Review published In: Perception, Culture and Language
Edited by Judit Baranyiné Kóczy and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2] 2023
► pp. 488–497
Book review
. Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2022. ISBN 978-9-027-21062-3 (Hardbound) xxiii + 283 pp. € 90. https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.4
Reviewed by
Published online: 17 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00099.tan
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00099.tan
References (24)
Bambini, V., Van Looy, L., Demiddele, K., & Schaeken, W. (2021). What
is the contribution of executive functions to communicative-pragmatic skills? Insights from aging and different types of
pragmatic inference. Cognitive
Processing, 22(3), 435–452.
Bara, B. G. (2010). Cognitive
pragmatics: The mental processes of communication (J. Douthwaite, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Barcelona, A. (2003). On
the plausibility of claiming a métonymie motivation for conceptual
metaphor. In A. Barceloca (Ed.), Metaphor
and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive
perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2005). The
multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic
chains. In Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M. S. P. Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive
linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary
interaction (pp. 313–352). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cutica, I., Bucciarelli, M., & Bara, B. G. (2006). Neuropragmatics:
Extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right-hemisphere-damaged
patients. Brain and
Language, 98(1), 12–25.
Gabbatore, I., Sacco, K., Angeleri, R., Zettin, M., Bara, B. G., & Bosco, F. M. (2015). Cognitive
pragmatic treatment: A rehabilitative program for traumatic brain injury individuals. Journal
of Head Trauma
Rehabilitation, 30(5), E14–28.
Goddard, C. (2006). Ethopragmatics:
Understanding discourse in cultural
context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haugh, M., Kádár, D. Z., & Terkourafi, M. (2021). Introduction: directions in sociopragmatics. In M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár & M. Terkourafi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociopragmatics (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations
of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1: Theoretical
Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mey, J. L., Haberland, H., & Fisher, K. (2010). Editorial. Pragmatics
and
Society, 1(1), 1–8.
Panther, K.-U. & Radden, G. (2011). Introduction:
Reflections on motivation revisited. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation
in grammar and the
lexicon (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (1998). A
cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics, 30(6), 755–769.
(2007). Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L. L. (2017). Metaphor
and metonymy in language and thought: A cognitive linguistic approach. Synthesis
Philosophica, 32(2), 271–294.
(2018). What
kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual
metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive
issues (pp. 121–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thornburg, L. L., & Panther, K.-U. (1997). Speech
act metonymies. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. R. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse
and perspective in cognitive
linguistics (pp. 205–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wen, X. (2019). 基于“社会认知”的社会认知语言学 [Sociocognitive linguistics based on
social cognition]. Modern Foreign
Languages, 42(3), 293–305.
Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-cultural
pragmatics: The semantics of human
interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.