Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 5:2 (2018) ► pp.230–260
Metaphorical motion in Chinese
Published online: 14 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00020.sha
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00020.sha
Abstract
This paper focuses on metaphorical motion in the Chinese language by investigating how various abstract concepts
are construed in terms of spatial motion. The claim that the primary metaphor, change is motion, is central to metaphorical motion
is confirmed, and we further examine sorts of target domains that are structured by spatial motion, the corresponding mappings in
metaphors of entity-location pairs and orientational metaphors. Moreover, we explore how systematicity and complexity have
structured the whole system. Through systematicity, coherence between different mappings and within one mapping are analyzed, and
two concepts of “event” – event in “event-structure concepts” and in “motion event frame” are observed and are shown to be
interrelated. By means of complexity, the specific issue of entity-location duality in metaphorical motion is
discussed, and experiential bases – including physical, social and cultural basis for metaphorical motion is also considered.
Keywords: Chinese, entity-location duality, event, metaphorical motion, systematicity, complexity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Categories of metaphorical motion expressions and the corresponding mappings
- 2.1Metaphorical motion in metaphors of entity-location pairs
- Time
- a. time is a moving entity
- b. time is location
- Emotion
- a. emotions are moving entities
- b. emotional states are locations
- Mental activities
- a. an idea / a thought / mind / memory is a moving entity
- b. mental states are locations
- Sickness
- a. sickness is a moving entity
- b. sickness is a location
- Birth, death and life
- a. birth/death/life is a moving entity
- b. death/life is a location
- Time
- 2.2Metaphorical motion in orientational metaphors
- a. happy is up; sad is down
- b. more is up; less is down
- c. high status is up; low status is down
- d. conscious is up; unconscious is down
- 2.1Metaphorical motion in metaphors of entity-location pairs
- 3.Systematicity and complexity of metaphorical motion
- 3.1The issue of systematicity
- 3.2The issue of complexity
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (42)
Alverson, H. (1994). Semantics and experience: universal metaphor of time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Croft, W., J. Barðdal, W. Hollman, V. Sotirova, & C. Taoka. (2002). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive Construction Grammar (pp. 201–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gentner, D., M. Imai. & L. Boroditsky. (2002). As time goes by: evidence for two systems in processing space time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, (17), 537–565.
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation: University of California, Berkeley.
(1998). The Conduit Metaphor revisited: A reassessment of metaphors for communication. In J. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 205–218). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2003). Motion events in Basque narratives. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 89–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Accociates.
(2004). Linguistic typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive linguistics, 15(3), 317–349.
(2005). Leonard Talmy. A windowing to conceptual structure and language. Part 1: Lexicalisation and typology. Annual review of cognitive linguistics, 3(1), 325–347.
Johnson, C. (1999). Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of SEE. In M. Hiraga, C. Sinha, and S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, typological and psychological issues in cognitive linguistics (pp. 155–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74.
(1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied and its challenge to western thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mandal, K. (1968). A comparative study of the concepts of space and time in Indian Thought. Varanas: Chowhamaba Sanskirt Studies, Vol. LXV1.
Moore, K. (2000). Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof: Point of view, conceptual mapping, and linguistic practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Núñez, R. & E. Sweetser. (2006). With the future behind them: convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, (30), 401–450.
Oxford Concise Dictionary of English Etymology. (2000). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Özçalışkan, Ş. (2002). Metaphors we move by: A crosslinguistic-developmental analysis of metaphorical motion events in English and Turkish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
(2003a). Metaphor meets typology: Ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics, 16 (1), 207–246.
(2003b). Metaphorical motion in crosslinguistic perspective: A comparison of English and Turkish. Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (3), 189–228.
(2007). Metaphors we move by: Children’s developing understanding of metaphorical motion in typologically distinct languages. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (2), 147–168.
Panther, K. U. & G. Radden. (2011). Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In K. U. Panter & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in Grammar and the lexicon (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Radden, G. (2003). The metaphor time as space across languages. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 8(2/3), 226–239.
Shinohara, K. (2000). Constraints on motion verbs in the time is motion metaphor. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 250–259.
(2002). Correspondence between the spatial front/back axis and temporal concepts in Japanese. In Shirai et al. (Eds.), Studies in Language Sciences (pp. 281–298). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and semantic description: Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519.
(2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Traugott, E. (1978). On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in Language. In J. Greenberg et al. (Eds.), Universals of human language. Vol. 31, Word structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Yu, N. (1995). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10 (2), 59–92.
(1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Chen, Shujun
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
