Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 6:1 (2019) ► pp.130–157

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Communicating attitudes through metaphor

A case study of euro adoption

 | Vilnius University
Published online: 12 July 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00033.cib
Abstract
Metaphor analysis in real-world discourse is increasingly becoming the focus of many cognitive studies. Accordingly, this paper seeks to investigate how euro adoption in Lithuania in 2015 was metaphorically communicated by the media. The study is carried out within the framework of Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA), which was developed by Charteris-Black, J. (2005 & 2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, (2008). What can critical metaphor analysis add to the understanding of racist ideology? Recent studies of Hitler’s antisemitic metaphors. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 2 (2), 1–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science. New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar. Thus, a three-step metaphor analysis procedure (Identified→ Interpreted→ Explained) was employed in order to analyze the attitude towards euro adoption presented in Lithuanian media. The findings show that the euro is most frequently conceptualized as a living organism with different scenarios (active agent and passive agent) being realized linguistically. In the final stage – explanation – metaphors were analyzed from a rhetorical perspective, which means that an attempt was made to look into how metaphors communicate positive or negative attitudes about euro adoption in the media. The results demonstrate that personification of the euro makes the idea of euro adoption more understandable, it activates a range of emotions and evaluates it. This leads to further insights about the way the media exercises its power in an attempt to persuade people and manipulate their attitudes, emotions and opinions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphor in economic discourse
  • 3.Corpus
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.The identification and interpretation of metaphors
  • 6.Personification of the euro
    • 6.1The journey scenario
    • 6.2The scenario of exerting power
    • 6.3The scenario of the euro as an affected participant
    • 6.4The scenario of transitory state: from active to passive, from passive to active
    • 6.5The scenario of relationships
  • 7.Metaphor explanation: Conveying attitudes
  • 8.Concluding reflections
  • Notes
  • References
  • Sources
References (44)
References
Anthony, L. (2016). AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Arcimavičienė, L. (2009). Economy metaphors: What associated conceptions underlie Lithuanian business? Respectus Philologicus, 15 (20), 143–153.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arrese, A. (2015). Euro crisis metaphors in the Spanish press. Communication & Society, 28 (2), 19–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2005 & 2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J., & Ennis, T. (2001). A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes, 201, 249–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J., & Musolff, A. (2003). ‘Battered hero’ or ‘innocent victim’? A comparative study of metaphors for euro trading in British and German financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes, 22 (2), 153–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, S. F., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C. R. (2003). economy is a person: A Chinese-English corpora and ontological-based comparison using the Conceptual Mapping Model. Proceedings of the ROCLING XV R.O.C. Computational Linguistics Conference XV1, 87–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, S. F., Ahrens, K., Huang, C. R. (2004). recession: Defining source domains through WordNet and SUMO. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of Korea (LSK) International Conference, Vol. 21, 43–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2002). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Landtsheer, C. (2009). Collecting meaning from the count of metaphor. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse, (pp. 59–78). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eubanks, P. (2012). The perfect storm: An imperfect metaphor. In M. White & H. Herrera-Soler (Eds.), Metaphor and mills: Figurative language in business and economics (pp. 225–242). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., Leggitt, J. S., & Turner, E. A. (2014). What’s special about figurative language in emotional communication? In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions. Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 125–150). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science. New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jäkel, O. (2003). Motion metaphorized in the economic domain. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven & K. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language (pp. 297–318). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joris, W., d’Haenens, L., & Van Gorp, B. (2014). The battle for the euro: Metaphors and frames in the euro crisis news. European Journal of Communication, 29 (5), 608–617. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2014). Cognitive linguistics and ideology. In J. Littlemore, & J. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics, (pp. 234–252). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2008). Metaphor and emotion. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 380–396). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980, 2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, A. M. R., & Llopis, M. Á. O. (2010). Metaphorical pattern analysis in financial texts: Framing the crisis in positive or negative metaphorical terms. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 3300–3313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor in political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). What can critical metaphor analysis add to the understanding of racist ideology? Recent studies of Hitler’s antisemitic metaphors. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 2 (2), 1–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicaise, L. (2010). Metaphor in the context of use: A multidimensional approach. Metaphor and Symbol, 251, 63–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connor, K. T. (1998). Money and finance as solid, liquid and gas in Spanish. Metaphor and Symbol, 13 (2), 141–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Mara-Shimek, M., Guillén-Parra, M., & Ortega-Larrea, A. (2015). Stop the bleeding or weather the storm? Crisis solution marketing and the ideological use of metaphor in online financial reporting of the stock market crash of 2008 at the New York Stock Exchange. Discourse & Communication, 9 (1), 103–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2002). A sturdy baby or derailing train? Metaphorical representations of the euro in British and Italian newspapers. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 22 (1), 107–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G., et al., (2010). A Method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skorczynska, H., & Deignan, A. (2006). Readership and purpose in the choice of economic metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 2 (12), 87–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urbonaitė, J., & Šeškauskienė, I. (2007). health metaphor in political and economic discourse: A cross linguistic analysis. Kalbų studijos / Studies about Languages, 111, 98–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waugh, L. R., Fonseca-Greber, B., Vickers, C., & Eröz, B. (2006). Multiple empirical approaches to a complex analysis of discourse. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 120–148). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, M. (2003). Metaphor and economics: The case of growth. English for Specific Purposes, 221, 131–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its development. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sources
balsas.lt
delfi.lt
lrytas.lt
respublika.lt
vakarozinios.lt
15min.lt
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ramonienė, Meilutė
2024. Development of Applied Linguistics. Lietuvių kalba ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue