Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 4:2 (2017) ► pp.330–354

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

English transitive particle verbs

Particle placement and idiomaticity

 | Lafayette College (USA)
Published online: 16 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00008.luo
Abstract
Adopting the Cognitive Linguistic (CL) framework, this study focuses on the particle placement phenomenon of English transitive particle verbs and its relationship with idiomaticity. Construal is argued to play a key role in determining which order a transitive particle verb should take. When a caused motion event or state change event is construed sequentially, the discontinuous order is taken to emphasize the final resultant state of the object. When the holistic construal is taken to view the same situation, the continuous order is adopted to profile the object or the interaction between the subject and the object. The holistic construal requires two conditions. First, the particle has a dynamic sense. It can designate both the process and the endpoint of motion. Second, the final state denoted by the particle is directly caused by the action denoted by the verb. In contrast, the sequential construal is allowed as long as a causal link can be established between the two participants under discussion or between the verb and the state change of one participant. In addition, the present study argues that the particle placement of idiomatic particle verbs depends on the processes in which the particle verb has developed its idiomaticity. If the idiomatic meaning develops from the inference associated with the sequential construal, the discontinuous order is preferred. On the other hand, if the idiomatic meaning is based on the holistic construal, the continuous order is then preferred. Moreover, item-by-item analyses of particle verbs that only allow one order listed in the Collins COBUILD Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs provide corpus-based support to the CL view of the relationship between construal, particle placement, and idiomaticity proposed in this study.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Factors identified by functionalists
    • 2.2 Gries’ (1999) Study
    • 2.3 Dirven’s (2001) Study
  • 3.Particle placement and construal
    • 3.1Sequential construal and holistic construal
    • 3.2Constraints on the holistic construal
  • 4.Idiomaticity and particle placement
  • 5.Corpus-based evidence
    • 5.1Particle verbs that require the discontinuous order
    • 5.2Particle verbs that require the continuous order
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (29)
References
Bolinger, D. (1971). The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darwin, C. M., & Gray, L. S. (1999). Going after the particle verbs: An alternative approach to classification. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 65–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Den Dikken, M. (1995). Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R. (2001). English particle verbs: Theory and didactic application. In M. Pütz & S. Niemeier (Eds.). Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1976). The verb-particle combination in English. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2007). Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 339–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1990). Psycholinguistic studies on the conceptual basis of idiomaticity. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(4), 417–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2016). Tuning in to the verb-particle construction in English. In L. Nash & P. Samvelian (Eds.), Approaches to complex predicates (pp. 110–141). Boston: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (1999). Particle movement: A cognitive and functional approach Cognitive Linguistics, 10 (2), 105–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). The influence of processing on syntactic variation: particle placement in English. In N. Dehe, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Verb particle explorations (pp. 269–288). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax. In N. Dehe, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Verb particle explorations (pp. 67–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Concept, image and symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, P. S. (1997). Figuring out figure out: Metaphor and the semantics of the English verb-particle construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (4), 327–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olsen, S. (1996). Partikelverben im Deautsch-Englischen Vergleich. In E. Lang & G. Zifonun (Eds.). Deutsch-typologisch (pp. 261–288). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J., Moon, R., et al. (1989). Collins COBUID dictionary of particle verbs. London: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svenonius, P. (1996). The optionality of particle shift. Working papers in Scandinavian syntax, 571, 47–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, volumes II. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thim, S. (2012). Phrasal verbs: the English verb-particle construction and its history. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dongen, V. A. Sr. (1919). He puts on his hat and he puts his hat on. Neophililogus, 41, 322–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Luo, Han
2019. Particle Placement. In Particle Verbs in English, ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Luo, Han
2019. Conclusion and Outlook. In Particle Verbs in English, ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Luo, Han
2019. Theoretical Framework. In Particle Verbs in English, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Berg, Thomas
2018. Towards an explanation of the syntax of West Germanic particle verbs: A cognitive-pragmatic view. Cognitive Linguistics 29:4 ► pp. 703 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue