study of metaphors. Results show significant coincidences as empirical research in neuroscience seem to confirm the theories and hypotheses posed by cognitive linguists, as for the way in which the emotional response to poetic metaphors is elicited.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literary metaphors in cognitive linguistics
  • 3.Neuroaesthetics: An emergent discipline for the study of visual art
  • 4.Neuroaesthetics and literary metaphors
  • 5.Final remarks
  • Note
  • References
References (53)
References
Burke, M. (2013). The rhetorical neuroscience of style: On the primacy of style elements during literary discourse processing. Journal of Literary Semantics, 42(2), 199–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cavanagh, P. (2005). The artist as neuroscientist. Nature, 4341, 301–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2011). Neuroaesthetics: A coming of age story. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 23(1), 53–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The aesthetic brain: How we evolved to desire beauty and enjoy art. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Neuroaesthetics: Descriptive and experimental approaches. In P. P. L. Tinio & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 481–499). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 370–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A., Thomas, A., Smith, S. E., & Aguirre, G. K. (2009). The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology, 23(2), 135–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coccagna, M., Avanzini, P., Portera, M., Vecchiato, G., Destro, M. F., Sironi, A. V., Salvi, F., Banzi, A., Elisabetta, C., Lanzoni, L., Antonella, V., Bisi, M., Cesari, S., Vivarelli, A., Pier, G. B., Camillo, G. S., Sassu, G., & Mazzacane, S. (2020). Neuroaesthetics of art vision: An experimental approach to the sense of beauty. Journal of Clinical Trials, 10(2), Article 1000404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freeman, M. H. (1998). Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a cognitive theory of literature. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 253–282). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Cognitive linguistic approaches to literary studies: State of the art in cognitive poetics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1175–1202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavins, J., & G. Steen. (2003). Cognitive poetics in practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr. R. W. (1990). The process of understanding literary metaphor. Journal of Literary Semantics, 19(2), 65–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2015a). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 91, Article 186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In R. M. Willems (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use (pp. 135–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Creating metaphor in context. International Journal of Language and Culture, 1(1), 21–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Metaphor universals in literature. ANTARES: Letras e Humanidades, 10(20), 154–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leder, H. (2013). Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study?. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 27–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miall, D. S. (2009). Neuroaesthetics of literary reading. In M. Skov, O. Vartanian, C. Martindale & A. Berleant (Eds.), Neuroaesthetics (pp. 233–247). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Towards an empirical model of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature, 8(1), 21–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2017). Metaphor and cultural cognition. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 325–344). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Porto, M. D. (2018). Un viaje a las metáforas literarias: de la lingüística cognitiva a la neuroestética [A journey to literary metaphors: From Cognitive Linguistics to Neuroaesthetics]. Lingüística en Red (LinRed), XV Monográfico, 2–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. (2003). The emerging mind. London: Profile Books Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 15–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salgaro, M. (2009). The text as a manual. Some reflections on the concept of language from a neuroaesthetic perspective. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(1), 155–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seeley, W. P. (2013). Art, meaning, and perception: A question of methods for a cognitive neuroscience of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 53(4), 443–460. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E., & Steen, G. (2008). Metaphor in literature. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 232–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. (2005/1595). Romeo and Juliet (T. J. B. Spencer Ed.). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skov, M., & Nadal, M. (2022). The Routledge international handbook of neuroaesthetics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. (1994). Understanding metaphor in Literature: An empirical approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Analyzing metaphor in literature: With examples from William Wordsworth’s “I wandered lonely as a cloud.”. Poetics Today, 20(3), 499–522. [URL]
(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 901, 67–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G., & Gibbs, Jr. R. W. (2004). Questions about metaphor in literature. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 337–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Texture. In V. Sotirova (Ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to stylistics (pp. 458–473). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabakowska, E. (1993). Cognitive linguistics and poetics of translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2015). Relating language to other cognitive systems: An overview. Cognitive Semantics, 1(1), 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsur, R. (1992). Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Aspects of cognitive poetics. In E. Semino & J. Culpeper (Eds.), Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 279–318). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeki, S. (1998). Art and the brain. Daedalus, 127(2), 71–103. [URL]
(1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Artistic creativity and the brain. Science, 293(5527), 51–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeki, S., Bao, Y., & Pöppel, E. (2020). Neuroaesthetics: The art, science, and brain triptych. Psych Journal, 9(4), 427–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue