Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 8:1 (2021) ► pp.133–151
Metonymy
Mental simplism and our best and worst instincts
Published online: 8 September 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00069.jin
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00069.jin
Abstract
This article is concerned with metonymy as a cognitive mechanism underlying our best and worst instincts. In particular, I consider two seemingly opposite processes of metonymy: (1) conceptual bypassing of sensory percepts, which leads to an intuitive leap to abstract insights and judgments and (2) conceptual oversimplification of a social category by stereotyping. By directing attention to that which metonymy is apt to obscure, I encourage the reader to rethink existing models of metonymy that focus on its referential and mental access functions. I offer an complementary account of the functions of metonymy by arguing that mental simplism is central to conceptual bypassing and social stereotyping and by pointing out the social psychological reality of an expressive function of metonymy.
Keywords: metonymy, mental access, mental simplism, instinct, stereotyping
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Olfactory metonymy
- 3.Metonymy, social labels, and social identity
- 3.1Social labels
- 3.2Social identity and social categorization
- 4.Metonymy as mental sumplism: A unitary account
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations used in the examples include
References
References (50)
Bargh, J. A. & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 541, 462–479.
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 621, 893–912.
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditionally automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 321, 185–210.
Bindra, D., & Thompson, W. R. (1953). An evaluation of defecating and urinating as measures of fearfulness. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 461, 43–45.
Bossert, W. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1963). The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 51, 443–469.
Croft, William. (2003). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In: Dirven, René & Pörings, Ralf (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 161–206). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
De Groot, Jasper H. B., and Monique A. M. Smeets. (2017). Human fear chemosignaling: Evidence from a meta-Analysis. Chemical Senses, 42(8), 663–673.
Dirven, René. (2003). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualisation In: Dirven, René & Pörings, Ralf (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 75–112). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, J. (1949). Über das Vorkommen von Schreckstoffen bei Erdkrötenquappen. Experientia, 51, 236.
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 131, 1–17.
Frisch, K. V. (1941). Über einen Schreckstoff der Fischhaut und seine biologische Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie, 291, 46–145.
Frühling, A. (1955). Über das Harnspritzen und ähnliche Verhaltensweisen beim Meerschweinchen. Säugetierkunde Mitteilungen, 31, 168–171.
Hassin, R. R., Aarts, H., & Ferguson, M. J. (2005). Automatic goal inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 129–140.
Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(7), 809–818.
Haslam, S. Alexander, Turner, John C., Oakes, Penelope J., Reynolds, Katherine J. and Doosje, Bertjan. (2002). From personal pictures in the head to collective tools in the world: how shared stereotypes allow groups to represent and change social reality. In: Craig McGarty, et al. (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups (pp. 157–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herrero-Ruiz, Javier. (2009). Understanding tropes: at the crossroads between pragmatics and cognition. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
. (2018). Exaggerating and mitigating through metonymy: The case of situational and cause for effect/effect for cause metonymies. Language and Communication 621, 51–65.
Hrbacek, I. (1950). On the flight reaction of the tadpoles of the common toad caused by chemical substances. Experientia, 61, 100–101.
Kövecses, Zoltán, & Radden, Günter. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78.
Kuo, Tsung-Han, Joanne Y. Yew, Tatyana Y. Fedina, Klaus Dreisewerd, Herman A. Dierick, Scott D. Pletcher. (2012). Aging modulates cuticular hydrocarbons and sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2151, 814–821.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford California, CA: Stanford University Press.
Littlemore, Jeannette. 2015. Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lübke, Katrin T., and Bettina M. Pause. (2015). Always follow your nose: the functional significance of social chemosignals in human reproduction and survival. Hormones and Behavior, 9.4, E94314.
Lübke, K. T., Busch, A., Hoenen, M., Schaal, B. & Pause, B. M. (2017). Chemosensory anxiety signals prime defensive behavior in prepubertal girls. Physiology & Behavior, 1731, 30–33.
McRae, Mary. (2004). How do I talk to you, my white sister? Center for Gender in Organizations Commentaries, 21, 1–4.
Moran, James K., Daniel R. Dietrich, Thomas Elbert, Bettina M. Pause, Lisa Kübler, Roland Weierstall, and Heather Hoffmann. (2015). The scent of blood: A driver of human Behavior? PLoS ONE 10(9), E0137777.
Müller-Velten, H. (1966). Über den Angstgeruch bei der Hausmaus. Zeitschrift Vergleichende Physiologie, 521, 401–429.
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Patin, Alexandra, & Pause, Bettina M. (2015). Human amygdala activations during nasal chemoreception. Neuropsychologia, 781, 171–194.
Pfeiffer, W. (1960). Über die Verbreitung der Schreckreaktion bei Fischen. Naturwissenschaften, 47(1), 23.
Prehn-Kristensen, Alexander, Christian Wiesner, Til Ole Bergmann, Stephan Wolff, Olav Jansen, Hubertus Maximilian Mehdorn, Roman Ferstl, Bettina M. Pause, and Jan Lauwereyns. (2009). Induction of empathy by the smell of anxiety. PLoS ONE 4.6, E5987.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J. (2005). Linguistic interpretation and cognition. In: E. Croitoru, D. Tuchel & M. Praisler (Eds.), Cultural matrix reloaded. Romanian Society for English and American Studies Seventh International Conference (pp. 36–64). Bucarest: Didactica Si Pedagogica.
Schaller, M., & Maass, A. (1989). Illusory correlation and social categorization: Toward an integration of motivational and cognitive factors in stereotype formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 709–721.
Skinner, W. A., R. D. Mathews, and R. M. Parkhurst. (1962). Alarm reaction of the top smelt Atherinops affinis (Ayres). Science 1381, 681–682.
Spears, Russell, & Manstead, A. S. R. (1989). The social context of stereotyping and differentiation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19(2), 101–121.
Sprott, Richard L. (1969). “Fear communication” via odor in inbred mice. Psychological Report, 251, 263–268.
Tajfel, Henri. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Biosocial Science Suppl, 11, 173–191.
. (1981). Human groups and social categories: studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, John R. (2003). Category extension by metonymy and metaphor. In: Dirven, René & Pörings, Ralf (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 323–348). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Wisman, Arnaud, and IlanShrira. (2015). The Smell of Death: Evidence That Putrescine Elicits Threat Management Mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 61, 1274.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 351, 151–175.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
