Cover not available

In:Emancipatory Pragmatics: Innovative approaches to pragmatics incorporating the concept of “ba”
Edited by Yoko Fujii, William F. Hanks, Sachiko Ide, Scott Saft and Kishiko Ueno
[Culture and Language Use 24] 2025
► pp. 170195

References (61)
References
Auer, J. C. P., Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Müller, F. (1999). Language in time: The rhythm and tempo of spoken interaction. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Besnier, N. (1994). Involvement in linguistic practice: An ethnographic appraisal. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 279–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brody, M. J. (2019). Heightened discourse and dialogic syntax in Tojol-ab’al conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 29(2), 221–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, P. M., Thompson, A. S., Suzuki, R., & Tao, H. (1996). The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 355–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayton, M., Sager, R., & Udo, W. (2005). In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and its significance for ethnomusicology. European Seminar in Ethnomusicology, 11, 3–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, J. (2007). Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 29–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condon, S. W., & Sander, S. L. (1974). Synchrony demonstrated between movements of the neonate and adult speech. Child Development, 45(2), 456–462. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. J. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3), 359–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. J. & Glora, R. (2014). From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3), 351–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fujii, Y. (2012). Differences of situating self in the place/ba of interaction between the Japanese and American English speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 636–662. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 151–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1973). The silent language. Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, F. W. (2016). Basho: A theory of communicative interaction. Paper presented at The Third International Workshop on Linguistics of BA. Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
(2019). Utterance context through the lens of Basho. Paper presented at the Tokyo Workshop on the Linguistics of Ba. Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hanks, F. W., Ide, S., & Katagiri, Y. (2009). Introduction: Towards an emancipatory pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2005). The importance of “place” in Japanese politeness: Implications for cross-cultural and intercultural analyses. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(1), 41–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, R. (1996). Cognition, empathy, and interaction: Floor management of English and Japanese conversation. Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hohenberger, A. (2002). Functional categories in language acquisition: Self-organization of a dynamical system. DeGruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holstein, A. J., & Gubrium, F. J. (1995). The active interview. Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Honda, A. (2010). Storytelling in a Japanese television talk show. In P. Szatrowski (Ed.), Storytelling across Japanese conversational genres (pp. 183–210). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ide, R. (2020). Katari ni okeru koeno kyoomei [The resonance of voice in narrative]. In S. Ide & Y. Fujii (Eds.), Ba to kotoba no shosoo [Ba and language use] (pp. 105–130). Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ide, S. (2006). Wakimae no goyooron [Pragmatics of wakimae]. Taishuukan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ide, S., & Ueno, K. (2011). Honorifics and address terms. In G. Anderson & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Pragmatics of society (pp. 439–470). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ikegami, Y. (1991). Do-language and become-language: Two contrasting types of linguistic representation. In Y. Ikegami (Ed.), The Empire of signs: Semiotic essays on Japanese culture (pp. 285–326). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S. (2011). The multimodal mechanics of collaborative unit construction in Japanese conversation. In J. Streek, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction (pp. 106–120). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S., & Ide, S. (2007). Nodding, aizuchi, and final particles in Japanese conversation: How conversation reflects the ideology of communication and social relationships. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1242–1254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kogure, M. (2007). Nodding and smiling in silence during the loop sequence of backchannels in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1275–1289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experiences. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). University of Washington Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, K. S. (1989). Japanese conversation: Self-contextualization through structure and interactional management. Ablex. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Kaiwa bunseki [Conversation analysis]. Kurosio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyake, K. (2012). Ningengaku toshiteno Nihongo kenkyuu [Japanese studies as Human studies]. In S. T. Kenkyuukai (Eds.), Suzuki Takao no sekai: Kotoba, bunka, shizen [The world of Takao Suzuki: Language, culture, and nature] (pp. 147–162). Fujiboo International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mizutani, N. (1993). Kyoowa kara taiwa e [From co-constructed talk to dialogic talk]. Nihongogaku, 12(4), 4–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakane, C. (1986). Criteria of group formation. In S. T. Lebra & W. P. Lebra, (Eds.), Japanese culture and behavior: Selected readings (pp. 171–187). University of Hawaii Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of Ba: Building a foundation of knowledge of knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohtsuka, M. (2011). On ba theory. Paper presented at the 3rd Tokyo International Pragmatics Workshop, Kyoritsu Women’s University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ostrow, J. M. (1996). Spontaneous involvement and social life. Sociological Perspectives, 39(3), 341–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saft, S. (2007). Exploring aizuchi as a resource in Japanese social interaction: The case of a political discussion program. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), 1290–1312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Rethinking Western individualism from the perspective of social interaction and from the concept of ba. Journal of Pragmatics, 69, 108–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 71–83). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sherzer, J. (1987). A discourse-centered approach to language and culture. American Anthropologist, 89(2), 295–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shimizu, H. (1995). “Ba-principle”: New logic for the real-time emergence of information. Holonics, 5(1), 67–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Ba no shisoo [The philosophy of ba]. University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Inochi no jiko-soshiki [The self-organization of <inochi>]. University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szatrowski, P. (2010). Introduction: Storytelling across Japanese conversational genre. In P. Szatrowski (Ed.), Storytelling across Japanese conversational genres (pp. 3–20). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takeda, L. (2016). Collaboration created by overlaps: A study of Japanese interactions of different genres and levels of intimacy. The Japanese Journal of Language in Society, 19(1), 87–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (2005[1984]). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007[1989]). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imaginary in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tatara, N. (2015). Supootsu jikkyou tyuukei no komyunikeisyon sutairu: Jikkyou tyuukei no sougokoui ni arawareru syakaibunkateki katikan to sono saiseisan [Communication styles in live sports commentary in Japanese and English]. The Journal of J. F. Oberlin University. Studies in Language and Culture, 6, 65–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Futtobooru jikkyou tyuukei no nichieigo hikaku: Ba no riron no kanten kara [Japanese-English comparison of football commentary: From the perspective of the ba theory]. In S. Ide & Y. Fujii (Eds.), Ba to kotoba no shosoo [Ba and language use] (pp. 131–154), Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ueno, K. (2016). Yuugooteki danwa no ba no riron niyoru kaishaku [An interpretation of induced-fit utterances through ba theory]. Taiguu Comyunikeeshon Kenkyuu, 13, 18–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wadel, A. (2011). Self-organization in phonology. In M. V. Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, B. Hume, & K. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (Vol.1, pp. 130–146). Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, J. M., & Clark, S. J. (2019). Co-present conversation as “socialized trance”: Talk, involvement obligations, and smart-phone disruption. Symbolic Interaction, 42(1), 6–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamada, H. (2002). Different games, different rules: Why Americans and Japanese misunderstand each other. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yngve, V. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In 6th Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 567–578). CLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue