Article published In: Transcategoriality: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Danh Thành Do-Hurinville and Huy Linh Dao
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:1] 2018
► pp. 155–187
The kaleidoscope of divine images
Conceptual metaphors concerning God in gospel songs
Published online: 30 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00017.hua
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00017.hua
Abstract
Compared to metaphors about God in the Bible, those in other Christian contexts seem to receive little academic attention. To bridge this gap, this study examines metaphors gathered from gospel songs on Billboard and iTunes to analyze the abstract concept of God from a cognitive linguistic viewpoint through extending the framework of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Our findings indicate that while diverse kinds of metaphors focus on the multi-dimensionality of God such as his characteristics (e.g., GOD IS A MAGICIAN and GOD IS A LOVER), outline (e.g., GOD IS A CONTAINER and GOD IS LIQUID), and supreme status (e.g., GOD IS HIGH), structural metaphors tend to represent the overwhelming majority and thus form the basis for the structural-metaphor-dominant phenomenon. In addition, the flawless figure of God is suggested to result from the PERFECTION image schema which is responsible for hidden aspects in related metaphorical structures. Furthermore, metaphors about divine images, having their mapping details enriched by biblical context, are suggested to possess recessive metaphor inheritance. Finally, the rhythm of ‘chain of metaphors’ is proposed to interpret how the spirit of the songs about the divine being are brought out. This study sheds light on our overall understanding of the concepts of God in Christian culture, and contributes to the development of interdisciplinary studies concerning metaphor, religion, cognition, and culture.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background information and literature review
- 2.1Metaphor and religion
- 2.2The development of gospel song in Western culture
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Sources of the data
- 3.2The definition of God
- 3.3The identification of metaphorical linguistic expressions in the data
- 3.4The classification of different types of metaphors
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1The structural-metaphor-dominant phenomenon
- 4.2The eternally perfect images of God
- 4.3Recessive metaphor inheritance
- 4.4The rhythm of the chain of metaphors
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (64)
About Billboard Magazine. (n.d.). In Billboard. Retrieved August 8, 2016, from [URL].
Barcelona, A. (2003). The metaphorical and metonymic understanding of the Trinitarian dogma. International Journal of English Studies, 3 (1), 1–27.
Besançon, S. A. (1996). Father-ruler: The meaning of the metaphor “Father” for God in the Bible. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 39 (3), 433–442.
Botica, A. (2014). “The all-knowing God.” Old Testament and Hellenistic Metaphors in the genre of New Testament Apocalyptic. Caesura – Journal of Philological and Humanistic Studies, 1 (2), 1–19.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chu, M. (1996). The power of metaphor: Veils within Judeo-Christianity and Islam. Retrieved from [URL].
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Cusic, D. (1990). The sound of light: A history of gospel music. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
(2002). The development of gospel music. In A. Moore (Ed.), Cambridge companion to blues and gospel music (pp. 44–60). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
DesCamp, M. T., & Sweetser, E. V. (2005). Metaphors for God: Why and how do our choices matter for humans? The application of contemporary cognitive linguistics research to the debate on God and metaphor. Pastoral Psychology, 53 (3), 207–238.
Eder, S. (2016). “Broken hearted” and “crushed in spirit”: Metaphors and emotions in Psalm 34, 19. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, 30 (1), 1–15.
Fedriani, C. (2016). Ontological and orientational metaphors in Latin. In W. M. Short (Ed.), Embodiment in Latin semantics (pp. 115–140). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
First Great Awakening. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved October 10, 2017, from [URL].
Gerhart, M., & Russell, A. M. (1984). Metaphoric process: The creation of scientific and religious understanding. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.
Gonzalez, A., & Makay, J. J. (1983). Rhetorical ascription and the gospel according to Dylan. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69 (1), 1–14.
Gospel music. (n.d.). In Wikipedia
. Retrieved March 16, 2017, from [URL].
Harrison, A. (2015, July 9). Speaking of sin: Conceptual metaphor and cultural divide. Dedicated Journal. Retrieved from [URL]
Hesbacher, P., Downing, R., & Berger, D. G. (1975). Sound recording popularity charts: A useful tool for music research. Popular Music and Society, 4 (1), 3–18.
Howe, B. (2006). Because you bear this name: Conceptual metaphor and the moral meaning of 1 Peter. Leiden, the Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.
iTunes. (n.d.). In Encyclopedia Britannica
. Retrieved August 8, 2016, from [URL].
Jackson, J. M. (1995). The changing nature of Gospel music: A southern case study. African American Review, 29 (2), 185–191.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Joyce, G. (1912). The blessed Trinity. In The Catholic encyclopedia. New York, NY: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved August 7, 2015, from New Advent: [URL].
Keach, B. (1972). Preaching from the types and metaphors of the Bible (12th ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications.
King, P. (2012). Metaphor and methodology for cross-cultural investigation of Hebrew emotions. Journal of Translation, 8 (1), 9–24.
Klop, M. -L. (2015). God the exclusively Christian father: An analysis of the response of Islamic teenagers to Christian metaphors applied to Allah (Master thesis). Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University.
Kotzé, Z. (2004). The conceptualisation of anger in the Hebrew Bible (Doctoral dissertation). Stellenbosch, South Africa: Stellenbosch University.
(2011). The Biblical story retold: A cognitive linguistic perspective. In M. Brdar, S. Th. Gries & M. Ž. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 325–354). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kuczok, M. (2010). Conceptual metaphors for the notion of Christian life in John Henry Newman’s Parochial and Plain Sermons
. Newman Studies Journal, 7 (2), 29–40.
Labahn, A. (2006). Fire from above: Metaphors and images of God’s actions in Lamentations 2:1–9. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 31 (2), 239–256.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Legg, A. (2010). A taxonomy of musical gesture in African American gospel music. Popular Music, 29 (1), 103–129.
Lin, T. Y. -Y., & Chiang, W. -y. (2016). Concrete images and abstract metaphorical extensions in the encounter between language and music: Hsu Chih-Mo’s poem “Serendipity.” Journal of Pragmatics, 961, 32–48.
McFague, S. (1982). Metaphorical theology: Models of God in religious language. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
Neville, R. C. (2001). Symbols of Jesus: A Christology of symbolic engagement. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Ou, H. -H. (2012). Reading Biblical metaphors from the perspective of cognitive semantics – based on the recovery version and its footnotes (Doctoral dissertation). Kaohsiung, Taiwan: National Sun Yat-Sen University.
Pihlaja, S. (2011). Cops, popes, and garbage collectors: Metaphor and antagonism in an Atheist/Christian YouTube video thread. Language and Internet, 81, 1–17.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1), 1–39
Richardson, P. (2012). A closer walk: A study of the interaction between metaphors related to movement and proximity and presuppositions about the reality of belief in Christian and Muslim testimonials. Metaphor and the Social World, 2 (2), 233–261.
Ricœur, P. (1977). The rule of metaphor: Multi-disciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language (R. Czernyi, Trans.). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1975)
Sharifian, F. (2003). On cultural conceptualisations. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3 (3), 187–207.
Sheed, F. J. (1993). Theology and sanity. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press. (Original work published 1946)
Slick, M. (2008). What is the trinity? In Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry (CARM). Retrieved from [URL].
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 1711, 63–105.
The history of gospel music. (n.d.). In Gospel Music Heritage Month Foundation (GMHMF). Retrieved August 14, 2016, from [URL].
Timeline. (n.d.). In University of South California Digital Library. Retrieved September 9, 2015, from [URL].
Trinity. (n.d.). In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from [URL].
Trinity. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from [URL].
Walker, S. (1998). Grounding biblical metaphor in reality: The philosophical basis of realist metaphorical language. Churchman, 112 (3), 214–224.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Richardson, Peter & Miori Nagashima
2022. Divine and human agency in figurative language from John’s Gospel and Jodo‑Shinshu Buddhism. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 9:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
