Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 5:2 (2018) ► pp.359–375
A cross-linguistic study of metaphors of death
Published online: 14 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00025.gat
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00025.gat
Abstract
The avoidance of directly addressing human mortality indicates fear of death. This fear elicits psychological, social and religious
interdictions in language such that people resort to the use of metaphors to avoid confronting death. Under the premise that
metaphor is a conceptual mapping from a concrete source to an abstract target domain, this study aims to identify and categorize
euphemistic metaphors of death in six languages: Chinese, Farsi, Gĩkũyũ, Russian, Spanish, and Swedish. Those metaphors are
interpreted via the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). In doing so, 40 speakers in each of the languages were asked to complete a
short questionnaire. Various metaphors of death were identified in each language and categorized into four conceptual metaphors:
death is a journey; death is the end; death is a rest; and death is a summons. The key finding is that the
most common metaphor of death is death is a journey. This holds across linguistic groups regardless of gender and age
factors. This study also discusses the role of embodied cognition theories in accounting for how metaphors of death are created
and their role within cognition in general.
Keywords: death, metaphors, euphemism, cognitive linguistics, metaphorical mapping, embodiment
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Conceptual metaphors and embodiment
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Materials and procedure
- 3.3Analyses
- 4.Results
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (73)
Ahrens, K. (2002). When love is not digested: Underlying reasons for source to target domain pairings in the contemporary theory of metaphor. Proceedings of the First Cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp. 273–302). Cheng-Chi University, China.
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Alm-Arvius, C. (2008). Metaphor and metonymy. In N. L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp. 3–24). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.
Ansah, G. (2010). The cultural basis of conceptual metaphors: The case of emotions in Akan and English. Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching (pp. 1–25). Lancaster University, Lancaster.
Aries, P. (1974). Western attitudes toward death: from the Middle Ages to the present. Baltimore, U.S.A.: John Hopkins University Press.
Aubed, M. M. (2011). A study of English death euphemisms with reference to their translations into Arabic: A case study. Tikrit University Journal for Humanities, 18 (2), 79–91.
Bultnick, B. (1998). Metaphors we die by: Conceptualizations of death in English and their implications for the theory of metaphor. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Cheung, W., & Ho, S. (2004). The use of death metaphors to understand personal meaning of death among Hong Kong Chinese undergraduates. Death Studies, 28(1), 47–62.
Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition, 301, 958–968.
Crespo-Fernández, E. (2006). The language of death: Euphemism and conceptual metaphorization in Victorian obituaries. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 191, 101–130.
(2008). Sex-related euphemism and dysphemism: An analysis in terms of conceptual metaphor theory. Atlantis, Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 30 (2), 95–110.
(2011). Conceptual metaphors in taboo-induced lexical variation. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 241, 53–71.
(2013). Euphemistic metaphors in English and Spanish epitaphs: A comparative study. Atlantis, Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 35 (2), 99–118.
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dudschig, C., de la Vega, I. & Kaup, B. (2015). What’s up? Emotion-specific activation of vertical space during language processing. Acta Psychologica, 1561, 143–155.
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. (2009). The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 321, 429–432.
Feldman, A., Goussev, V., Sangole, A., & Levin, M. (2007). Threshold position control and the principle of minimal interaction in motor actions. Progress in Brain Research, 1651, 267–281.
Friendly, M. (1994). Mosaic displays for multi-way contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 891, 190–200.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22 (3), 455–479.
Gathigia, M., & Ndungu, R. (2011). A cognitive linguistics analysis of Gĩkũyũ euphemisms. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Publishing House Ltd.
Gathigia, M. G., Ndungu, R. W., & Orwenjo, D. O. (2015). When romantic love in Gĩkũyũ becomes a human body part: A cognitive approach. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2 (1), 79–93.
Gibbs Jr., R. W. (2006). Introspection and cognitive linguistics: Should we trust our own intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 135–151.
Gibbs, R., & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Glenberg, A., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48 (7), 905–922.
Hampe, B., & Grady, J. E. (2005). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (Vol. 291). Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter.
Herrero Ruiz, J. (2007). At the crossroads between literature, culture, linguistics, and cognition: Death metaphors in fairy tales. Resla, 201, 59–83.
Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D. (in press). Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological Bulletin.
Johnson, M. (2005). The philosophical significance of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 15–33). Amsterdam: Mouton De Gruyter.
Khatin Zadeh, O., & Vahdat, S. (2015). Abstract and concrete representations in structure-mapping and class-inclusion. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2 (2), 349–360.
(2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and the body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2003). Language, figurative thought, and cross-cultural comparison. Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (4), 311–320.
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor, and thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8 (958.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by (1st edition). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Landau, M. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136 (6), 1045–1067.
Lee, R. (2008). Modernity, mortality and re-enchantment: The death taboo revisited. Sociology, 42 (4), 745–759.
Liu, D. (2002). Metaphor, culture, and worldview: The case of American English and the Chinese language. Lanham: University Press of America.
Machakanja, I. (2006). Conceptual metaphors in English and Shona. A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural study (Unpublished PhD Thesis), Pretoria: University of South Africa.
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (1996). To die, to sleep. A contrastive study of metaphors for death and dying in English and Spanish. Language Sciences, 18 (1–2), 37–52.
Montoro, P. R., Contreras, M. J., Elosúa, M. R., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2015). Cross-modal metaphorical mapping of spoken emotion words onto vertical space. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 (1205). .
Nayak, N. P., & Gibbs, R. (1990). Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19 (3), 315–330.
Pazzaglia, M. (2013). Action and language grounding in the sensorimotor cortex. Language and Cognition, 5 (2–3), 211–223.
Ruiz, H. (2007). At the crossroads between literature, culture, linguistics, and cognition: death metaphors in fairy tales. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 201, 59–84.
Sauciuc, G. A. (2009). The role of metaphor in the structuring of emotion concepts. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5 (1–2), 244–267.
Sayer, D. (2010). Who’s afraid of the dead? Archaeology, modernity and the death taboo. World Archaeology, 42 (3), 481–491.
Sexton, J. (1997). The semantics of death and dying: Metaphor and mortality. A Review of General Semantics, 54 (3), 333–345.
Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From mip to mipvu
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Valdorra, M., & Yohai, V. J. (2014). Robust estimators for generalized linear models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1461, 31–48.
World Medical Association (2013). Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310 (20), 2191–2194.
Xie, J., Huang, Y., Wang, R., & Liu, W. (2015). Affective valence facilitates spatial detection on vertical axis: shorter time strengthens effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(277). .
Yu, N. (2003). The bodily dimension of meaning in Chinese: What do we do and mean with “hands”? In E. H. Casad & B. P. Gray (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and non-Indo-European languages (pp. 337–362). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2009). From body to meaning in culture. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Biseko, John Misana
Dzherikh, Olena
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Zahra Eskandari, Florencia Reali, Hassan Banaruee & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2023. Are metaphorical classes essentially abstract?. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Aradi, Csenge
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Paula Pérez-Sobrino
MacRae, Suesan, Brian Duffels, Annie Duchesne, Paul D. Siakaluk & Heath E. Matheson
Toledo-Acosta, Mauricio, Talin Barreiro, Asela Reig-Alamillo, Markus Müller, Fuensanta Aroca Bisquert, Maria Luisa Barrigon, Enrique Baca-Garcia & Jorge Hermosillo-Valadez
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
