Cover not available

Article published In: Conversation Analysis in Chinese
Edited by Sandra A. Thompson and Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu
[Chinese Language and Discourse 7:2] 2016
► pp. 237–271

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Some interactional uses of syntactically incomplete turns in Mandarin conversation

 | University of Alberta
Published online: 23 December 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.7.2.03li
In everyday conversation, sometimes a speaker may not complete his/her turn, and the recipients do not treat it as problematic. This paper investigates this type of syntactically incomplete turns (henceforth, SITs) in Mandarin conversation. Specifically, this study examines how SITs are used and constructed through multimodal resources in Mandarin face-to-face conversation. Adopting the methodology of conversation analysis, interactional linguistics, and multimodal analysis, the present study examines 8 hours of everyday Mandarin face-to-face conversation. It shows that the SITs are situated in particular sequential environments and triggered by local contingencies. For example, they are used to accomplish socially and interactionally inappropriate actions and display sensitivity to the recipients’ disengagement from the ongoing talk and the current participation framework. Also, despite the syntactic incompleteness of the SITs, the prosodic and bodily-visual features involved in their production usually indicate possible turn completion.
References (87)
Auer, Peter. 2005. “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text 251: 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “On-line Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language.” Language Sciences 311: 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg R. 1990. “On the Local Sensitivity of Conversation.” In The Dynamics of Dialogue, ed. by Ivana Markovà, and Klaus Foppa, 201–226. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biq, Yung-O. 2001. “The Grammaticalization of Jiushi and Jiushishuo in Mandarin Chinese.” Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 27 (2): 53–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson, 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chevalier, Fabienne. 2008. “Unfinished Turns in French Conversations: How Context Matters.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 40 (1): 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chevalier, Fabienne and Rebecca Clift. 2008. “Unfinished Turns in French Conversation: Projectability, Syntax and Action.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (10): 1731–1752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert, and Susan Haviland. 1997. “Comprehension and the Given-New Contract.” In Discourse Production and Comprehension, ed. by Roy O. Freedle, 1–40. Hillside, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1996. “The Prosody of Repetition: On Quoting and Mimicry.” In Prosody in Conversation: Interactional studies, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 366–405. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2001. Introducing Interactional Linguistics. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret SeltingMargret Selting, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2004. “Conversation Analysis.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch, and Robert E. Sanders, 71–102. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey, Jr. 1972. “Some Signals and Rules for Talking Speaking Turns in Conversation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23(2):283–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. “On the Structure of Speaker-Auditor Interaction during Speaking Turns.” Language in Society 3(2):161–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey, Jr., and Donald W. Fiske. 1977. Face-To-Face Interaction: Research, methods, and theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey, Jr., and George Niederehe. 1974. “On Signalling That it’s Your Turn to Speak.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 101: 234–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esling, John H. 2014. “States of the Larynx in Laughter.” In Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Phonetics of Laughing, ed. by Jürgen Trouvain, and Nick Campbell, 15–20. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Mei [方梅]. 2000. “自然口語中弱化連詞的話語標記功能 [Reduced Conjunctions as Discourse Markers].” 中國語文 [ Zhongguo Yuwen ] 2000 (5): 459–470.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecelia, Barbara Fox, and Sandra Thompson. 1996. “Practices in the Construction of Turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited.” Pragmatics 61: 427–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecelia, and Sandra Thompson. 1996. Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 134–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecelia and Barbara Fox. 2010. Multiple Practices for Constructing Laughables. In Prosody in Interaction, ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, and Margret Selting, 339–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecelia, Sandra Thompson, and Veronika Drake. 2012. “Bodily-Visual Practices and Turn Continuation.” Discourse Processes 49 (3-4): 192–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1984 [1967]. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1978. “Response Cries.” Language 54 (4): 787–815. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1980. “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3-4): 272–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. “Gesture as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.” Semiotica 62 (1-2): 29–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffitt, Kira. 2008. Functions of Leaning in Episodes of Laughter: Laughter as visual phenomenon. Unpublished MA thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 37–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2003. “Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36(2): 109–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, and Junko Mori. 1998. “Co-construction in Japanese Revisited: We do Finish Each Other’s Sentences.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics Vol. 7, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, Hajime Hoji, Shoichi Iwasaki, Sung-Ock Sohn, and Susan Strauss, 77–93. Stanford: CSLI Publication.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2011. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic moments in interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriatel Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies of conversation analysis, ed. by Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1987. “Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R.E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2013. “The Interdependence of Bodily Demonstrations and Clausal Syntax.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (1): 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1967. “Some Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica 261: 22–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koshik, Irene. 2002. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 351: 277–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua. 1998. “The Discourse Functions of Dui A in Spoken Mandarin.” The Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies New Series 28 (4): 505–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kupetz, Maxi. 2014. “Empathy Displays as Interactional Achievements – Multimodal and Sequential Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 611: 4–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, and Ian Maddieson. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene. 1991. “On the Syntax of Sentence-in-Progress.” Langauge in Society 201: 441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996a. “Finding ‘Face’ in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 591: 303–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996b. “On the ‘Semi-permeable’ Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 238–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Turn-Sharing: The Choral Co-production of Talk-in-interaction.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra Thompson, 225–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “On the Place of Hesitating in Delicate Formulations: A Turn-constructional Infrastructure for Collaborative Indiscretion.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Jack Sidnell, Makoto Hayashi, and Geoffrey Raymond, 95–134. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles, and Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoting. 2013. “Language and the Body in the Construction of Units in Mandarin Face-to-Face Interaction.” In Units of Talk—Units of Action, ed. by Beatrice Szczepek Reed, and Geoffrey Raymond, 343–375. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2013. “Affiliation in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Tanya Stivers, and Jack Sidnell, 350–369. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Local, John, Bill Wells, and Mark Sebba. 1985. “Phonology for Conversation: Phonetic Aspects of Turn-delimitation in London Jamaican.” Journal of Pragmatics 91: 309–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Local, John, John Kelly, and William Wells. 1986. “Towards a Phonology of Conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English.” Journal of Pragmatics 22 (2): 411–437.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2007. “Multimodal Resources for Turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of Possible Next Speakers.” Discourse Studies 9 (2): 194–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, Paul, and Hans von Leden. 1958. “Dynamic Variations of the Vibratory Pattern in the Normal Larynx.” Folia Phoniatrica 101: 205–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mori, Junko, and Makoto Hayashi. 2006. “The Achievement of Intersubjectivity Through Embodied Completions: A study of Interactions between First and Second Language Speakers.” Applied Linguistics 27(2): 195–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. 1998. Redegebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte-Theorie-Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Arno Spitz Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard. 2001. “Turn Transition, Creak and Glottal Stop in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31 (1): 139–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olsher, David. 2004. ‘Talk and Gesture: The Embodied Completion of Sequential Actions in Spoken Interaction.” In Second Language Conversations, ed. by Rod Gardner, and Johannes Wagner, 221–245. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Omaggio Hadley, Alice. 1993. Teaching Language in Context. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Provine, Robert, and Yvonne Yong. 1991. “Laughter: A Stereotyped Human Vocalization.” Ethology 891: 115–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1974. “An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Richard Bauman and Joel Sherzer, 337–353. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1984. “On Some Gestures’ Relation to Talk.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies of conversation analysis, ed. by Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 266–296.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. “On the Organization of Sequences as a Source of ‘Coherence’ in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Conversational Organization and its Development, ed. by Bruce Dorval, 51–77. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. “Repair After Next Turn: The last structurally provided defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1295–1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society 29 (1): 1–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 1995. Prosodie im Gespräch: Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “The Construction of Units in Conversational Talk.” Language in Society 291: 477–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Arnulf Deppermann, Peter Gilles, Susanne Günthner, Martin Hartung, Friederike Kern, Christine Mertzlufft, Christian Meyer, Miriam Morek, Frank Oberzaucher, Jörg Peters, Uta Quasthoff, Wilfried Schütte, Anja Stukenbrock, Susanne Uhmann. 2009. A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121: 1–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan. 2002. “如何处置 ‘处置式’?—论把字句的主观性 [Can the Disposal Construction be Disposed of?—On the subjectivity of Ba-construction in Mandarin Chinese.]” 中国语文 Zhongguo Yuwen 2002 (5): 387–399.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2004. “‘No No No’ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction.” Human Communication Research 30 (2): 260–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell. 2005. “Introduction: Multimodal Interaction.” Semiotica 156 (1/4): 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 1995. “On Projection.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody, 87–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Forward-Gesturing.” Discourse Processes 46 (2): 161–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, and Ulrike Hartge. 1992. “Previews: Gestures at the Transition Place.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer, and Aldo Di Luzio, 135–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron (eds.). 2011. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wells, Bill, and Sarah Macfarlane. 1998. “Prosody as an Interactional Resource: Turn-projection and Overlap.” Language and Speech 411: 265–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wells, Bill, and Sue Peppé. 1996. “Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and Turn-taking in English Dialects.” In Prosody in Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 101–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue, and Celia Kitzinger. 2006. “Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 691: 150–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 2012. “Self-Praising Through Reporting: Strategic Use of Two Reporting Practices in Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Processes 491: 622–659. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Cao, Xiaoxiao, Wei Tong, Kenta Ono & Makoto Watanabe
2025. Evaluating the Role of Visual Fidelity in Digital Vtubers on Mandarin Chinese Character Learning. Informatics 12:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Xiaoyun, Xiaoting Li & Shui Li
2025. Pursuing student response through incomplete syntax, prosody, bodily- and visuo-orthographical resources in Chinese-as-a-second-language classrooms. Classroom Discourse 16:3 ► pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xiaoting & Yaqiong Liu
2023. Interactional functions of truncated predicative complement construction “AP + (dek)le” as topic initiator in Shanghai Wu Chinese conversation. Text & Talk 43:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Oloff, Florence
2022. The Particle Jako (“Like”) in Spoken Czech: From Expressing Comparison to Mobilizing Affiliative Responses. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Park, Yujong & Sungmin Park
2022. Eliciting student participation in synchronous online L2 lessons: The use of oral and written DIUs. Linguistics and Education 71 ► pp. 101085 ff. DOI logo
Shen, Qian & Shuangyun Yao
2022. Syntactically incomplete turns as delicate actions— A way to manage interpersonal relationships. Journal of Pragmatics 197 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Hofstetter, Emily, Leelo Keevallik & Agnes Löfgren
2021. Suspending Syntax: Bodily Strain and Progressivity in Talk. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Hilla Polak-Yitzhaki, Xiaoting Li, Ioana Maria Stoenica, Martin Havlík & Leelo Keevallik
2021. Multimodal Assemblies for Prefacing a Dispreferred Response: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Skogmyr Marian, Klara
2021. Assessing Without Words: Verbally Incomplete Utterances in Complaints. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Weiste, Elina
2021. Building an intersubjective understanding of the patient’s mental suffering. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xiaoting
2020. Click-Initiated Self-Repair in Changing the Sequential Trajectory of Actions-in-Progress. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:1 ► pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xiaoting
2021. Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 549 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xiaoting
2024. Managing progressivity and solidarity with nage shenme ‘that what’ in Mandarin interaction. In New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 36], ► pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Park, Innhwa & Jacob Kline
2020. Incomplete utterances as critical assessments. Discourse Studies 22:4 ► pp. 441 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue