Cover not available

Article published In: Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 6:2 (2015) ► pp.133–161

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Directive-giving and grammatical forms

Mitigation devices in a medical laboratory setting

 | The University of Hong Kong
 | City University of Hong Kong
 | Hong Kong Hospital Authority
Published online: 28 January 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.6.2.02cha
This paper investigates the use of grammatical forms in directive sequences by drawing on daily interactions between colleagues in a medical laboratory in Hong Kong. From a conversation analytic perspective, we focus on how directives in Cantonese are commonly formulated and how the force of a directive is mitigated. Our analysis shows that (1) the imperative seems to be the most frequently used syntactic form for giving directives and there is no apparent hierarchical (‘power’) differentiation, (2) the imperative-formulated directives are frequently mitigated by the use of a range of linguistic forms as well as interactional resources.
References (40)
Antaki, Charles, and Alexandra Kent. 2012. “Telling People What to Do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, Entitlement and Explanation in Staff Requests to Adults with Intellectual Impairments.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 876–889. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asmuß, Birte, and Jan Svennevig. 2009. “Meeting Talk: An Introduction.” Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilbow, Grahame. 1997. “Spoken Discourse in the Multicultural Workplace in Hong Kong: Applying a Model of Discourse as ‘Impression Management’.” In The Language of Business: An International Perspective, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Sandra Harris, 21–48. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Juliane House. 1989. “Cross-cultural and Situational Variation in Requestive Behavior.” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, 123–154. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boden, Deirdre. 1994. The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byon, Andrew Sangpil. 2006. “The Role of Linguistic Indirectness and Honorifics in Achieving Linguistic Politeness in Korean.” Journal of Politeness Research 21: 247–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Rong, Lin He, and Chunmei Hu. 2013. “Chinese Requests: In Comparison to American and Japanese Requests and with Reference to the “East-West Divide”.” Journal of Pragmatics 551: 140–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter. 2010. “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curl, Traci, and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage (eds). 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1976. “Is Sybil there? The Structure of some American English Directives.” Language in Society 51: 25–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Xiaoyan. 2003. Guangzhou Fangyan Jumo Yuqi Zhuci [Sentence-Final Mood Particles of the Guangzhou Cantonese]. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukushima, Saeko. 2000. Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. “Participation, Affect, and Trajectory in Family Directive/Response Sequences.” Text & Talk 26 (4/5): 515–543. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 2003. “Politeness and Power: Making and Responding to ‘Requests’ in Institutional Settings.” Text 23 (1): 27–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and institutions. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe. 2003. Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keisanen, Tinna, and Mirka Rauniomaa. 2012. “The Organisation of Participation and Contingency in Prebeginnings of Request Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (4): 323–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koester, Almut. 2010. Workplace Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwok, Helen. 1984. Sentence Particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Strategy and Linguistic Preference of Requests by Cantonese Learners of English: An Interlanguage and Cross-cultural Comparison.” Multilingua 301: 99–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee-Wong, Song Mei. 2000. Politeness and Face in Chinese Culture. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. (2nd edition). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2014. “Instructions in the Operating room: How the Surgeon Directs their Assistant’s Hands.” Discourse Studies 16 (2): 131–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pufahl Bax, Ingrid. 1986. “How to Assign Work in an Office: A Comparison of Spoken and Written Directives in American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 101: 673–692. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Upadhyay, Shiv R. 2003. “Nepali Requestive Acts: Linguistic Indirectness and Politeness Reconsidered.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1651–1677. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Directives at Work: Exploring the Contextual Complexity of Workplace Directives.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1395–1405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigel, Margaret M., and Ronald M. Weigel. 1985. “Directive use in a Migrant Agricultural Community: A Test of Ervin-Tripp’s Hypotheses.” Language in Society 141: 63–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2003. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. (2nd edition). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J. 2005. “Interactional and sequential configurations informing request format selection in children’s speech.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen and Margret Selting, 185–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Du-Babcock, Bertha & Angela Chi Kuen Chan
2019. Can Simulated Data be Comparable to Authentic Data?: A Comparative Analysis of Meeting Chairing Activities. Business Communication Research and Practice 2:2 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Lim, Ni-Eng
2019. Introduction. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 10:2 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Chan, Angela
2017. Constructing a “competent” meeting chair. In Identity Struggles [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 69], ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue