Article published In: Lexical semantics towards the big-data era
Edited by Meichun Liu and Chunyu Kit
[Chinese Language and Discourse 14:1] 2023
► pp. 18–49
The Multifunctionality of Mandarin Diào 掉
A cross-linguistic perspective
Published online: 9 June 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.21016.jin
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.21016.jin
Abstract
This paper explores the various functions of diào in Mandarin Chinese as it changes from a verb to a phase marker. As a phase marker, diào provides a natural endpoint to a co-occurring event and indicates completion, which is a distinct function from the perfect marker le. In this shift, the meaning of diào also expands, including ‘falling down’, ‘throwing down’, ‘disappearing’, ‘removal’, ‘completion’ and ‘change of state’. The multifunctionality of diào is the result of grammaticalization along with semantic change and extension. Cognitive mechanisms such as metonymic and metaphoric extensions, pragmatic inferencing, analogy on Verb-Complement structures, and semantic generalization all contribute to the grammaticalization of diào, with further influence from contact with southern Chinese dialects. This paper further argues that the grammaticalization and semantic extension of diào is in accordance with the development of aspectual markers cross-linguistically, reflecting the commonality in human cognition.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Multifunctionality of Diào in Mandarin Chinese
- 2.1Fall/Drop
- 2.2Lost/Disappear
- 2.3Detached/Removed
- 2.4Completion
- 2.5Change of State
- 3.The Nature of Diào in the V Diào Structure
- 3.1Grammatical Functions
- 3.2Verb Selection
- 3.2.1Situation types
- 3.2.2Semantics
- 3.3Negative Form
- 3.4Sentence Completion
- 4.The Grammaticalization of Diào
- 4.1The Grammaticalization Process
- 4.1.1Stage 1
- 4.1.2Stage 2
- 4.1.3Stage 3
- 4.1.4Stage 4
- 4.2Discourse-Cognitive Mechanisms for Grammaticalization
- 4.2.1Metonymic and metaphoric extensions
- 4.2.2Pragmatic inferencing
- 4.2.3Analogy on VC: Semantic and morphological correlation
- 4.2.4Semantic generalization of diào over event types
- 4.3Dialect Contact: The Influence of Southern Chinese Varieties
- 4.1The Grammaticalization Process
- 5.From Motion to Completion: Cross-Linguistic Evidence
- 5.1Phie35 and Ka45 in Southern Chinese Dialects
- 5.2Lexical Semantic Similarities in Other Languages
- 5.2.1Functional ranges of Korean pelita and Japanese shimau
- 5.2.2Semantic preference and collocational restriction
- 5.2.3Generalization and subjectification: Further development of pelita and shimau
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (45)
Abe, Sayaka. 2007. “Space, time, subjectivity and beyond: the cognitive semantic development of the Japanese marker -te-shimau.” PhD diss., State University of New York at Buffalo.
Austin, Peter K. 2013. A Grammar of Diyari, South Australia (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baik, Junghye. 2016. “On Grammatical Evolution of Korean Displacement Verb Pelita ‘Throw Away’ From a Grammaticalization Perspective.” International Journal of language and linguistics, 11:49–56.
Barcelona, Antonio. 2003. “Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update.” In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, eds. by René Dirven and Ralf Pörings, 207–278. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bybee, Joan, and Östen Dahl. 1989. “The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world.” Studies in Language, 131:51–103.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cao, Jin. 2009. “‘V Diao’ De Yufahua [the Grammaticalization of “V Diao”].” Qiannan Minzu Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao [Journal of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities], 21:6-21+67.
Chen, Shuhuan. 2010. “Huizhou Fangyan de Wanchengti Zhuci Pao he [ei55] [Auxiliaries of Perfect Aspect Pao and [ei55] in Huizhou Dialect].” Huizhou Xueyuan Xuebao [Journal of Huizhou University], 41:8–14.
