Cover not available

Article published In: Visual Metaphors
Edited by Réka Benczes and Veronika Szelid
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1] 2020
► pp. 78–110

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Applications of visual and linguistic metaphor

Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy

A study of Iranian and Dutch print advertisements

 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
Published online: 19 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00050.kas
Abstract
Conceptual Metaphor Theory’s central idea that metaphor is a figure of thought rather than a figure of language has led to the examination of non-verbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphor. Over the past twenty years, the verbal trope of metonymy has similarly been theorized from a conceptual point of view, but the implications of this work for visual studies have only begun to be examined. Investigating visual manifestations of metonymy will moreover also improve our understanding of visual metaphor, as often these latter depend on, and interact with, metonymies. In this paper we propose to explore the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in the visual/multimodal realm of print advertising, using Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Díez, O. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar typology, and building on Paula Peréz-Sobrino’s (2017) applications of this typology. Our twofold aim is (1) to see if, and if so, how, all patterns of this typology appear in ads; and (2) to investigate a number of Iranian and Dutch print advertisements in which metaphor and metonymy interact. Analyzing ads from two cultures will enable us to demonstrate how cultural background knowledge is essential for understanding metaphor-metonymy interactions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Conceptual metonymy
  • 3.Types of metonymy
    • 3.1Source-in-target
    • 3.2Target-in-source
  • 4.Metaphor and metonymy in interaction
    • 4.1Metonymic expansion of a metaphoric source
    • 4.2Metonymic expansion of a metaphoric target
    • 4.3Metonymic reduction of a metaphoric source
    • 4.4Metonymic reduction of a metaphoric target
  • 5.Metonymic complexes
    • 5.1Double domain expansion
    • 5.2Double domain reduction
    • 5.3Domain expansion plus domain reduction
    • 5.4Domain reduction plus domain expansion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • References
References (38)
References
Barcelona, A. (Ed.). (2000). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, C., Konijn, E., & Steen, G. (2016). Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (1994). Visual metaphor. In J. Hintikka (Ed.), Aspects of metaphor (pp. 189–218). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornevin, V., & Forceville, C. (2017). From metaphor to allegory: The Japanese manga Afuganisu-tan. Metaphor and the Social World, 7(2), 235–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R., & Pörings, R. (Eds.). (2002). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, D., & O’Halloran, K. (2015). The visual representation of metaphor: A social semiotic approach. In M. J. Sanz (Ed.), Multimodality and cognitive linguistics (pp. 99–114). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (1988). The case for pictorial metaphor: René Magritte and other Surrealists. In A. Erjavec, (ed.) Vestnik IX, 1, 150–160. Institut za Marksisticne Studije, Ljubljana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. Ruiz de Mendoza (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In E. McQuarrie & B. Phillips (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric (pp. 272–310). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In E. Ventola & A. J. Moya Guijjaro (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: multisemiotic issues (pp. 56–74). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor. In N.-M. Klug & H. Stöckl (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext [The Language in Multimodal Contexts Handbook] (pp. 241–260). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017a). Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising: Cultural perspectives. Styles of Communication, 9 (2), 26–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). From image schema to metaphor in discourse: The force schemas in animation films. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 239–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E., (Eds) (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guan, Y., & Forceville, C. (2020). Making cross-cultural meaning in five Chinese promotional clips: Metonymies and metaphors. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17(2), 123–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 101, 315–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1993). Reference-point construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I., & Waugh, L. (2009). Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 329–358). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). High-level cognitive models: In search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behaviour. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on metonymy (pp. 11–30). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Díez, O. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Galera-Masegosa, A. (2011). Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 31, 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tseronis, A., & Forceville, C. (2017). The argumentative relevance of visual and multimodal antithesis in Frederick Wiseman’s documentaries. In A. Tseronis & C. Forceville (Eds.), Multimodal argumentation and rhetoric in media genres (pp. 165–188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Nonverbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphors and metonymies: A case study. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 119–143). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Hidalgo-Downing, Laura
2025. Creative visual and multimodal metonymy in non-commercial advertisements on substance use. Metaphor and the Social World 15:2 ► pp. 288 ff. DOI logo
Türker, Ebru & Jae Hyun Park
2025. Multimodal Metaphoric Creativity, Framing, and Recontextualization in Education Discourse: University Advertisements in South Korea. Metaphor and Symbol 40:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2024. Taboo metaphtonymy, gender, and impoliteness: how male and female Arab cartoonists think and draw. Social Semiotics 34:3 ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Elyamany, Nashwa & Maha SalahEldien Mohamed Hamed
2024. Metaphtonymy and semio-cognitive de-legitimation of Donald Trump in the meme discourse of The Daily Show with Trevor Noah (January 2016–December 2019). International Journal of Language and Culture 11:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Birello, Marilisa & Joan-Tomàs Pujolà
2023. Visual metaphors and metonymies in pre-service teachers’ reflections: Beliefs and experiences in the learning and teaching of writing. Teaching and Teacher Education 122 ► pp. 103971 ff. DOI logo
Esbrí Blasco, Montserrat
2023. Review of Pérez-Sobrino, Littlemore & Ford (2021): Unpacking Creativity: The Power of Figurative Communication in Advertising. Metaphor and the Social World 13:1 ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Niamh A. O’Dowd
2023. Code Red for Humanity: Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Noncommercial Advertisements on Environmental Awareness and Activism. Metaphor and Symbol 38:3 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Iju
2023. Winespeak in wine’s pics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Jahameh, Haifaa & Aseel Zibin
2023. The use of monomodal and multimodal metaphors in advertising Jordanian and American food products on Facebook: A comparative study. Heliyon 9:5 ► pp. e15178 ff. DOI logo
Juzelėnienė, Saulė & Aistė Stvolaitė
2023. Multimodal Representations of Lithuanian Brands: The Case of “Džiugas”, “Rūta” and “Pieno žvaigždės”. Respectus Philologicus :44 (49) ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Yuan, Xiaoben
2023. Metaphors and metonymies in the multimodal discourse of whaling. Metaphor and the Social World 13:2 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
李, 成
2023. Ecology Loss in Biomass Energy Comics: A Critical Analysis of Multi-Modal Metaphor. Modern Linguistics 11:05 ► pp. 2193 ff. DOI logo
Guan, Yue & Charles Forceville
2020. Making cross-cultural meaning in five Chinese promotion clips: Metonymies and metaphors. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Cun & Charles Forceville
2020. Metaphor and metonymy in Chinese and American political cartoons (2018–2019) about the Sino-US trade conflict. Pragmatics & Cognition 27:2 ► pp. 474 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue