Cover not available

In:Proverbs within Cognitive Linguistics: State of the art
Edited by Sadia Belkhir
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 16] 2024
► pp. 328–348

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 12
“We are in the same storm, not in the same boat”

Proverbial wisdom in environmental debates

 | University of Louvain, Belgium
Published online: 30 May 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.16.12aug
Abstract
The chapter proposes to investigate the implications of the proverbial phrase to be in the same boat in international debates about climate change. The study exposes the endorsed or disputed uses of the proverb. I analyse its exploitation by different discourse producers who convey different opinions. The data are extracted from various texts and speeches produced (or translated) in English. This research illustrates how the proverb can be exploited to fit different cultural traditions and different environmental concerns. The aim of the chapter is to identify the different arguments promoted by the use of the proverb. It also highlights the aspects of the proverb that may not correspond to the reality of climate change. This gives rise to argumentative exploitations using related metaphorical expressions. With reliance on cognitive metaphor theories (Lakoff 1993, 2004, 2010), and on metaphor scenarios in particular (Musolff 2004, 2016, 2019a), the occurrences discussed below demonstrate how the metaphorical image of the earth is a container has been challenged through the depiction of the earth is a boat. Indeed, the source concept boat comprises particular characteristics that can cause division among discourse producers to the extent that climate change debates may revolve around the use and misuse of the proverb. The chapter demonstrates that the proverbial phrase to be in the same boat involves precarious implications in environmental discourse.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Climate change, politics, and metaphors
    • 2.1Climate change metaphors
    • 2.2Proverbs and metaphors in political debates
    • 2.3The journey, transport, and boat metaphors
  • 3.Relevant approaches and selection of data
  • 4.We are in the same boat: Same boat, different arguments
  • 5.Sink or swim: Same storm, different boats
  • 6.Discussion and concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • Online resources and data availability statement
References (59)
References
Asplund, T. (2011). Metaphors in climate discourse: An analysis of Swedish farm magazines. Journal of Science Communication, 10(4): 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atanasova, D., & Koteyko, N. (2017). Metaphors in online editorials and op-eds about climate change, 2006–2013: A study of Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In K. Fløttum (Ed.). The role of language in the climate debate (pp. 71–89). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Augé, A. (2021). From scientific arguments to scepticism: Humans’ place in the GREENHOUSE. Public Understanding of Science, 31(2), 179–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). Metaphor and argumentation in climate crisis discourse. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (2004). Considering counter narratives. In M. Bamberg, & M. Andrews (Eds.). Considering counter-narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense (pp. 351–373). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belkhir, S. (2014). Cultural influence on the use of dog concepts in English and Kabyle proverbs. In A. Musolff, F. MacArthur, & G. Pagani (Eds.). Metaphor and intercultural communication (pp. 131–147). London: Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyd, R. (1993). Metaphor and theory change: What is ‘metaphor’ a metaphor for? In A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor and thought. Second Edition. (pp. 481–532). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Metaphors of Brexit: No cherries on the cake? London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deese, R.-S. (2009). The artefact of nature: Spaceship Earth and the dawn of global environmentalism. Endeavour. 33(2): 70–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2017). Metaphors in texts about climate change. Ibérica, 34, 45–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dent, S. (2018). Brewer’s dictionary of phrase and fable. Twentieth edition. London: Chambers Harrap.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flusberg, S.-J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P.-H. (2017). Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication 11(6), 769–783. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanne, M. (2014). An introduction to the “warring with word” project. In M. Hanne, W.-D. Crano, & J.-S. Mio (Eds.). Warring with words: Narrative and metaphor in politics (pp. 1–57). New York & London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, A.-H. (2010). “Audacious, Brilliant! What a strike!”: Live text commentaries on the internet as real-time narratives. In C. R. Hoffmann (Ed.). Narrative revisited: Telling a story in the age of new media (pp. 57–79). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff A. (2014). Sketch Engine, URL: sketchengine.euGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (2006). Narrative pre-construction. Narrative Inquiry 16(1), 37–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. Vermont: White River Junction, Vt.: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. (2007). The revenge of Gaia: Why the earth is fighting back – and how we can still save humanity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ly, A. (2013). Images and roles of the European Union in the climate change debate: A cognitive approach to metaphors in the European parliament’. In K. Fløttum (Ed.). Speaking of Europe: Approaches to complexity in European political discourse (pp. 151–71). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCreadie, K. (2008). Sun Tzu’s the art of war: A 52 brilliant ideas interpretation. Oxford: Infinite Ideas Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mieder, W. (1997). The politics of proverbs: From traditional wisdom to proverbial stereotypes. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muir, S.-A. (1994). The web and the spaceship: Metaphors of the environment. Et cetera: A Review of General Semantics, 51(2), 145–152.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019a). How (not?) to quote a proverb: The role of figurative quotations and allusions in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 135–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019b). Factual narrative and truth in political discourse. In M. Fludernik, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.). Narrative factuality (pp. 351–67). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nay, C. G., & Brunson, M. W. (2013). A war of words: Do conflict metaphors affect beliefs about managing unwanted plants? Societies, 3, 158–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerlich, B. (2010). Climate Gate: Paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environmental Values, 14 (9), 419–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerlich, B., & Hellsten, I. (2014). The greenhouse metaphor and the footprint metaphor: Climate change risk assessment and risk management seen through the lens of two prominent metaphors. Technikfolgenabschätzung: Theorie und Praxis, 23(2), 27–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N. (2010). Carbon gold rush and carbon cowboys: A new chapter in green mythology? Environmental Communication, 4(1), 37–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robertson, T. (2012). The Malthusian moment : Global population growth and the birth of American environmentalism. Rutgers: Rutgers University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1996). War and peace in the global greenhouse: Metaphors we die by. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11(3), 175–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D., & Collins, L. (2014). From environmental to climate justice: Climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. WIREs Clim Change, 5, 359–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, C., & Nerlich, B. (2015). Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: A study of international policies, 1992–2012. Ecological Economics, 109, 34–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silaški, N., & Durovic, T. (2019). The journey metaphor in Brexit-related political cartoons. Discourse, Context and Media, 31, 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G.-J., Dorst, A.-G., Berenike Herrmann, J., Kaal, A.-A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun Tzu (5th century B.C.). The art of war. Trans. Butler Bowdon, T. (2010). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tognini Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams A. (2015). Metaphor as tools for enrolment: A case study exploration of the policy press release genre in regards to the Alberta Super Net. In J. B. Hermann, & T.-B. Sardinha (Eds.). Metaphor in specialist discourse (pp. 271–296). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Online resources and data availability statement
Data are available at
Conference of the Parties: [URL]; [URL]; [URL]
COP26 Coalition: [URL]
Extinction Rebellion: [URL]
Friends of the Earth: [URL]
Greenpeace: [URL]
Nexis (n.d.): [URL]
United Nations: [URL]
United Nations Environment Programme: [URL]
World Health Organisation: [URL]
World Wild Fund: [URL]
Wild Life Conservation Society: [URL]
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue