In:Crises We Live By: A transdisciplinary study of crisis and its metaphors in their cultural context
Edited by Irene Leonardis
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 20] 2026
► pp. 20–39
Metaphors for crisis in Polybius’ cycle of constitutions and mixed constitution
Published online: 5 February 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.20.01zan
https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.20.01zan
Abstract
In this paper, I discuss the conceptual metaphors used by Polybius to articulate notions of
political crisis in Book 6 of his Histories. I begin by outlining Polybius’ theory of the cycle of
constitutions and the mixed constitution. I then proceed to Polybius’ metaphors for constitutional crisis; these
depend on domains involving structures, locations, seafaring, and biology. I further consider personification and the
metaphor of balance that characterizes the mixed constitution. However, Polybius never uses the term ‘crisis’
(krisis) in discussing either the movement of a state through the cycle of constitutions or the
collapse of the mixed constitution. Ancient historical texts, which precede the canonization our terminology, can
therefore augment Koselleck’s thesis concerning the historicity and development of our vocabulary for crisis.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Constitutions as physical structures
- 3.Constitutional change as movement
- 4.The ship metaphor
- 5.The biological metaphor
- 6.Integration of metaphors
- 7.The metaphors of the mixed constitution
- 8.Conclusion
Notes References
References (24)
Atkins, J. (2013). Cicero
on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Law. Cambridge University Pr.
Christensen, J. (2022). Shepherds,
Fathers, and Ships: Ancient Greek Leadership Metaphors and Some
Consequences. Science et
Esprit, 74, 165–179.
Erskine, A. (2013). How
to Rule the World: Polybius Book 6
Reconsidered. In B. Gibson, & T. Harrison (Eds.), Polybius
and His World. Essays in Memory of F. W.
Walbank (pp. 231–245). Oxford University Pr.
Hahm, D. E. (1995). Polybius’
Applied Political Theory. In A. Laks, & M. Schofield (Eds.), Justice
and
Generosity (pp. 7–47). Cambridge University Pr.
Koselleck, R. (1982). Krise. In O. Brunner, R. Conze, & R. Koselleck (Eds.), Geschichtliche
Grundbegriffe. Volume 3 (617–650). Klett-Cotta Verlag.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The
Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and Thought. Second
Edition (pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Pr.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy
in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.
Momigliano, A. (1966). Time
in Ancient Historiography. History and Theory, 6, Beiheft 6: History and the
Concept of Time, 1–23.
Nelsestuen, G. A. (2017). Custom,
Fear and Self-Interest in the Political Thought of Polybius. History of
Political
Thought, 38, 213–238.
Ryffel, H. (1949). ΜΕΤΑΒΟΛΗ
ΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΩΝ [Metabolē politeiōn]. Der Wandel der Staatsverfassungen. Verlag Paul Haupt.
Seager, R. (2013). Polybius’
Distortions of the Roman ‘Constitution’. In B. Gibson & T. Harrison (Eds.), Polybius
and His World. Essays in Memory of F. W.
Walbank (pp. 247–254). Oxford University Pr.
Von Fritz, K. (1954). The
Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity: A Critical Analysis of Polybius’ Political
Ideas. Columbia University Pr.
