Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 8:1 (2021) ► pp.175–203

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Metaphors and their semantic predictability in dyadic interaction

ORCiD logo with link | Southwest University, China
ORCiD logo with link | Southwest University, China
Published online: 8 September 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00071.du
Abstract
Philosophy of dialogue is primarily concerned with the relation of I to you, alternatively as the I-and-you (I ⇄ you) sphere of relation, in Martin Buber’s terminology, on the basis of primary words such as I, you, and it. It is convincingly held that the primary words do not refer to or denote or signify things but they intimate human relations. Grounded on primary words, metaphorical expressions are created to bridge over the cognition gaps encountered in the process of dyadic interaction between I and you. To interpret the spontaneously created metaphorical expressions has become intuitive responses frequenting the participants I and you in the ongoing dyadic interaction. In what way I and you collaboratively predict the meaning of metaphorical expressions is an ontological question which might be tackled from the perspective of epistemology. Therefore, it is in epistemology assumed that the semantic predictability of metaphorical expressions in any dyadic interaction can be conceptually realized by means of the four types of coherence in dialogism such as dictional coherence, emotional coherence, intentional coherence and rational coherence. The four types of coherence might be created saliently either in combination with each other or in isolation. No matter what kind of salience is identified, the I-and-you sphere of relation has at most sixteen channels for predicting the semantics of metaphor created in actual dyadic interaction.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Different views of metaphor
  • 3.The I-and-you sphere of language and the I-and-it sphere of language
  • 4.Primary words and secondary metaphor
  • 5.Reconsiderations of metaphor theories
    • 5.1A reductionist examination of Lakoff and Johnson’s conceptual metaphor theory
    • 5.2A reductionist analysis of Mark Turner’s XYZ metaphor
    • 5.3A reductionist explanation of Aristotle’s theory of metaphor
    • 5.4Summary
  • 6.The semantic predictability of metaphor in dyadic interaction
    • 6.1The dictional coherence of metaphor
    • 6.2The emotional coherence of metaphor
    • 6.3The intentional coherence of metaphor
    • 6.4The rational coherence of metaphor
    • 6.5The channels of semantic predictability
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
References (40)
References
Aristotle. (2006). Poetics. Trans, by J. Sachs. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing Puilins Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beardsley, M. C. (1962). The metaphorical twist. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 221: 293–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, M. (1954). Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 551: 273–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buber, M. (2008). I and Thou. LaVergne, TN: Hesperides Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chibbaro, S., Rondoni, L., & Vulpiani, A. (2014). Reductionism, emergence and levels of reality: The importance of being borderline. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coddy, S. W. (1988). Meaning and intention. Journal of Pragmatics, 121: 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1978). What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry, 51: 31–47. Reprinted in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1984: 245–264.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du, S. (2012). Lines and coherence: Discourse understanding in philosophy of language (Written in Chinese). Beijing: People’s Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, G., Geach, P. T., & Black, M. (1951). On concept and object. Theoria, 601: 168–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, W. H. (1975). On being blue: A philosophical inquiry. Boston: David R. Godine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1969). Utterer’s meaning and intention. The Philosophical Review, 781: 147–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1989). Logic and conversation. Lecture 2. In Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Universitry Press, 22-40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Vol. I1. Trans. by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkes, T. (2018). Metaphor. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirby, J. T. (1997). Aristotle on metaphor. The American Journal of Philology, 1181: 517–554. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Metaphors we live by (with an added Afterword). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. (1984). A theory for metaphor. Journal of Literary Semantics, 131: 35–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1993). The nature of rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor, language, and thought. In A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reddy, M. (1993). The conduit metaphor : A case frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. London and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulte, J. (2009). Wittgenstein on emotion. In Gustafsson, Y. (ed.). Emotions and understanding: Wittgensteinian perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 27–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 76–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M. (2000). Mother is the death of beauty: Mind, metaphor, criticism. Christchurch, New Zealand: Cyberedition Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 841: 327–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology. In Wright, G. H., & Nyman, H. (eds.). Translated by Luckhardt, C. G., & Aue, M. A. E. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Philosophical remarks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Philosophical investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woiwode, L. (1987). Wanting an orange. In Nadell, J., & Langan, J. (eds.). The MacMillan reader. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 72–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue