Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 6:2 (2019) ► pp.325–353
An integrated study of visual metaphors in Chinese editorial cartoons
Published online: 4 February 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00043.niu
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00043.niu
Abstract
Conceptual metaphor theory highlights that metaphor is a matter of thinking. This assumption indicates that
metaphors exist not only in language, but also in other modes. This study examines uses of visual and visual-verbal metaphors in
50 Chinese editorial cartoons conceptualizing serious haze problem, with the intention of eliciting implicit meaning conveyed by
visual signs alone or together with verbal texts. Both conceptual and critical discourse analysis of the metaphors are conducted.
The study finds that the way a metaphor is realized visually and verbally in a cartoon determines the features mapped onto the
topic, and further implicitly expresses a critical stance toward the topic under discussion. The metaphors in the cartoons evoke a
general understanding of haze problem by activating the war scenario and familiar cultural or social context in viewers. It is
found in this corpus that visual fusion and visual replacement are the most frequent kinds of visual metaphors. The study further
affirms that visual metaphors are better in conveying rich and implicit conceptual and affective meaning, and can be direct
manifestation of the conceptual metaphor without the mediation of language. In sum the study suggests the need for an integrated
approach to visual metaphoric representation in multimodal analysis.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 3.Method
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Target domain: haze
- 4.2Target domain: victim
- 4.3Target domain: stakeholders
- 4.4Target domain: control action
- 4.5Others
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1War scenario
- 5.2Visual techniques and verbal messages
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (50)
Bateman, J. A. (2008). Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Bortoluzzi, M. (2009). Towards a framework of critical multimodal analysis: Emotion in a film trailer. In A. Esposito & R. Vích (Eds.), Cross-modal analysis (pp. 50–62). Spring-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bounegru, L. & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10 (2), 209–229.
Brooks, P. H. (1977). The role of action lines in children’s memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 231, 98–107.
Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalizing “metaphor” for applied linguistic research. In L. Cameron, & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 21, 75–95.
(2009). Metaphors in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in discourse analysis (pp. 53–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2006). Semiosis, ideology and mediation: A dialectical view. In I. Lassen, J. Strunck & T. Vestergaard (Eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies (pp. 19–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Forceville, C. (1994). Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9 (1), 1–29.
Forcevillie, C. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (1), 1–14.
(2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. K. M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. J. R. de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphors in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2016). Visual and multimodal metaphor in film: Charting the field. In K. Fahlenbrach (Ed.), Embodied metaphors in film, television and video games: Cognitive approaches (pp. 17–32). London: Routledge.
Franklin, M. B. (1988). Museum of the mind: An inquiry into the titling of artworks. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3 (3), 157–174.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., Lima, P. L. C., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 361, 1189–1210.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2008). Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. In R. W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 3–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gombrich, E. H. (1971). The cartoonist’s armoury. In E. H. Gombrich (Ed.), Meditations on a hobby horse and other essays on the theory of art (pp. 127–142). London: Phaidon.
Hall, S. (1997). The spectacle of the “other”. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practice (pp. 223–279). London: Sage.
Janzen, T. (2006). Visual communication: Signed language and cognition. In G. K. M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. J. R. de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 359–377). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jewitt, C. (2009). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 14–27). London: Routledge.
Johnson, M. (2007). The Meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
(2008). Metaphor and art. In R. W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 447–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, J. M., Green, C. D., & Vervaeke, J. (1993). Metaphoric thought and devices in pictures. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8 (3), 243–255.
Kress, G. (2000). Text as the punctuation of semiosis: Pulling at some of the threads. In U. H. Meinhof & J. Smith (Eds.), Intertextuality and the media: From genre to everyday life (pp. 132–154). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Mark, T. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lan, C., & Zuo, D. (2015). Pictorial-verbal metaphors in Chinese editorial cartoons on food safety. Metaphor and the Social World, 11, 20–51.
Lassen, I., Strunck, J., & Vestergaard, T. (2006). Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lim, F. V. (2004). Developing an integrative multi-semiotic Model. In K. L. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis, (pp. 220–245). London: Continuum.
Lin, T. Y., & Chiang, W. (2015). Multimodal fusion in analyzing political cartoons: Debates on U.S. beef imports into Taiwan. Metaphor and Symbol, 301, 137–161.
Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2016). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising: A Corpus-based account. Metaphor and symbol, 31 (2), 73–90.
Phillips, B. J. and McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing theory, 41, 113–136.
Schilperoord, J., & Maes, A. (2009). Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 213–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Suler, J., & Zakia, R. D. (2018). Perception and imaging: Photography as a way of seeing. New York and London: Routledge.
Teng, N. Y., & Sun, S. (2002). Grouping, simile, and oxymoron in pictures: A design-based cognitive approach. Metaphor and Symbol, 17 (4), 295–316.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Xi, Rui
Boubakri, Awatef
2023. Visual art, discourse, and Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1 ► pp. 227 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
