Cover not available

Article published In: Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 8:1 (2017) ► pp.95–126

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Expressing conditionality in Mandarin

A corpus-based study of rúguǒ and zhǐyào

 | Zhejiang University, China
 | Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Published online: 21 September 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.8.1.06che
Abstract
After a broad overview of Mandarin Chinese conditionality marking, this paper presents a corpus-based analysis of two conditional connectives, rúguǒ and zhǐyào (both translatable as ‘if’), from a syntactic and a cognitive perspective. We examine their use in narrative and informative texts along four parameters: clause order, position of the connective within the clause, domain, and counterfactuality. For all parameters, the two connectives displayed robust profiles across genres. Both connectives preferred an antecedent-consequent clause order. They displayed flexibility in their position, behaving like adverbs, with rúguǒ showing a stronger preference for the pre-subject position than zhǐyào. In terms of domains, zhǐyào has a stronger preference for content conditionals than rúguǒ, which is also frequently used in the epistemic domain. In our data, only rúguǒ was used meta-metaphorically and in counterfactuals. We argue that both connectives can be translated with ‘if’, but zhǐyào also matches ‘so/as long as’.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Expressing conditionality in Chinese
    • 2.1Conditionals in spoken Chinese
    • 2.2Unconditionals, and necessary and sufficient conditionals in Chinese
    • 2.3Other linguistic markers expressing conditionality
    • 2.4Counterfactuals in Chinese
  • 3. Rúguǒ versus zhǐyào
    • 3.1Morphology and syntax of rúguǒ and zhǐyào
    • 3.2Semantics of rúguǒ and zhǐyào
  • 4.A cognitive approach to conditionals
    • 4.1Content domain
    • 4.2Epistemic domain
    • 4.3Speech-act domain
    • 4.4Metalinguistic domain
    • 4.5Meta-metaphorical domain
    • 4.6Metaspatial domain
  • 5.A corpus-based analysis of rúguǒ and zhǐyào
    • 5.1Corpus description
    • 5.2Sample
    • 5.3Analytical methods
      • 5.3.1Clause order and position of the connective
      • 5.3.2Domain
      • 5.3.3Counterfactuality
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Clause order
    • 6.2Position of the connectives
    • 6.3Domain distribution
    • 6.4Counterfactuality
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (50)
References
Au, T. 1983. Chinese and English counterfactuals: The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis revisited. Cognition 151: 155–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1984. Counterfactuals: In reply to Alfred Bloom. Cognition 171: 289–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1961/1979. Ifs and cans. In J. O. Urmson, and G. J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers (3rd edition). 205–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, R., and R. Pancheva. 2005. Conditionals. In M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. 638–687. Malder, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, A. 1981. The Linguistic Shaping of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1976. Aspects of Chinese Sociolinguistics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, G. 1988. Ying han jiashe tiaojianju bijiao [A formal description of Chinese expressions of hypothetical conditions in comparison with English]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 73 (1): 10–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, L., and J. Huang. 1996. Two types of donkey sentences. Natural Language Semantics 41: 121–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. 2000. Chinese conditionals and the theory of conditionals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 91: 1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chou, C. 2000. Chinese speakers’ acquisition of English conditionals: Acquisition order and L1 transfer effects. Second Language Studies 19 (1): 57–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1986. Conditionals: A typology. In E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. S. Reilly, and C. A. Ferguson (eds.), On Conditionals. 77–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. 1998. Conditionals and Prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., and E. Sweetser. 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Douven, I. 2016. The Epistemology of Indicative Conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evers-Vermeul, J., L. Degand, B. Fagard, and L. Mortier. 2011. Historical and comparative perspectives on subjectification: A corpus-based analysis of Dutch and French causal connectives. Linguistics 49 (2): 445–478.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A., J. S. Reilly, A. ter Meulen, & E. C. Traugott. 1986. Overview. In E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. S. Reilly, and C. A. Ferguson (eds.), On Conditionals. 3–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, C. E., and S. A. Thompson. 1986. Conditionals in Discourse. In E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. S. Reilly, and C. A. Ferguson (eds.), On Conditionals. 353–372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gauker, C. 2005. Conditionals in Context. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 541: 564–589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ippolito, M. 2013. Subjunctive Conditionals: A Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., and R. M. J. Byrne. 2002. Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review 109 (4): 646–678. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Conditionals and possibilities. In M. Oaksford and N. Chater (eds.), Cognition and Conditionals. 55–68. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C. N., and S. A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, F., J. Evers-Vermeul, and T. J. M. Sanders. 2013. Subjectivity and result marking in Mandarin: A corpus-based investigation. Chinese Language and Discourse 41: 74–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, F., Evers-Vermeul, J., and T. J. M. Sanders. 2016. On the subjectivity of Mandarin reason connectives: Robust profiles or genre-sensitivity? In N. Stukker, W. Spooren, and G. Steen (eds.), Genre in Language, Discourse and Cognition. 15–49. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lü, S. 1942. Zhongguo wenfa yaolüe. [Essentials of Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T., and A. Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T., and A. Wilson. 2001. Corpus Linguistics (2nd edition). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R. 2007. Inferential statistics in the context of empirical cognitive linguistics. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, and M. J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. 87–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, T., and E. Sweetser (eds). 2009. Causal Categories in Discourse and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmied, J. 1993. Qualitative and quantitative research approaches to English relative constructions. In C. Souter, and E. Atwell (eds.), Corpus Based Computational Linguistics. 85–96. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, J. 2003. Fuju san yu: Xing, zhi, yan [Compound sentences in three conceptual domains: Acting, knowing and uttering]. Chinese Language 294 (3): 195–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Fuci he lianci de yuanyu yongfa [Meta-linguistic usage of adverbs and conjunctions]. Research on Chinese as a Second Language 51: 113–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. Mingci he dongci [Nouns and Verbs]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, M. E. A. 2006. Biscuit conditionals: Quantification over potential literal acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 291: 167–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spooren, W., and L. Degand. 2010. Coding coherence relations: Reliability and validity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6 (2): 241–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. 1981. A theory of conditionals. In W. L. Harper, R. Stalnaker, and G. Pearce (eds.), Ifs: Conditionals, Beliefs, Decisions, Chance, and Time. 41–55. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tian, Y. 2006. Pingding fuci “jiu” de qiyi xianxiang [Ambiguities of the evaluative adverb jiu ]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. 1986. Conditionals and speech acts. In E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. S. Reilly, and C. A. Ferguson (eds.), On Conditionals. 197–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, C. 2010a. Hanyu tiaojianju xiaoju jian de yuxu leixing [Ordering patterns of clauses in conditional complex sentences in Chinese]. Shijie hanyu jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the World] 24 (4): 468–482.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010b. Jiashe xing dengji yu hanyu tiaojianju [Degree of hypotheticality and Chinese conditional sentences]. Hanyu xuebao [Chinese Linguistics] 32 (4): 59–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Tiaojianju fenlei de guoneiwai bijiao [A comparison of conditional categorization in China and West], Dongfang yuyan xue [Oriental Linguistics] 111: 115–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, L. 1943, 1944. Zhongguo xiandai yufa [Modern Chinese Grammar]. Shanghai: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, W., X. Zhang, M. Lu, and H. Cheng. 1994. Xiandai hanyu fuju xinjie [A New Study of Complex Sentences in Modern Chinese]. Shanghai: Huadong shifan daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wei, Y., Speelman, D., and J. Evers-Vermeul. (submitted). Collocation analyses at the discourse level using Chinese corpora. Submitted for publication.
Wierzbicka, A. 1997. Conditionals and counterfactuals: Conceptual primitives and linguistic universals. In A. Athanasiadou and R. Dirven (eds), On Conditionals Again. 15–60. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xing, F. 2001. Hanyu fuju yanjiu [A Study of Chinese Complex Sentences]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue