In:Crises We Live By: A transdisciplinary study of crisis and its metaphors in their cultural context
Edited by Irene Leonardis
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 20] 2026
► pp. 1–18
Crisis in ancient and contemporary uses
A concept at the crossroads of metaphor and metonymy?
Published online: 5 February 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.20.intro
https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.20.intro
Abstract
By echoing and altering the title of Lakoff and Johnson’s seminal book (1980), Crises we live by stresses the role of embodied crisis experience(s). This
introduction deepens our understanding of how the concept of crisis is conceptualised through a cluster of cognitive metaphors
(activated or emphasised in line with recent or historical memories, political intentions, etc.), and additionally depends on
a continuous re-elaboration over time and different cultural contexts. Being entirely embedded in Western tradition (and
stemming from an Ancient Greek word), “crisis” has been permeated by the experiences and accounts of previous critical events
(such as natural disasters, pandemics, and wars), which are part of collective memory and thus, through a metonymic process,
stand for crisis.
Keywords: crisis, Koselleck, metaphor, metonymy, cultural memory
Article outline
- 1.Background to this volume
- 2.Explaining the title
- 3.Crises at the crossroads of metaphor and metonymy
- 3.1So what exactly is a crisis?
- 3.2A metonymic base for crises metaphors
- 3.3History of crises and their contribution to the idea of crisis
- 4.An overview of the volume
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (28)
Assmann, J. (2008). Communicative
and Cultural Memory. In A. Erll, & A. Nünning (Eds.), Cultural
Memory
Studies (pp. 109–119). Mouton de Gruyter.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). Forms
of Time and Chronotope in the Novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The
Dialogic Imagination: Four
Essays (pp. 84–258). University of Texas Pr.
Barcelona, A. (Ed.) (2003). Introduction.
The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor
and Metonymy at the
Crossroads (pp. 1–28). Mouton de Gruyter.
Breazeale, D. (1979) (Ed.). Selections
from Nietzsche’s Notebooks of the Early 1870’s. Humanities Pr.
Casson, L. (1973). Ships
and Seamanship in the Ancient World (third
reprint). Princeton University Pr.
Charteris-Black, J. (2021). Metaphors
of Coronavirus: Invisible Enemy or Zombie Apocalypse?. Springer Nature.
Erll, A., & Rigney, A. (Eds) (2009). Mediation,
Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Mouton de Gruyter.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The
Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.
Goossens, L. (1995). Metaphtonymy:
The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Figurative Expressions for Linguistic
Action. In L. Goossens, P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A. Simon-Vandenbergen, & J. Vanparys (Eds.), By
Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in Cognitive
Perspective (pp. 159–174). John Benjamins.
Grady, J. (1999). A
Typology of Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor Correlation vs.
Resemblance. In. R. Gibbs, & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor
in Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 79–100). John Benjamins.
Ho, J., & Chiang, E. (2022). ‘Those
Lunatic Zombies’: The Discursive Framing of Wuhan Lockdown Escapees in Digital
Space. In A. Musolff, R. Breeze, K. Kondo, & S. Vilar-Lluch (Eds.), Pandemic
and Crisis Discourse: Communicating COVID-19 and Public Health
Strategy (pp. 339–354). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Koselleck, R. (1982). Krise. In O. Brunner, W. Conze, & R. Koselleck (Eds.), Geschichtliche
Grundbegriffe,
III, (pp. 617–650). Klett-Cotta.
Kövecses, Z. (2009). Metaphor,
Culture and Discourse: The Pressure of Coherence. In A. Musolff, & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor
and
Discourse (pp. 11–24). Palgrave Macmillan.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More
Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press.
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors
Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. The University of Chicago Pr.
Parui, A., & Simi Raj, M. (2021). The
COVID-19 Crisis Chronotope: The Pandemic as Matter, Metaphor and Memory. Memory
Studies, 14(6), 1431–1444.
Radden, G. (2003). How
Metonymic Are Metaphors? In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor
and Metonymy in Comparison and
Contrast (pp. 407–434). Mouton de Gruyter.
Reisigl &
Wodak (2008). The Discourse-Historical Approach
(DHA). In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods
of Critical Discourse Analysis Second
Edition (pp. 87–121). SAGE Publications.
Saddington, D. (2009). Problems
in the Nomenclature of the Personnel and the Question of Marines in the Roman
Fleets. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical
Studies, 52, 123–132.
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2003). Metaphor,
Metonymy, and Binding. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor
and Metonymy at the
Crossroads (pp. 133–145). Mouton de Gruyter.
Wildgen, W. (1994). Process,
Image, and Meaning. John Benjamins.
