Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 6:1 (2019) ► pp.84–102
Death in a multicultural society
Metaphor, language and religion in Singapore obituaries
Published online: 12 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00031.tay
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00031.tay
Abstract
Obituaries are a tractable source of metaphorical depictions of death, which in turn offer unique insights into
the near-universality versus culture and context-specificity of metaphors. In multicultural settings, they can shed further light
on the underexplored question of how metaphor use interacts with linguistic and religious identities. This paper is a case study
of newspaper obituaries (N = 337) in the multicultural and multilingual context of Singapore. It uses a
mixed-methods approach to uncover the types of death-related metaphors across languages and religions, their near-universal and
culture-specific aspects, and significant associations between religion and metaphor use/non-use (χ² (2,
N = 337) = 84.54, p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.501, Log
(BF10) = 47.14), language and metaphor use/non-use (χ² (1, N = 337) = 71.2,
p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.46, Log (BF10) = 42.25), and religion and language
of the deceased (χ² (2, N = 337) = 48.11, p < 0.001, Cramer’s
V = 0.378, Log (BF10) = 19.7). The findings extend prevailing discussion from the substantive
contents of metaphors to the intra-societal pragmatics of their use, connecting metaphor explicitly with the construction of
religious and linguistic identities.
Keywords: obituaries, death, metaphor, religion, identity construction
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and methodology
- 2.1Corpus of obituaries
- 2.2Metaphor identification
- 2.3Coding
- 2.4Analysis
- 3.Findings and discussion
- 3.1Common image-schematic grounding of death-related metaphors
- 3.2Variability in death-related metaphors
- 3.3Relationships between metaphor use, religious identity, and language choice
- 3.4The relationship between religion and metaphor use
- 3.5The relationship between language and metaphor use
- 3.6The relationship between religion and language of obituaries
- 4.Conclusion
References
References (38)
Alfano, M., Higgins, A., & Levernier, J. (2018). Identifying virtues and values through obiturary data-mining. J Value Inquiry, 521, 59–79.
Cheung, W., & Ho, S. (2004). The use of death metaphors to understand personal meaning of death among Hong Kong Chinese undergraduates. Death Studies, 28(1), 47–62.
de Vries, B., & Rutherford, J. (2004). Memorializing loved ones on the World Wide Web. Omega: Journal of Death & Dying, 49(1), 5–26.
Department of Statistics Singapore. (2015). General Household Survey. Retrieved from [URL]
Fernández, E. C. (2006). The language of death: euphemism and conceptual metaphorization in Victorian obituaries. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 191, 101–130.
Frank, R. M. (2008). Introduction: Sociocultural situatedness. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, Language and Mind. Volume 2: Sociocultural Situatedness (pp. 1–18). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gilbert, N. (1993). Analyzing Tabular Data. Loglinear and Logistic Models for Social Researchers. London: UCL Press.
Goh, R. (2009). Christian identities in Singapore: religion, race and culture between state controls and transnational flows. Journal of Cultural Geography, 26(1), 1–23.
Harvey, P. (2013). An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howe, J. (2008). Argument is argument: an essay on conceptual metaphor and verbal dispute. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(1), 1–23.
Jamil, T., Ly, A., Morey, R. D., Love, J., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2017). Default “Gunel and Dickey” Bayes factors for contingency tables. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 638–652.
Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting bayes factors. Journal of Problem Solving, 71, 2–9.
Johnson, M. (2005). The philosophical significance of image schemas. In B. Hampe & J. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 15–34). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kimmel, M. (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(1), 97–115.
(2012). Optimizing the analysis of metaphor in discourse: How to make the most of qualitative software and find a good research design. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 1–48.
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion. Language, culture and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2015). Where wetaphors come from. Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenges to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lawuyi, O. B. (1991). The social marketing of elites: the advertised self in obituaries and congratulations in some Nigerian dailies. Africa, 61(2), 247–263.
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (1996). To die, to sleep. A contrastive study of metaphors for death and dying in English and Spanish. Language Sciences, 18(1–2), 37–52.
McLennan, J., Stewart, C. A., Pollard, A. C., Anastasios, J., Akande, A., & McLennan, L. J. (1997). Using metaphors to assess anticipatory perceptions of personal death. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 131(3), 333–342.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A Method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Quinn, N. (1991). The cultural basis of metaphor. In J. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond metaphor: the theory of tropes in anthropology (pp. 56–93). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ross, L. M., & Pollio, H. R. (1991). Metaphors of death: A thematic analysis of personal meanings. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 23(4), 291–307.
Slingerland, E. (2003). Effortless action: Wu-wei as conceptual metaphor and spiritual ideal in Early China. New York: Oxford University Press.
Steen, G. J. (2008). When is metaphor deliberate? In Proceedings of Second Metaphor Festival. Stockholm.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Taussig, D. (2017). Your story is our story: Collective memory in obituaries of US military veterans. Memory Studies, 10(4), >459–473.
Tay, D. (2015). Metaphor in case study articles on Chinese university counseling service websites. Chinese Language and Discourse, 6(1), 28–56.
Wee, V. (1997). Buddhism in Singapore. In O. Jin Hui & T. Ern Ser (Eds.), Understanding Singapore Society (pp. 130–162). Singapore: Times Academic Press.
Yu, N. (2009). From body to meaning in culture. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Issa, Muhammad & Shumaila Shafket Ali
Heynderickx, Priscilla C., Silke Creten & Sylvain M. Dieltjens
Lu, Wei-lun
Lu, Wei-lun
2022. Viewpoint and metaphor in culture. In Visual Metaphors [Benjamins Current Topics, 124], ► pp. 263 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
