Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 9:1 (2022) ► pp.31–63

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The iconicity of possessive-affix position in Malayo-Polynesian

 | University of Hamburg
Published online: 30 May 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00089.ber
Abstract
Most languages which code possession morphologically do so by using either prefixes or suffixes. This study examines the minority of languages which employ both prefixes and suffixes in order to express the contrast between alienable and inalienable possession. The focus is on a possible interaction of affix order type and possession type. An analysis of a dozen Malayo-Polynesian languages (8 Eastern Malayo-Polynesian and 4 Central Malayo-Polynesian) reveals a surprisingly consistent pattern. Ten of these languages consistently associate prefixes with alienable possession and suffixes with inalienable possession. None of the 12 languages does it the other way around. This form-meaning relationship is argued to be iconically motivated. Suffixes are claimed to be more closely linked to their stems than prefixes are. This formal closeness mirrors the tighter relationship between possessor and possessum in inalienable than in alienable possession. Five languages make a three-way contrast among inalienable, intermediate and alienable possession. This suggests that the distinction between alienable and inalienable possession should be viewed as a continuum rather than a dichotomy. Individual languages may split up this continuum in different ways.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data analysis
    • 2.1Alune (Niggemeyer 1951)
    • 2.2Paulohi (Stresemann 1918)
    • 2.3Nuaulu (Bolton 1990)
    • 2.4Nadroga (Geraghty 2002)
    • 2.5Gumawana (Olson 1992)
    • 2.6Arifama-Miniafia (Wakefield 1975)
    • 2.7Yamalele (Ezard 1971)
    • 2.8Muyuw (Lithgow & Lithgow 1974)
    • 2.9Bunama (Lithgow 1988)
    • 2.10Maleu (Haywood 1996)
    • 2.11Asilulu (Collins 1983a; Laidig 1993)
    • 2.12Irarutu (van den Berg & Matsumura 2008; Jackson 2014)
    • 2.13Interim conclusion
  • 3.General discussion
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (52)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2013). Possession and ownership: a cross-linguistic perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Possession and ownership. A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Expressing ‘possession’. In L. Johanson, L. F. Mazzitelli & I. Nevskaya (Eds.), Possession in languages of Europe and North and Central Asia (pp. 7–25). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg, T. (2003). Right-branching in English derivational morphology. English Language and Linguistics, 71, 279–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Locating affixes on the lexicon-grammar continuum. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 21, 150–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Ordering biases in cross-linguistic perspective: The interaction of serial order and structural level. Linguistic Typology, 241, 353–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blust, R. (2013). The Austronesian languages. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolton, R. A. (1990). A preliminary description of Nuaulu phonology and grammar. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Arlington: The University of Texas.
Booij, G. & Rubach, J. (1984). Morphological and prosodic domains in Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 11, 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, J. T. (1983a). Syntactic change in Ambonese Malay: The possessive construction. In J. T. Collins (Ed.), Studies in Malay dialects. Part II (pp. 28–41). Jacarta Selatan: Linguistic Studies of Indonesian (NUSA 17).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983b). The historical relationships of the languages of Central Maluku, Indonesia. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devylder, S. (2018). Diagrammatic iconicity explains asymmetries in Paamese possessive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 291, 313–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (2013). Prefixing and suffixing in inflectional morphology. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ezard, J. (1971). Stems and words in Iamalele. Typescript. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geraghty, P. (2000). Possession in Fijian languages. Language Typology and Universals, 531, 243–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Nadroga. In J. Lynch, M. Ross & T. Crowley (Eds.), The Oceanic languages (pp. 833–847). Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Language, 591, 781–819. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). In defense of iconicity. Cognitive Linguistics, 191, 35–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, E. (1993). The phonological word in Korean. In P. M. Clancy (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Vol. 21 (pp. 117–129). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Communication.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2008). Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics, 191, 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Explaining alienability contrasts in adpossessive constructions: predictability vs. iconicity. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 361, 193–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haywood, G. (1996). A Maleu grammar outline and text. In M. D. Ross (Ed.), Studies in languages of New Britain and New Ireland. Vol. 11 (pp. 145–196). Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Closs Traugott, E. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2009). The natural history of verb-stem reduplication in Bantu. Morphology 191, 177–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, J. A. J. (2014). A grammar of Irarutu, a language of West Papua, Indonesia, with historical analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (1996). Possessive noun phrases in Maltese: Alienability, iconicity and grammaticalization. Rivista di Linguistica, 81, 245–274.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laidig, W. D. (1993). Insights from Larike possessive constructions. Oceanic Linguistics, 321, 311–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeding, V. J. (1996). Body parts and possession in Anindilyakwa. In H. Chappell & W. McGregor (Eds.), The grammar of inalienability (pp. 193–249). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, F. (1985). Possessive constructions in Oceanic languages and in Proto-Oceanic. In A. Pawley & L. Carrington (Eds.), Austronesian linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress (pp. 93–140). Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, F., Vaid, J. & Chen, H.-C. (2011). On the interpretation of alienable vs. inalienable possession: A psycholinguistic investigation. Cognitive Linguistics, 221, 659–689. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lithgow, D. R. (1976). Austronesian languages: Milne Bay and adjacent islands. In S. A. Wurm (Ed.), New Guinea languages and language study. Vol. 21 (pp. 441–523). Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lithgow, D. (1988). Bunama grammar. Typescript. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lithgow, D. & D. Lithgow. (1974). Dictionaries of Papua New Guinea: Vol. 1: Muyuw language. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, J. (1997). On the origins of the possessive markers in Central Pacific languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 361, 227–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, J., Ross, M. & Crowley, T. (Eds.) (2002). The Oceanic languages. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morley, E. A. (2010). A grammar of Ajagbe. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, A. (1954). Grammar and vocabulary of the Konua language. Fosieux, Switzerland: Anthropos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, J. (2013). Possessive classification. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niggemeyer, H. (1951). Alune-Sprache: Texte, Wörterverzeichnis und Grammatik einer Sprache West-Cerams. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 761, 50–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, K. (1991). The meaning of the genitive: A case study in semantic structure and semantic change. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 149–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olson, C. (1992). Gumawana (Amphlett Islands, Papua New Guinea): Grammar sketch and dictionary. In M. D. Ross (Ed.), Papers in Austronesian linguistics. Vol. 21 (pp. 251–430). Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, A. & Sayaba, T. (1990). Possessive-marking in Wayan, a Western Fijian language: noun class or relational system? In J. H. C. S. Davidson (Ed.), Pacific island languages: essays in honour of G.B. Milner (pp. 147–171). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radin, P. (1929). A grammar of the Wappo language. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Senft, G. (1986). Kilivila. The language of the Trobriand Islanders. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stresemann, E. (1918). Die Paulohisprache. ‘s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tryon, D. (2002). Numa. In J. Lynch, M. Ross & T. Crowley (Eds.). The Oceanic languages (pp. 573–586). Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van den Berg, R. & Matsumura, T. (2008). Possession in Irarutu. Oceanic Linguistics, 471, 213–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van den Berg, R. & Wiebe, B. (2019). Bola grammar sketch. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics. (Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages, Vol. 63).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wakefield, D. (1975). Grammar notes on Arifama-Miniafia. Typescript. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wennerström, A. (1993). Focus on the prefix: evidence for word-internal prosodic words. Phonology, 101, 309–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, W. H. (1982). Proto-Polynesian possessive marking. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Zingler, Tim & Phillip Rogers
2025. The interaction of affix size, type and shape: a cross-linguistic study. Linguistic Typology 29:2 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue