In:Ibero-Asian Creoles: Comparative Perspectives
Edited by Hugo C. Cardoso, Alan N. Baxter and Mário Pinharanda-Nunes
[Creole Language Library 46] 2012
► pp. 81–124
Luso-Asian comparatives in comparison
Published online: 15 November 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.46.04car
https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.46.04car
In this article I compare and contrast the comparative constructions in the Luso-Asian Creoles, establishing their similarities and dissimilarities with Portuguese as well as with all the most relevant adstrate languages. Through a detailed look at a particular construction, this study aims to uncover the various creoles’ degree of reliance on either lexifier or adstrate models and unearth potential links between them. The results of this study are then articulated with a number of comments previously made about the Luso-Asian creoles in particular (such as their interrelatedness, and the perceived impact of socio-historical differences on linguistic structure) and language contact in general (such as the role of congruence in the selection of linguistic features).
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Kabir, Ananya Jahanara & Esha Sil
Silva, Carlos & Steven Moran
Tobar Delgado, Eduardo
Cardoso, Hugo C.
Cardoso, Hugo C.
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
Krajinović, Ana
2017. Influence of Malayalam on temporal clauses in Malabar Indo-Portuguese. Language Ecology 1:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Krajinović, Ana
Sippola, Eeva
2017. Similarities and differences among Iberian creoles. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 241 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
