Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 8:1 (2021) ► pp.85–108

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Our metaphorical minds

Language as cultural manifestations

ORCiD logo with link | National Taiwan University
Published online: 8 September 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00067.su
Abstract
Aside from metaphor being an important language device reflecting human cognition, it also provides a window into the understanding of culture (Kovecses, Zoltan. (2019). Some consequences of a multi-level view of metaphor. In Ferrando (Ed.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp. 19–33). Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar). Language is a function of culture because it is a form of the verbal and nonverbal systems by which a group member can communicate with another member. Language connects people of the same cultural identity because it functions as a common bond between people who have the same linguistic heritage. As argued in Verhagen, Frans C. (2008). Worldviews and metaphors in the human-nature relationship: An ecolinguistic exploration through the ages. Language and Ecology, 2(3), 1–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, values of one’s understanding of the world he lives in may in turn be influenced by the conceptual metaphors he unconsciously holds to visualize his world. Verhagen has provided a valuable standpoint, yet it is western-centered and European-oriented. Through metaphors identified in Chinese in proverbs, food, marriage, and time expressions, this paper intends to address the following questions: Does conceptual metaphors reflect any specific Chinese mode of thinking? Does such conceptualization give a taste of Chinese culture? What kind(s) of theoretical and pragmatic implications can be derived from our line of investigation? It is thus hoped that this paper may provide empirical evidence with reference to mappings between thought and language, which in turn, may serve as a way to explore culture.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Some basic concepts and methodology
    • 2.1Theoretical background
      • 2.1.1Reframing
      • 2.1.2Mental spaces and conceptual blending
    • 2.2Methodology
      • 2.2.1A cognitive approach
      • 2.2.2Data
  • 3.Metaphors and conceptualization
    • 3.1Marriage
    • 3.2Food
    • 3.3Time
      • 3.3.1Time and space
      • 3.3.2time is water
  • 4.Towards a cultural model
    • 4.1Language and culture
    • 4.2Proverbs: A window to culture
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
References (40)
References
Ahrens, Kathleen. (1999). Conceptual metaphors: From mapping principles to knowledge representation. Manuscript.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cattani, Adelino. (2007). The duty, right and pleasure of debating in Western culture. In Marcelo Dascal & Han-liang Chang (Eds.), Traditions of controversy (pp. 125–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Johnathan. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor Analysis. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiang, Wen-yu & Sheng-hsiu Chiu. (2007). The conceptualization of STATE: A comparative study of metaphors in the R.O.C. (Taiwan) and U.S. Constitutions. Concentric, 33(1), 19–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Wei-guang. (2004). The Chinese conceptualization of time revisited. Contemporary Linguistics, 6(2), 110–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Thome H. (1957). The Chinese view of life. Hong Kong: The Union Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental space: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Mapping in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Mark Turner. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 221, 133–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–138). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frake, G. (1977). Playing frames can be dangerous. Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development, 11, 1–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). Figurative thought and figurative language. In Gernsbacker, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr. Raymond W. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In Raymond Gibbs & Gerard Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1993). English grammar: A function-based introduction. 21 Vols. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodenough, W. (1957). Cultural anthropology and linguistics. In Gavin (Ed.), Report of the 7th Round Table meeting on linguistics and language study (pp. 167–173). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graesser, A., Long, D., & Mio, J. (1989). What are the cognitive and conceptual components of humorous texts? Poetics, 181, 143–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, Robert. (1985). Some implications of metaphor for philosophy and psychology of science. In W. Paprotte & R. Dirven (Eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor: Metaphor in language and thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Chun-chieh & Zurcher, Erik. (1995). Cultural notions of Space and Time in China. In Chun-chieh Huang & Erik Zurcher (Eds.), Time and space in Chinese culture (pp. 3–16). Leiden, New York: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1980). Culture and inference: A Trobriand case study. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, Paul. (1983). Language competence and folk theories of language: Two English hedges. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 128–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keesing, R. (1974). Theories of culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 73–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kovecses, Zoltan. (2019). Some consequences of a multi-level view of metaphor. In Ferrando (Ed.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp. 19–33). Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (2012). Linguistic manifestations of the space-time (dis)analogy. In L. Filipovic & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures: Language, culture and cognition (pp. 191–215). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Shu-hsien. (2006). On the formation of a philosophy of time and history through the Yijing. In Chun-chieh Huang & John B. Henderson (Eds.), Notions of time in Chinese historical thinking (pp. 75–94). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mieder, W. (1985). A proverb is a short sentence of wisdom. Proverbium 21, 109–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pillio, H., Barlow, J., Fine, H. & Pollio, M. (1977). Psychology and the poetics of growth: Figurative language in psychology, psychotherapy and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reddy, M. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, Lily I-wen. (2002). What can metaphors tell us about culture? Language and Linguistics, 3(3), 589–613.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2016). Metaphor and thought: Conceptualization of time in Chinese. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Conceptualizations of time (pp. 187–204). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1992). English metaphors for language: Motivations, conventions, and creativity. Poetics Today, 131, 705–724. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, Frans C. (2008). Worldviews and metaphors in the human-nature relationship: An ecolinguistic exploration through the ages. Language and Ecology, 2(3), 1–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Chen, Chuanhong & Xu Wen
2024. Metaphorical richness. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:2 ► pp. 334 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue