Article published In: Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 17:1 (2026) ► pp.1–35
More than a summarizing conjunction
Some emerging conversation interactional uses of Zongzhi ‘in sum’ in Mandarin Chinese
Published online: 29 August 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.24040.liu
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.24040.liu
Abstract
As a linking element, zongzhi ‘in sum, to sum up’ displays archaic qualities and is most commonly
associated with formal written Chinese discourse. However, this paper demonstrates that zongzhi can also be
deployed in dialogic interactions in contemporary spoken Chinese to accomplish distinct social actions. Drawing on a variety of
dialogic data, we identify a major distinction between tokens produced by the primary speaker and those produced by the
respondent. Tokens from the primary speaker fall into three subcategories, corresponding to a person-based grouping:
(1) first-person tokens are used to display the speaker’s affective stance toward the stated situation; (2) second-person tokens
can address the interlocutor’s concerns; and (3) third-person tokens function primarily for informing and/or explaining. Although
zongzhi-prefaced turns by respondents are relatively rare, they are noteworthy for their role in transforming
the participation framework with distinct interactional functions. Additionally, zongzhi tokens are often
associated with prosodic prominence and occur at points of conversation sequential transition. We offer a unified account of these
diverse uses by linking them to some of the requirements of sequence closings in conversation. We conclude by discussing the
broader implications of these findings for understanding lexical expressions of summarization, totality, and/or inclusivity. We
emphasize that viewing grammar and social interaction as interdependent provides a productive framework for analyzing lexical
tokens cutting across both written and spoken genres, as well as their variation within speech registers.
Keywords: zongzhi, in sum, summarizing, linking, closing device, genres, totality, inclusivity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Written and dialogic genres
- 3.Spoken data and some analytic notions
- 4.Zongzhi tokens produced by the same primary speaker
- 4.1First person-based tokens for subjective affective stance marking
- 4.2Second person-based tokens to address interlocutor concerns
- 4.3Third person-based tokens for informing and argumentation
- 4.4Interim summary
- 5.‘Zongzhi’ produced by the respondent
- 6.Other notable features in interactional language
- 7.Discussion
- 7.1Making connections among features
- 7.2Making connections with the same class tokens
- 8.Conclusions
References
References (33)
Biq, Yung-O. 1991. “The
Multiple Uses of the Second Person Singular Pronoun Ni in Conversational
Mandarin.” Journal of
Pragmatics 16 (4): 307–321.
Canavan, Ann, and George Zipperlen. 1996. Callfriend
Mandarin Chinese–Mainland Dialect. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia. [URL]
Cao, Xiuling, and Liu Liu. 2015. “Xiandai Hanyu Zongjielei Huayu Biaoji Qianxi [An Analysis of
Modern Chinese Conclusive Markers].” Sinologia
Hispanica 11: 59–68.
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. “Cognitive
constraints on information flow.” In Coherence and Grounding in
Discourse, edited by Russel S. Tomlin, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1994. Discourse,
Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and
Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Du Bois, John W., Susanna Cumming, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, and Danae Paolino. 1993. “Discourse
transcription.” Santa Barbara Papers in
Linguistics, 41.
Duranti, Alessandro, and Charles Goodwin. 1992. Rethinking
context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge University Press.
Francis, W. N., and H. Kučera. 1964. Manual
of Information to Accompany a Standard Sample of Present-day Edited American English, for Use with Digital
Computers. Providence, R.I.: Department of Linguistics, Brown University.
Gao, Hua, and Hongyin Tao. 2021. “Fanzheng
‘Anyway’ as a Discourse Pragmatic Particle in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Locus, and Interactional
Function.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1731: 148–166.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. “Participant, Affect, and
Trajectory in Family Directive/Response Sequences.” Text and
Talk 26 (4/5): 513–542.
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 2004. “Participation”. In A
Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, edited by Alessandro Duranti, 222–243. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Heritage, John. 2012. “Epistemics
in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 45 (1): 1–29.
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2018. Between
Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across
Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Labov, William and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative
analysis”. Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, edited
by J. Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press. Reprinted in Journal of Narrative and Life
History 71:3–38, 1997.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2006. “On the Human ‘Interactional
Engine’.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and
Interaction, edited by N. J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. Oxford: Berg.
Liu, Feilu. 2008. “‘Zongzhi’ de Yuyi he Yuyong Gongneng Fenxi [Analyses of the Semantics and Pragmatics of ‘Zongzhi’].” Journal of Shiyan
Technical
Institute 21 (1): 90–93.
Park, Innhwa. 2010. “Marking
an Impasse: The Use of Anyway as a Sequence-Closing Device.” Journal of
Pragmatics 421: 3283–3299.
Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “On
the analyzability of stories by children.” In Directions in
sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, edited by J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, 325–345. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A
simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for
conversation”. Language 501, 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization: A Primer in
Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Su, Dan. 2019. The
M. Chinese Video Corpus (MCVC). UCLA, Los Angeles and University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units
in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse, and grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2024. “An
interactional approach to generic second person expressions in Mandarin
conversation.” In (Non)referentiality in
Conversation, edited by Michael C. Ewing and Ritva Laury, 167–202. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tao, Hongyin, and Hua Gao. 2022. “Fanzheng
‘Anyway’ as a Mitigator in Adversity in Mandarin Conversation.” Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu
Yanjiu [Language Research and
Teaching] 216 (4): 68–78.
Tao, Hongyin, and Richard Xiao. 2007/2020. The
UCLA Corpus of Written Chinese. Los Angeles: UCLA; Lancaster: UCREL.
Wang, Hong, and Mingsheng Lü. 2015. “Wenben Zhong ‘Zongzhi (Zongeryanzhi)’ Xinxi Suoyin Gongneng
Fenxi [Analyses of the Information-Indexing Function of
‘Zongzhi’ in Texts].” Research on Library
Science 65–69.
Wu, Haiping. 2015. “Encoding
subjectivity with totality: A corpus-based study of [zhengge yi (CL)+X] in Mandarin.” Journal
of Pragmatics 831: 27–40.
Wu, Haiping, and Hongyin Tao. 2018. “Expressing
(inter)subjectivity with universal quantification: A pragmatic account of Plural NP + dou expressions in Mandarin
Chinese.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1281, 1–21.
Yu, Guodong, Yaqiong Wu, Paul Drew, and Chase W. Raymond. 2024. “The
DIG Mandarin Conversations (DMC) Corpus: Mundane Telephone Calls in Mandarin Chinese as Resources for Research and
Teaching.” Chinese Language and
Discourse 15 (1): 105–141.
