Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 4:2 (2017) ► pp.355–376

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Frames of reference and the encoding of spatial location in Mandarin Chinese

 | Henan University (China)
Published online: 16 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00009.zha
Abstract
This article attempts to account for how the static spatial relations of location between objects are encoded in Mandarin Chinese with Levinson’s notions of frames of reference and Talmy’s concept of Figure-Ground relations as theoretical guidance. Space is relational in nature, and spatial relations are embodied concepts that are at the heart of our conceptual system. That’s why they cannot be seen in the way physical objects are observed. Accordingly, I am inclined to propose that spatial relations are not natural entities in the physical world, but abstract ones that are construed and conceptualized subjectively by human beings. In accordance with the relational nature of space, Mandarin Chinese speakers usually encode the abstract spatial relation X Spatially Relates To Y into a linguistic representation as X V Y (P) where P is optional, when a pure static spatial relation of location between objects is construed, or into a linguistic representation as X VP zài Y P where VP stands for verbs of posture, when the object being located is conceived as being spatially related in a certain manner with respect to the reference object. Usually, such linguistic representations as X V Y (P) and X VP zài Y P are usually realized in Mandarin Chinese as two types of locative constructions: spatial relation constructions of containment/enclosure and spatial relation constructions of proximity/adjacency. What’s more, though locative constructions are related in some way to existential constructions in Mandarin Chinese, they are actually distinct from each other in three ways from a cognitive linguistics perspective: (i) they encode different spatial relations, (ii) they reveal different Figure-Ground relations, and (iii) there is a difference in definiteness of the two nominals involved.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Frames of reference
  • 3.Figure-ground relations
  • 4.Localizers as spatial postpositions
  • 5.Encoding of spatial location in Mandarin Chinese
    • 5.1Spatial relations and spatial relation constructions
    • 5.2Encoding of spatial location in Mandarin Chinese
      • 5.2.1 X V Y (P) encoding a contained-container or an enclosed-enclosure relation
      • 5.2.2 X V Y P encoding a proximity or adjacency relation
      • 5.2.3 X VP zài Y P encoding a spatial relation with some manner of OL involved
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (54)
References
Carlson, L. A. (2000). Object use and object location: The effect of function on spatial relations. In E. van der Zee & U. Nikanne (Eds.). Cognitive interfaces: Constraints on linking cognitive information (pp.94–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chappell, H. & Peyraube, A. (2008). Chinese localizers: Diachrony and some typological considerations. In D. Xu (Ed.). Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp.15–37). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, W. (1978). Wénfǎ jiǎnlùn [A brief introduction to grammar]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheung, C. C. -H. (2016a). Chinese: Parts of speech. In S. -W. Chan, J. Minett & F. L. -W. Yee (Eds.). The Routledge encyclopedia of the Chinese language (pp. 242–294). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). Parts of speech in Mandarin: The state of the art. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1987). Locationals: Existential, locative, and possessive constructions. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.). Universals of human language (pp. 85–126). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coventry, K. R. & Garrod, S. C. 2004. Saying, seeing, and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernst, T. 1988. Chinese postpositions? – again. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 16(2), 219–245.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, J. (2004). Xiàndài hànyǔ fāngwèi chéngfèn de fènhuà hé yǔfǎhuà [Differentiation and grammaticalization of locative terms in modern Chinese]. Shìjiè Hànyǔ Jiāoxué [Chinese Teaching in the World], (21), 5–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Q. (2014). Hànyǔ hòuzhìcí yánjiū zōngshù [A survey of studies on Chinese postpositions]. Hànyǔ Xuéxí [Chinese Language Learning], (21), 80–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemmens, M. (2016). Cognitive semantics. In N. Riemer (Ed.). The Routledge handbook of semantics (pp. 90–105). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Cross-linguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. Garrett (Eds.). Language and space (pp.109–169). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. & Wilkins, D. P. (2006). The background to the study of the language of space. In S. C. Levinson & D. P. Wilkins (Eds.). Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity (pp.1–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Y. (2009). Hànyǔ fāngwèicí de cíxìng jíqí lǐlùn yìyì (Chinese localizers: Grammatical nature and theoretical significance). Zhōngguó Yǔwén [Studies of the Chinese Language], 21, 99–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, D. (2002). Hànyǔ-zhōng de kuàngshì jiècí (Circumpositions in Chinese). Dāngdài Yǔyánxué [Contemporary Linguistics], 4(4), 241–253.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Syntax of space across Chinese dialects: Conspiring and competing principles and factors. In D. Xu (Ed.). Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp.39–67). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, F. -H. (1998). A clitic analysis of locative particles. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 26(1), 48–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Pan, W. & Gu, W. (2001). Shíyòng hànyǔ yǔfǎ [A practical modern Chinese grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loar, J. K. (2011). Chinese syntactic grammar: Functional and conceptual principles. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1967). A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language, 31, 390–396.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1968). Existence, location, possession and transitivity. In B. van Rootselaar & T. F. Staal (Eds.). Logic, methodology, and philosophy of science, III1 (pp.495–509). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mark, D. M. & Frank, A. U. (1989). Concepts of space and spatial language. Ninth international symposium on computer-assisted cartography (Auto-Carto 9) (pp. 538–556). Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McHenry, R. (Ed.). (1993). The new encyclopedia Britannica (Vol. 111). Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, W. (2015). New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, C. & Ma, J. S. (2006). Modern Mandarin Chinese grammar: A practical guide. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shao, J. (2007). Xiàndài hànyǔ tōnglùn [Modern Chinese: A general survey], (2nd ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun, C. (2008). Two conditions and grammaticalization of the Chinese locative. In D. Xu (Ed.). Space in languages of China: cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp. 199–227). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1972). Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. Doctoral Dissertation. Linguistics Department, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1975). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In C. Cogen, H. Thompson, G. Thurgood, K. Whistler & J. Wright (Eds.). Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp.419–430). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, Inc. Also in J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.). (1978). Universals of human language, Volume 4: Syntax (pp.625–649). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983). How language structures space. In H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.). Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp.225–282). New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. I1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, F. and Schmid, H. (2006). An introduction to cognitive linguistics (2nd ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wen, L. (1984). Chùsuǒ, shíjiān hé fāngwèi [Location, time and direction/position]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, F. (2008). Origin and evolution of the locative term hòu ‘BACK’ in Chinese. In D. Xu (Ed.). Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp. 229–247). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xing, F. (1997). Hànyǔ yǔfǎxué [Grammatics of Chinese]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Modern Chinese grammar: A clause-pivot approach. Translated by Y. Wang & F. Dong. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, D. (2008). Introduction: How Chinese structures space. In D. Xu (Ed.). Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp. 1–14). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, P. C. & D. Rimmington. (2016). Chinese: A comprehensive grammar. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). Kōngjiān guānxì gòushì de rènzhī yánjiū [Cognitive studies on spatial relation constructions]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, D. (1982). Yǔfǎ jiǎngyì [Lecture notes on grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2007). Spatial semantics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.318–350). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue