Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 9:2 (2022) ► pp.341–360
A multimodal cognitive critical analysis
A comparative study of recruitment advertisements between China and America
Published online: 6 December 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00091.pan
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00091.pan
Abstract
This paper makes a comparative study of recruitment advertisements between China and the United States from the perspective of Multimodal Cognitive Critical Analysis. Based on the analysis of metaphor and metonymy, the paper reveals the differences between them in contents, narrative strategies and combination of semiotic resources. In terms of contents, there are varying degrees of emphasis on military mission, income, values, and mental health. In terms of narrative strategies, China adopts a “parental” strategy, while the United States adopts a “corporate” strategy. As to the combination of semiotic resources, China and the United States differ in their use of cartoons and posters, and adopt different shooting angles of posters. This study holds that military conscription is not only a political activity, but also a platform to construct positive image of Chinese soldiers and demonstrate the strength of China’s military forces. Therefore, it is necessary to constantly adjust the above factors according to the characteristics of the era and reading habits of the viewers.
Article outline
- I.Introduction
- 2.Multimodal cognitive critical analysis
- 3.The analysis of recruitment advertisements
- 3.1Analysis of military recruitment advertisements of China
- 3.1.1Social cultural contexts
- 3.1.2Genre features
- 3.1.3Thematic analysis of China’s military recruitment advertisements
- 3.2Analysis of military recruitment advertisements of America
- 3.2.1Socio-cultural context
- 3.2.2Genre features
- 3.2.3Thematic analysis of American conscription advertisements
- 3.1Analysis of military recruitment advertisements of China
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (8)
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Mutimodal Metaphor [M]. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996/2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design [M]. London: Routledge.
Pan, Y., & Zhang, H. (2013). A Multimodal discourse constructed by metaphor and metonymy: A case study of “Chinese national image film angle” [多模态语篇的认知机制研究——以《中国国家形象片·角度篇》为例]. Foreign Language Studies, (1): 10–19.
Pan, Y., & Li, Z. (2017). A comprehensive review of domestic multimodal discourse analysis (2003–2017)-Taking the published results of CSSCI source journals as the object of investigation [国内多模态话语分析综论(2003—2017)——以CSSCI来源期刊发表成果为考察对象]. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) (5): 49–59.
Pan, Y. (2019). Analysis of military news reports from the perspective of multimodal cognitive criticism [多模态认知批评视角的军事新闻报道分析]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages (5): 22–30.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
