Cover not available

Article published In: Perception, Culture and Language
Edited by Judit Baranyiné Kóczy and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2] 2023
► pp. 450–479

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Paths of linguistic synesthesia across cultures

A lexical analysis of conventionalized cross‑sensory meaning extensions in Europe and Central Asia

ORCiD logo with link | Eötvös Loránd University
ORCiD logo with link | Eötvös Loránd University
Published online: 17 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00108.gal
Abstract
The article focuses on the conventionalized cross-sensory uses of basic-level adjectives in a sample of eight languages: English, German, French, Spanish, Russian, Hungarian, Tajik, and Uzbek. After a differentiation of cross-sensory language use (also called linguistic synesthesia) from other phenomena that combine the senses (namely, neuropsychological synesthesia and cross-sensory correspondences), it reports on a dictionary-based semantic analysis that distinguishes between three main semantic mechanisms leading to cross-sensory language use: direct cross-sensory transfer (e.g., a dark sound), more schematic generalized meanings (e.g., soft ‘pleasant, gentle, not too intense’), and highly figurative extensions (e.g., a dark melody, in which dark means ‘gloomy’). It also emphasizes that these three categories are often intertwined due to the inherent fog-like nature of meaning. After summarizing every instance of conventionalized cross-sensory meaning potential that could be found in the dictionaries, it concludes that (1) the results are in line with the widely observed directional preferences also referred to as the hierarchy of the senses; (2) the evaluative dimension is present in many transfers, but it cannot account for the extended uses alone; (3) there are some obvious differences between the Western and the Central Asian languages, even though one cannot speak of fundamentally different conceptual systems regarding the language of the senses. Besides these general observations, the outcomes of this principally exploratory investigation also point to many uncharted territories to be examined in future studies.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Linguistic synesthesia, canonical synesthesia, and cross-sensory correspondences
  • 3.The design of the study
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Vision: Brightness
    • 4.2Vision: Color
    • 4.3Vision: Beauty
    • 4.4Hearing
    • 4.5Smell
    • 4.6Taste
    • 4.7Touch
    • 4.8Temperature
    • 4.9Heaviness
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (62)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Storch, A. (2013). Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & A. Storch (Eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture (pp. 1–46). Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bagli, M. (2021). Tastes we live by: The linguistic conceptualisation of taste in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacciari, C. (2008). Crossing the senses in metaphorical language. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 425–443). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crisinel, A.-S., & Spence, C. (2012). The impact of pleasantness ratings on crossmodal associations between food samples and musical notes. Food Quality and Preference, 24(1), 136–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Ullmann, S. (1945). Romanticism and synaesthesia: A comparative study of sense transfer in Keats and Byron. PMLA, 60(3), 811–827. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1959). The principles of semantics. Glasgow: Jackson, Son & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Vignemont, F., & Massin, O. (2015). Touch. In M. Matthen (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception (pp. 294–313). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deroy, O., & Spence, C. (2013). Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 201, 643–664. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A., & Casasanto, D. (2013). The thickness of musical pitch: Psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological Science, 24(5), 613–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fishman, A. (2022). The picture looks like my music sounds: Directional preferences in synesthetic metaphors in the absence of lexical factors. Language and Cognition, 14(2), 208–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2015). Sense individuation. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of semantics (pp. 233–247). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Győri, G. (2002). Semantic change and cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(2), 123–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwahashi, K. (2017). On the core function of English sensory adjectives. Osaka University Papers in English Linguistics, 181, 127–146.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 411, 558–564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martino, G., & Marks, L. E. (1999). Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: Tests of the semantic coding hypothesis. Perception, 28(7), 903–923. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Synesthesia: strong and weak. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 61–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakova, M. (2003). The extent of the literal: Metaphor, polysemy and theories of concepts. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryzhova, D., Rakhilina, E., & Kholkina, L. (2019). Approaching perceptual qualities: The case of heavy. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 185–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., & Majid, A. (2018). Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 371–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2008). Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualisation and language. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind: Volume 2: Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 109–136). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2019). Grounding language in the neglected senses of touch, taste, and smell. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(5–6), 363–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 731, 971–995. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Synaesthetic metaphors in translation. Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 54(1), 43–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Figures and the senses: Towards a definition of synaesthesia. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), 83–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, F., & De Felice, I. (2019). Metaphors and perception in the lexicon: A diachronic perspective. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 85–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, F., & Huang, C.-R. (2016). A lexicon of perception for the identification of synaesthetic metaphors in corpora. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), 2270–2277.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suárez-Toste, E. (2017). Babel of the senses: On the roles of metaphor and synesthesia in wine reviews. Terminology, 23(1), 89–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tóth, M. (2016). Farbige Düfte: Metonymie und verbale Synästhesie [Colorful scents: Metonymy and linguistic synesthesia]. Argumentum, 121, 152–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viberg, Å. (1983). The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics, 21(1), 123–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, P. (2012). Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: Visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 741, 1792–1809. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. M. (1976). Synaesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language, 52(2), 461–478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019b). Synaesthetic metaphors are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 105–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Q., Huang, C.-R., & Ahrens, K. (2019). Directionality of linguistic synesthesia in Mandarin: A corpus-based study. Lingua, 2321, Article 102744.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Q., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C.-R. (2022). Linguistic synesthesia is metaphorical: A lexical-conceptual account. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(3), 553–583.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dictionaries
English
Merriam-Webster. (2014). Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (11th ed.). Springfield, MA: Author. Online version: [URL]
Rundell, M., & Fox, G. (Eds.). (2007). Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Online version: [URL]
French
Dico en ligne Le Robert [Le Robert online dictionary]: [URL]
Larousse dictionnaire de la langue française en ligne [Larousse online dictionary of the French language]: [URL]
German
Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache [Digital dictionary of the German language]: [URL]
Duden (2019). Deutsches Universalwörterbuch [Universal German dictionary] (19th ed.). Berlin: Author. Online version: [URL]
Hungarian
Bárczi, G., & Országh, L. (Eds.). (1959–1962). A magyar nyelv értelmező szótára [Explanatory dictionary of the Hungarian language]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. Online version: [URL]
Pusztai, F. (Ed.). (2003). Magyar értelmező kéziszótár [Concise Hungarian explanatory dictionary]. (2nd, rev. ed.). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quasthoff, U., Fiedler, S., & Hallsteinsdóttir, E. (Eds.). (2013). Frequency dictionary Hungarian. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russian
Ozhegov, S. I., & Shvedova, N. Yu. (2006). Tolkoviy slovar’ russkogo yazika [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yevgenyeva, A. P., & Razumnikova, G. A. (1985). Slovar’ russkogo yazika, Tom 1–4 [Dictionary of the Russian language, Vol. 1–4]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spanish
Moliner, M. (Ed.). (2007). Diccionario de uso del español [Dictionary of Spanish language use]. (3rd ed.). Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española (2014). Diccionario de la lengua española [Dictionary of the Spanish language] (23rd ed.). Madrid: Author. Online version: [URL]
Tajik
Mamanazarov, A. (2015). Farhangi Anglis’i-Toçik [Standard English-Tajik dictionary]. Dushanbe: ER-graf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirboboev, A. (2006). Farhangi Toçik’i-Rus’i [Tajik-Russian dictionary]. Dushanbe: Pajukhishgohi Rudaki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nazarzoda, S., Sanginov, A., Karimov, S., & Hasani Sulton, M. (2008). Farhangi tafsirii zaboni toçik 1–2 [Explanatory dictionary of the Tajik language, Vol. 1–2]. Dushanbe: Tаjikistan Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osimi, M. S. (1985). Lunati Rus’i-Toçik’i/Russko-Tadsikskiy slovar’ [Russian-Tajik dictionary]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the TjSSR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakhimi, V. M., & Uspenskaja, L. V. (1954). Lunati Toçik’i-Rus’i [Tajik-Russian dictionary]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the TjSSR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shukurova, M. Sh., Kapranov, V. A., Khashima, R., & Masumi, N. A. (1969). Farhangi tafsirii zaboni toçik 1–2 [Explanatory dictionary of the Tajik language, Vol. 1–2]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the TjSSR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uzbek
Akobirov, S. F., Ma’rufov, Z. M., & Xo’jaxonov, A. T. (1959). O’zbekcha-Ruscha lug’at [Uzbek-Russian dictionary]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akobirov, S. F., & Mikhajlov, G. N. (1988). O’zbekcha-Ruscha lug’at [Uzbek-Russian dictionary]. Tashkent: Academy of Sciences of the UzSSR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azizov, O., & Rizaeva, Z. (1989). O’zbekcha-Ruscha lug’at [Uzbek-Russian dictionary]. Tashkent: O’qituvchi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Begmatov, E., Madvaliev, A., Mahkamov, N., Mirzaev, T., Tukhliev, N., Umarov, E., Khudoyberganova, D., Hojiev, A. (2006–2008). O’zbek tilining izohli lug’ati 1–2 [Explanatory dictionary of the Uzbek language, Vol. 1–2]. Tashkent: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butayev, Sh., & Irisqulov, A. (2008). Inglizcha-O’zbekcha/O’zbekcha-Inglizcha lug’at [English-Uzbek Uzbek-English dictionary]. Tashkent: Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koshchanov, M. K., Akobirov, S. F., Al’xamova, N. A., Kadirov, I. K., Kim, S. S., Ma’rufov, Z. M., … Shaabdurahmanov, Sh. Sh. (1983). Ruscha-O’zbekcha Lug’at/Russko-Uzbekskij slovar’ 1–2 [Russian-Uzbek dictionary, Vol. 1–2]. Tashkent: Academy of Sciences of the UzSSR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma’rufov, Z. M. (1981). O’zbek tilining izohli lug’ati 1–2 [Explanatory dictionary of the Uzbek language, Vol. 1–2]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the UzSSR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Winter, Bodo & Francesca Strik-Lievers
2025. Linguistic Synesthesia, DOI logo
Tatiana A. Litvinova & Olga V. Dekhnich
2024. Modeling the Meaning of Individual Words Using Cultural Cartography and Keystroke Dynamics. Integration of Education 28:4 ► pp. 624 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue