Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 9:1 (2022) ► pp.1–30
Individual differences in the decline of the Deontic nci construction
A radically usage-based exploratory investigation
Published online: 30 May 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00088.noe
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00088.noe
Abstract
This paper addresses the question of the (speaker-level) ‘cognitive how’ of (language-level) constructional attrition, defined as a systemic decrease in the occurrence of a construction in the history of a language. Presenting and analysing data from an historical idiolectal corpus on the frequency development in individual speakers’ use of a partially schematic construction instantiated by such types as be obliged to and be permitted to, it offers a first attempt to measure whether a general decline in the frequency of this construction can also be observed to be an internal development during a speaker’s lifespan. The results confirm this to be the case in a sizeable group of speakers and the paper provides an initial insight into how this may contribute to a genuinely cognitive account of the speaker-external development.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background and problem
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Results
- 4.1Frequency averages and ranges
- 4.2Frequency development
- 4.2.1Authors using the Deontic nci construction less in later life
- 4.2.2Authors using the Deontic nci construction more in later life
- 4.2.3Authors using the Deontic nci construction as much in late as in early career
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (33)
Anthonissen, L. (2020). Cognition in construction grammar: Connecting individual and community grammars. Cognitive Linguistics, 31(2), 309–337.
Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L., & Gildea, S. (Eds.). 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barlow, M. (2013). Individual differences and Usage-based Grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(4): 443–478.
Bergs, A. (2005). Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Colleman, T., & Noël, D. (2012). The Dutch evidential NCI: A case of constructional attrition. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 13(1), 1–28.
Dąbrowska, E. (2012). Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(3), 219–253.
De Smet, H. (2016). How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change, 28(1). 83–102.
(2020). What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics, 31(2), 251–278.
Disney, S. (2016). Another visit to be supposed to from a diachronic constructionist perspective. English studies, 97(8), 892–916.
Kranich, S., & Breban, T. (Eds.). (2021). Lost in change: Causes and processes in the loss of grammatical elements and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nevalainen, T., Raumolin-Brunberg, H., & Mannila, H. (2011). The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change. Language Variation and Change, 23(1), 1–43.
Noël, D. (2008). The nominative and infinitive in Late Modern English: A diachronic constructionist approach. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(4), 314–340.
(2016). For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 30(1), 39–53.
(2017). The development of non-deontic be bound to in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective. Lingua, 1991, 72–93.
(2019). The decline of the Deontic nci construction in Late Modern English: Towards a radically usage-based perspective on constructional attrition. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 6(1), 22–57.
Noël, D., & Colleman, T. (2021). Diachronic construction grammar. In Xu Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 662–675). London: Routledge.
Petré, P. (2010). The functions of weorðan and its loss in the past tense in Old and Middle English. English Language and Linguistics, 14(3), 457–484.
Petré, P. & Van de Velde, F. (2018). The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language, 94(4), 867–901.
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (2009). Lifespan changes in the language of three early modern gentlemen. In A. Nurmi, M. Nevala & M. Palander-Collin (Eds.), The Language of Daily Life in England (1400–1800) (pp. 165–196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rudnicka, K. (2019). The statistics of obsolescence: Purpose subordinators in Late Modern English. Strasbourg/Basel/Freiburg: EUCOR – The European Campus/Universität Basel/Uni Freiburg.
Sankoff, G. (2005). Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in sociolinguistics. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. J. Mattheier & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 21. (pp. 1002–1013). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Schmid, H. (2015). A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 3(1), 3–26.
(2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmid, H., & Mantlik, A. (2015). Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia, 133(4), 583–623.
Sommerer, L. (2020). Constructionalization, constructional competition and constructional death: investigating the demise of Old English POSS DEM constructions. In L. Sommerer, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and networks: Advances in diachronic construction grammar (pp. 70–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tagliamonti, S. A., & D’Arcy, A. (2007). Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 191, 199–217.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trousdale, G. (2008). Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In S. M. Fitzmaurice & D. Minkova (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change (pp. 301–326). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Verhagen, V. (2019). Illuminating variation: Individual differences in entrenchment of multi-word units. Amsterdam: LOT (Landelijke Onderzoeksschool Taalwetenschap/ Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).
Verhagen, V., & Backus, A. (2010). Individual differences in the perception of entrenchment of multiword units: Evidence from a magnitude estimation task. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 84/85(1), 155–165.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Noël, Dirk
2023. Towards a radically usage-based account of constructional attrition. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 123 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2024. Culture in a radically usage-based model of language change, with special reference to constructional attrition. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 100 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.