Cover not available

Article published In: Visual Metaphors
Edited by Réka Benczes and Veronika Szelid
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1] 2020
► pp. 141–167

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Applications of visual and linguistic metaphor

Visual metaphor and its narrative function

Jacek Malczewski’s parabolic painting

 | Maria Curie-Skłodowska University
Published online: 19 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00052.het
Abstract
The paper aims at analyzing visual metaphors and allegories in the fine arts – particularly in the symbolic paintings by J. Malczewski – as creative tools of both artistic expression and discourse storytelling in which they play a vital role. Visual metaphors are suggestive and effective in artistic performance and, therefore, in communicating abstract ideas to the individual viewer and the public. Such paintings (symbolic and surrealistic), whilst encompassing concrete (source) and universal (target) domains in their depicted metaphoric structures, can be powerful enough to create possible and alternative courses of events. Based on the analysis of R. Arnheim’s concept of openness of fine art works, J. Bruner’s theory of narrative mind, storytelling and possible worlds, and Ch. Forceville’s analyses of visual metaphors, the paper will attempt to answer the following two philosophical and epistemological questions: (1) how universal themes are depicted, perceived, conveyed, and comprehended in metaphorical paintings; and (2) what is the difference between the structures of the visual metaphors characteristic for these paintings and merely literary parabolic means. Both conceptual metaphors and blending theories are used in the analyses of selected symbolic and metaphoric paintings by Malczewski to explain in what scope his painting methods and their narrative structures are entangled in Polish national-cultural history, and how important they are in cognitive studies as well as in the history and theory of fine arts.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphors which we perceive and embrace
  • 3.Perceptual metaphors in fine arts: Their structure and functions
  • 4.Narrative perceptual metaphors and possible worlds
  • 5.Time structure of painting works
  • 6.Narrative minds in possible worlds of art
  • 7.Jacek Malczewski and narrative pictorial metaphors
    • Summary
  • Notes
  • References
References (20)
References
Arnheim, R. (1971). Entropy and art: An essay on disorder and order. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1974). Art and visual perception: Psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, Ch. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 341, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. (1960). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. London: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingarden, R. (1958). O budowie obrazu [On painting picture construction]. In R. Ingarden, Studia z estetyki [Studies in aesthetics] (pp. 7–111). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juszczak, W. (1979). Narracja i przestrzeń w malarstwie Malczewskiego [Narrative and space in Malczewski’s painting]. In W. Juszczak, Fakty i wyobraźnia [Facts and imagination] (pp. 128–156). Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. M. (1982). Metaphor in pictures. Perception, 111, 589–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Metaphor and art. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 447–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ławniczakowa, A. (1990). Malczewski: A vision of Poland. London: Barbican Art Gallery.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marks, T. (1996). On perceptual metaphor. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11(1), 39–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, J. K. (1998). What is “Chinese Narrative Illustration”? The Art Bulletin, 80, issue 4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in the visual arts: Papers in and on art history. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Somov, G. (2010). Concepts and senses in visual art: Through the example of analysis of some works by Bruegel the Elder. Semiotica, 1821, 475–506.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G., (Ed.). (2018). Visual metaphor: Structure and process. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue