Cover not available

Article published In: Current Trends in Chinese Discourse
Edited by Wei Wang and Linda Tsung
[Chinese Language and Discourse 5:1] 2014
► pp. 79–97

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Comparing classifier use in 1995 and 2010 early child Cantonese to explore social change in Hong Kong

 | The University of Hong Kong
Published online: 12 September 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.5.1.04li
This study compared and analysed the classifier usage in two cohorts: the 492 Cantonese-speaking young children tested in 1995 (Tse & Li, 2011), and the 143 children tested in 2010 (Li &Tse, 2011). The results indicated that: (1) the 1995 and 2010 cohorts shared the same 8 most commonly used classifiers, 個 go3, 隻 zek3, 架 gaa3, 杯 bui1, 把 baa2, 嚿 gau6, 張 zoeng1, 間 gaan1; (2) Two top 10 classifiers were found in the 2010 cohort: 支 zi1, and 部 bou6; (3) both cohorts overused the general classifier 個 go3; and (4) both cohorts overused 隻 zek3 and 嚿 gau6 to replace sortal classifiers and even to replace the general classifier 個 go3. The pragmatic features and the associated social changes were discussed to understand the minor changes in classifier use between 1995 and 2010 cohorts.
References (18)
Allan, Keith. 1977. “Classifiers.” Language 531: 285-311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley. 2000. “The Sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the Space for Hong Kong English.” World Englishes 191: 265-285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erbaugh, Mary S. (1986). “Taking Stock : The Development of Chinese Noun Classifiers : Historically and in Young Children.” In Typological Studies in Language : Noun classes and Categorization, Vol. 71, ed. by Colette G. Craig, 399-436. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Classifiers are for Specification : Complementary Functions for Sortal and General Classifiers in Cantonese and Mandarin.” Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 31 (1): 33-69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Fuxi. 1985. “An Experiment on the Use of Classifiers by 4 to 6 Year Olds.” Acta Psychological Sinica 171: 384-392.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: a Functional Reference Grammar. The University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Hui, and Nirmala Rao. 2000. “Parental Influences on Chinese Literacy Development: A Comparison of Preschoolers in Beijing, Hong Kong and Singapore.” International Journal of Behavioural Development 24 (1): 82-90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Hui, Nirmala Rao, and Shek Kam K. Tse. 2011. “Bridging the Gap: A Longitudinal Study of the Relationship between Pedagogical Continuity and Early Chinese Literacy Acquisition.” Early Years31 (1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Hui, and Shek Kam K. Tse. 2011. The Early Child Mandarin (Cantonese) Corpus. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mak, David Lai-Woon. 1991. The Acquisition of Classifiers in Cantonese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Reading.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip. 1994. Cantonese : A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokes, Stephanie., and Lydia K.H. So. 1997. “Classifier Use of Language Disordered and Age-matched Cantonese Speaking Children.” Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 21: 83–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szeto, K.K.S. 1998. The Acquisition of Cantonese Classifiers. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hong Kong. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tse, Shek Kam, and Hui Li. 2011. Early Child Cantonese: Facts and Implications. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tse, Shek Kam, Hui Li, and Shing On Leung. 2007. “The Acquisition of Cantonese Classifiers by Preschool Children in Hong Kong.” Journal of Child Language 34 (2): 495-517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, Cathy S.P. (2000). “How Cantonese-speaking Two-year-olds Fend for Themselves through the Ticket of Classifier.” In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Child Language Research Forum, ed. by Eve V. Clark, 149–158. Stanford: Centre for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Tsung, Linda & Dandan Wu
2021. A Corpus-Based Comparison of the Pragmatic Use of Qian and Hou to Examine the Applicability of Space–Time Metaphor Hypothesis in Early Child Mandarin. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Nagy, Naomi & Samuel Lo
2019. Classifier use in Heritage and Hong Kong Cantonese. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 5:1 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue