Cover not available

Introduction published In: Transcategoriality: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Danh Thành Do-Hurinville and Huy Linh Dao
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:1] 2018
► pp. 1–7

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Introduction

Transcategoriality: A crosslinguistic perspective

 | University of Rouen
 | Université de Franche-Comté
 | Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 30 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00010.int
Article outline
  • 1.General issues
  • 2.Case studies
  • Note
  • References
References (30)
References
Andersen, G. (2000). The role of the pragmatic marker like in utterance interpretation. In Gisle Andersen, Thorsten Fretheim (eds.), Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude. Pragmatics and Beyond, 791. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anward, J. (2000). A dynamic model of part-of-speech differentiation. In P. M. Vogel & B. Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, (pp. 3–45). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Badiou-Monferran, C., & Buchi, E. (2012). Plaidoyer pour la désolidarisation des notions de pragmaticalisation et de grammaticalisation. In Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française (CMLF 2012).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buchi, E. (2007). Approche diachronique de la (poly)pragmaticalisation du français déjà (Quand le grammème est-il devenu pragmatème, déjà?). In Trotter David (eds.), Actes du XXIVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes (Aberystwyth 2004), (pp. 251–264.), Tübingen, Niemeyer, vol. III1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charolles, M., & Lamiroy, B. (2005). Du lexique à la grammaire : seulement, simplement, uniquement. Cahiers de lexicologie 901, 93–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danon-Boileau, L., & Morel, M. -A. (1997). Question, point de vue, genre, style…: les noms prépositionnels en français contemporain. Faits de langues 91, 193–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dostie, G. (2004). Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs. Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique. Bruxelles, De Boeck: Duculot. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane, & Pusch, Claus D. (2007). Présentation: les marqueurs discursifs. In Les marqueurs discursifs, G. Dostie & C. Pusch (eds.), Langue française 1541, 3–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erman, B., & Kotsinas, U. -B. (1993). Pragmaticalization: the case of ba’ and you know. Studier i modern språkvetenskap 101, 76–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flament-Boistrancourt, D. (2002). Et au niveau tarifs, ça donne quoi ? L’éclairage du corpus LANCOM sur le mot niveau . Tableaux vivants: opstellen over taal-en-onderwijs, aangeboden aan Mark Debrock / Onder red. van Jean Binon e.a. – Leuven: Universitaire pers, 117–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischman, S., & Yaguello, M. (2004). Discourse markers across languages? Evidence from English and French. In C. L. Moder & A. Martinovic-Zic (eds), Discourse Across Languages and Cultures (pp. 129–147). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. (2013). On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else ? Linguistics 51(6), 1205–1247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd et al. 2013. An Outline of Discourse Grammar. In Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany, Functional Approaches to Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter. 155-206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isambert, P. (2012). Exemplification, approximation, modalisation, rupture narrative : hypothèses sur la grammaticalisation de genre . Verbum XXXIV, 1, 3–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther et al. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 852–897.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1960). Éléments de linguistique générale. Paris. Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meehan, T. (1991). It’s Like, ‘What’s happening in the Evolution of Like ?: A Theory of Grammaticalization. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol 161, 37–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, M. -B. (2008). Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. A Study with Special Reference to the French Phasal Adverbs. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3/4), 235–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noailly, M. (2006). Quoi de neuf côté préposition ? Modèles linguistiques, 27–1, vol. 531, 75–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982). Côté, question et quelques autres, Linguisticae Investigationes, VI/21, 333–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Querler, N. (2001). La grammaticalisation de côté introducteur de topicalisation. Travaux linguistiques du Cerlico, 14/21, la grammaticalisation, 155–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robert, S. (2003a). Introduction : de la grammaticalisation à la transcatégorialit. In Robert (eds), Perspectives synchroniques sur la grammaticalisation, Afrique et Langage 51 (pp. 9–18). Louvain-Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003b). Polygrammaticalisation, grammaire fractale et propriétés d’échelle. In Robert (eds), Perspectives synchroniques sur la grammaticalisation, Afrique et Langage 51 (pp. 85–120). Louvain-Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosier, L. (2002). Genre : le nuancier de sa grammaticalisation. Travaux de linguistique 441, 79–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, M. E. A. (2002). Like: The Discourse Particle and Semantics. Journal of Semantics 191, 11, 35–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1959). Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris, Klincksieck, (1988 2e eds, 5e tirage).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, G., & B. Birner. (1996). On the Discourse Function of Rightward Movement in English. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 463–479). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yaguello, M. (1998). Genre, un marqueur d’un genre nouveau. In Petits faits de langue (pp. 18–24). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Díaz Romero, Camilo Enrique
2023. Observaciones tipológicas sobre la persona gramatical y clases de palabra en documentos coloniales de Colombia, Venezuela y Ecuador. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 23 ► pp. e023015 ff. DOI logo
Díaz Romero, Camilo Enrique
2025. Consideraciones areales sobre la persona gramatical en lenguas de Venezuela y Ecuador, siglos XX-XXI. Lenguaje 53:1 ► pp. e20114491 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue