Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Aspects of Information Structure and Flow
Edited by Wei-lun Lu and Jirí Lukl
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:2] 2020
► pp. 307–333

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Cognitive-functional principles and Chinese linear order

The containment schema

 | Ca’Foscari University of Venice | The University of Sydney
Published online: 1 October 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00059.mor
Abstract
In Modern Standard Chinese, word order patterns and constructions are motivated by factors and restrictions connected to different levels of linguistic organization, including not only semantics and syntax, but also pragmatics, information-structure, and the conceptual domain. The functional and the cognitive paradigms have offered distinct but complementary perspectives capable of accounting for word order patterns and regularities related to either the topic-prominent nature of Chinese or the iconic dimension of its grammar. This article shows how cognitive and functional aspects are in fact tightly intertwined and display significant and not yet fully explored parallelisms. Specifically, it looks into the notions of ‘frame’, ‘scope’, and ‘part’, features shared by both functional accounts of topic-comment structures and conceptually motivated word order principles. It proposes a qualitative corpus analysis of such notions and shows that first, Chinese topics are better defined in terms of frames; second, a number of word order regularities can be accounted for with a single cognitive-functional schema, which I refer to as frame-part, or frame-participant, which is connected to the image schema of containment. This article hopes to contribute to bridging the gap between functional studies on information structure in Chinese and perspectives offered by the cognitive approach to linguistic structures, and to offer effective tools for Chinese as a second language acquisition.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The notions of frame, scope, and part in the two approaches
    • 2.1The functional approach
    • 2.2The cognitive approach
  • 3.Assumptions and methodological remarks
  • 4.Topics as frame-setters
  • 5.Topic recursion, frame-setting, and visual field
  • 6.A unified account: Linearization pattern of the containment schema in Chinese
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (50)
References
Amorapanth, P., et al. (2012). Language, perception, and the schematic representation of spatial relations. Brain and Language, 120(3), 226–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barry, R. (1975). Topic in Chinese: An overlap of meaning, grammar and discourse function. In R. Grossman et al. (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism (pp. 1–9). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biq, Y.-O., Tai, J. H.-Y., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Recent developments in functional approaches to Chinese. In C.-T. J. Huang & A. Y.-H. Li (Eds.), New horizons in Chinese Linguistics (pp. 97–140). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. In C. Li (Eds.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Y. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chappell, H. (1996). Inalienability and the personal domain in Mandarin Chinese discourse. In H. Chappell & W. McGregor (Eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the part-whole relation (pp. 465–528). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, P. (1996). Pragmatic interpretation of structural topic and relativization in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 261, 389–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, R. (1995). Communicative dynamism and word order in Mandarin Chinese. Language Sciences, 17(2), 201–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Lee, P., & Pan, H. (2016). Topic and focus marking in Chinese. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp. 733–752). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, R. L. (1967). Universe-scope relations and Mandarin noun phrases. Project on linguistic analysis, Series 2, (3) (pp. 1–182). Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chu, C. (屈承熹) (1999). Hanyu renzhi gongneng yufa 汉语认知功能语法 (Cognitive-functional grammar of Mandarin Chinese). Taipei: The Crane Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, H. M. (1993). Schematic values of the Japanese nominal particles “wa” and “ga.” In R. A. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and mental processing in language (pp. 371–397). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1992). Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Güldemann, T., Zerbian, S., & Zimmermann, M. (2015). Variation in information structure with special reference to Africa. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1), 155–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1978). Conditionals are topics. Language, 54(3), 564–589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). Introduction. In J. Haiman (Eds.), Iconicity in syntax: Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, June 24–6, 1983. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Her, O.-S. (1991). Topic as a grammatical function in Chinese. Lingua, 84(1), 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ho, Y. (1993). Aspects of discourse structure in Mandarin Chinese. Lewiston, Queenston, and Lampeter: Mellen University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hockett, C. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Householder, F. W., & Cheng, R. L. (1967). Universe-scope relations in Chinese and Japanese. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, W. (1995). Functional perspectives and Chinese word order. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Y. (2000). Anaphora: A cross-linguistic approach. Vol. 31. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmer, S., Barlow, M. (2000). Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In S. Kemmer & M. Barlow (Eds.), Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford (Calif.): Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LaPolla, R. J. (1995). Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1976). Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In C. N. Li (Eds.), Subject and topic (pp. 457–489). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, W. (2005). The topic chains in Chinese: A discourse analysis and application in language teaching. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loar, J. K. (2011). Chinese syntactic grammar: Functional and conceptual principles. New York: Peter Lang Pub Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morbiato, A. (2018). How subjective is the subject? Annali Di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Orientale, 54(1), 319–348.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Conceptual word order principles and Mandarin Chinese grammar. In C. Shei (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oakley, T. (2010). Image schemas. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, W. (2015). New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, E. F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Eds.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–255). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pu, M. (2019). Zero anaphora and topic chain in Chinese discourse. In C. Shei (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. (1988). Word order rules. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tai, J. H. (1985). Temporal sequence and word order in Chinese. In J. Haiman (Eds.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Toward a cognition-based functional grammar of Chinese. In J. Tai & F. Hsueh (Eds.), Functionalism and Chinese grammar, 11, (pp. 187–226). South Orange, NJ: Chinese Language Teachers Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Iconicity: Motivations in Chinese grammar. In M. Eid & G. Iverson (Eds.), Principles and prediction: The analysis of natural language (pp. 153–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, H. (1996). Units in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse, and grammar. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsao, F. (曹逢甫) (1985). Zhuti zai hanyu zhong de gongneng yanjiu 主题在汉语中的功能研究——迈向语段分析的第一步 (A functional study of topic in Chinese). Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Sentence and clause structure in Chinese: A Functional perspective. Taipei, Taiwan: Student Book Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Prince, K. (2012). Predication and information structure in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 21(4), 329–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, G. (1998). Information structure in Chinese. Peking: Peking University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, L. (2015). Topic prominence. In W. Wang, & C. Sun (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of Chinese Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue