Cover not available

Article published In: Perception, Culture and Language
Edited by Judit Baranyiné Kóczy and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2] 2023
► pp. 398–421

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Metaphors from perception and culture

The case of solidity

ORCiD logo with link | The Pennsylvania State University
Published online: 17 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00106.yu
Abstract
Applying conceptual metaphor theory, this study aims to discuss how metaphors emerge from the interaction between perceptual experience and cultural environment, comparing English and Chinese. The kind of metaphors under study is rooted in the object image schema, particularly in its dimension in solidity with bipolar values as hard and soft. Specifically, these are primary metaphors grounded in experiential correlations in manipulating physical objects that are hard or soft. It is argued that the similarities and differences between English and Chinese in such metaphorical mappings can be accounted for by four main meaning focuses consisting in four pairs of parametric variables: more or less effort, more or less impact, more or less strength, and more or less flexibility. These parametric variables determine metaphorical mapping pathways from hard and soft as source concepts to some abstract target concepts.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Relevant preceding studies
  • 3.A comparative study between English and Chinese
    • 3.1The English data in COCA
    • 3.2The Chinese data in BCC
    • 3.3The English and Chinese data in comparison
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (27)
References
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997a). Foundation of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.
(1997b). Theories are Buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. E., & Ascoli, G. A. (2017). Sources and targets in primary metaphor theory: Looking back and thinking ahead. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 27–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The metaphor-metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maalej, Z., & Yu, N. (2011). Introduction: Embodiment via body parts. In Z. Maalej & N. Yu (Eds.), Embodiment via body parts: Studies from various languages and cultures (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S. (2008). Culture and language: Looking for the “mind” inside the body. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages (pp. 3–23). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. M. (1976). Synaesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language, 52(2), 461–478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, B., & Matlock, T. (2017). Primary metaphors are both cultural and embodied. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 99–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32(1), 19–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). The eyes for sight and mind. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(4), 663–686. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Metaphor from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The body in anatomy: Looking at “head” for the mind-body link in Chinese. In R. Caballero & J. E. Díaz Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition: Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 53–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Embodiment, culture, and language. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 227–239). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). The moral metaphor system: A conceptual metaphor approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, N., & Huang, J. (2019). Primary metaphors across languages: Difficulty as weight and solidity. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 111–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, N., Yu, L., & Lee, Y. C. (2017). Primary metaphors: Importance as size and weight in a comparative perspective. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(4), 231–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Q., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C.-R. (2022). Linguistic synesthesia is metaphorical: A lexical-conceptual account. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(3), 553–583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Gary, Joston, Yang Gu, Hannah Wang, Xixing Zhou, Yan Feng & António Carrizo Moreira
2026. How Music–Video metaphors build destination brand resonance: Dyadic affect, meaning access, and cultural cues. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 89 ► pp. 104637 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Jie
2025. Loudness Metaphors in Chinese: Lexical and Corpus-Based Approaches. Metaphor and Symbol 40:3 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Navarro i Ferrando, Ignasi & Montserrat Esbrí-Blasco
2024. Frames and semantic roles in metaphorical mappings. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue