Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 6:2 (2019) ► pp.354–369
An algebraic perspective on abstract and concrete domains
Published online: 4 February 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00036.kha
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00036.kha
Abstract
Looking at isomorphic constructs from an algebraic perspective, this article suggests that every concrete
construct is understood by reference to an underlying abstract schema in the mind of comprehender. The complex form of every
abstract schema is created by the gradual development of its elementary form. Throughout the process of cognitive development, new
features are added to the elementary form of abstract schema, which leads to gradual formation of a fully-developed abstract
schema. Every developed abstract schema is the underlying source for understanding an infinite number of concrete isomorphic
constructs. It is suggested that the process of the mapping of base domain (base construct) unto target domain (target construct)
is conducted and mediated by an abstract domain. This abstract domain, which is free from concrete features of base and target, is
isomorphic to both base and target domains. To describe the mediatory role of this abstract domain, it might be argued that the
chain process of understanding a less familiar domain in terms of a relatively more familiar domain (salience imbalance model)
cannot continue infinitely. This chain must stop at some point. This point is the abstract domain, which is isomorphic to base and
target domains.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Isomorphic constructs
- 3.Isomorphic constructs in mathematics
- 4.Concrete and abstract domains
- 5.Conceptual metaphor theory and chain of domains
- 6.Concrete realization of abstract domains
- 7.Pairs of domains throughout the chains
- 8.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
References
References (19)
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (1999). Metaphor comprehension: From comparison to Categorization. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of twenty-first annual conference of cognitive science society (pp. 90–95). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 411, 1–63.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 71, 155–170.
Indurkhya, B. (1987). Approximate semantic transference: A computational theory of metaphor and analogy. Cognitive Science, 111, 445–480.
Judson, T. W. (2012). Abstract Algebra. [URL]
Khatin-Zadeh, O., & Vahdat, S. (2015). Abstract and concrete representations in structure-mapping and class-inclusion. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2(2), 349–360.
Khatin-Zadeh, O., Vahdat, S., & Yazdani-Fazlabadi, B. (2016). An Algebraic Perspective on Implicit and Explicit Knowledge. Cognitive Linguistics Studies, 3(1), 151–162.
Kitty, E. F., & Lehrer, A. (1981). Semantic fields and the structure of metaphor. Studies in Language, 51, 31–63.
Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., & Taylor, K. I. (2007). Conceptual structure. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 217–234). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor, language, and thought. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 1–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ortony, A., Vondruska, R. J., Foss, M. A., & Jones, L. E. (1985). Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 241, 569–594.
Taylor, K. I., Devereux, B. J., & Tyler, L. K. (2011). Conceptual structure: Towards an integrated neurocognitive account. Language and Cognitive processes, 26(9), 1368–1401.
Tyler, L. K., & Moss, H. E. (2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 51, 244–252.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Zahra Eskandari, Florencia Reali, Hassan Banaruee & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2023. Are metaphorical classes essentially abstract?. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