Chu, Chengxi. 2016. “‘Wancheng’ ‘Youjie’ he ‘Le1’ de Yinxian: Yuyi Jufa yu Pianzhang de Fen’gong Hezuo [A study of ‘Perfectivity’ ‘Boundedness’ and ‘the Looming of Le1’ from the Interface of Semantics, Syntax and Discourse].” In Xiandai Hanyu Yuyanxue zhi Fu: Zhao Yuanren Xiansheng Jinian Lunwenji [Commemorative Essays for YuenRen Chao, Father of Modern Chinese Linguistics], eds. by Chi-on Chin, Bit-chee Kwok, and Benjamin Tsou, 162–172. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: the Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dai, Yaojing. 1996. “Ganyu Taihe fangyan de wanchengti [Perfects in the Gan dialects at Taihe country].” In Dongci de Ti [Aspects of verbs], ed. by Shuangqing Zhang, 97–113. Hong Kong: T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre, Institute of Chinese Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Gan, Yu’en, and Fang Wu. 2005. “Guangdong Siyi fangyan de ‘jian’ zi ju [‘Jian’ sentences in the dialect of Siyi in Guangdong Province].” Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 21:158–159.
Genetti, Carol. 1986. “The grammaticalization of the Newari verb tol.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 91: 53–69.
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hu, Zhenhua. 1986. Keerkezi yu Jianzhi [A brief introduction to Kirgiz]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe [The Ethnic Publishing House].
Jiang, Shaoyu. 2000. “Hanyu Dongjieshi Chansheng de Shidai [the Times when Chinese Verb-Resultative Complement Emerged].” In Hanyu Cihui Yufa Shi Lunwenji [Collection of papers on the History of Chinese Vocabulary and Grammar], ed. by Shaoyu Jiang, 240–262. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [the Commercial Press].
Jing, Gaowa, and Liping Xia. 2020. “Hanyu Fangyan Quchuyi Biaoji de Duogongnengxing yanjiu [A Study of the Multifunctionality of Removal Markers in Chinese Dialect].” Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies in Language and Linguistics], 31: 46–54.
Kövecses, Zoltán, and Günter Radden. 1998. “Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view.” Cognitive Linguistics, 11: 37–78.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog, and Seongha Rhee. 2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Li, Fei, and Changyan Wen. 2013. “Dabu kejiahua biao wancheng de 撇(phɛt3)” [Completive mark ‘撇(phɛt3)’in Dabu Hakka dialect].” Jiayingxueyuan Xuebao [Journal of Jiaying University], 91:19–24.
Li, Rulong. 1996. “Quanzhou fangyan de ti [Aspects in Quanzhou dialect].” In Dongci de Ti [Aspects of verbs], ed. by Shuangqing Zhang, 195–224. Hong Kong: T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre, Institute of Chinese Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Liu, Meichun. 2015. “Tense and Aspect in Mandarin Chinese.” In The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, eds. by William S-Y. Wang and Chaofen Sun, 274–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liu, Yan. 2007. “‘V diao’ de yuyi leixing yu ‘diao’ de xuhua [Semantic Categories of V Diao and Grammaticalization of Diao].” Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 21: 133-143+191-192
Nayar, Devi. 1983. “Verb Sequences in Malayalam.” PhD diss., New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University.
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Ryoko Suzuki. 1992. “The development of a marker of speakers attitude: the pragmatic use of the Japanese grammaticized verb shimau in conversation.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 181: 204–213.
Ono, Tsuyoshi. 1992. “The Grammaticalization of the Japanese Verbs Oku and Shimau.” Cognitive Linguistics, 41: 367–390.
Rhee, Seongha. 1996. “Pragmatic inferences and grammaticalization of serial verbs of displacement in Korean.” In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, eds. by Jan Johnson, Matthew L. Juge, and Jeri L. Moxley, 328–339. February 16–19, University of California, Berkeley.
Smith, Carlotta S. 1994. “Aspectual Viewpoint and Situation Type in Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 31: 107–146.
Strauss, Susan. 2003. “Completive aspect, emotion, and the dynamic eventive: the case of Korean V-a/e pelita, Japanese V-te shimau, and Spanish se.” Linguistics, 411:653–679.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Richard Dasher. 2001. Regularity of Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. “From subjectification to intersubjectification.” In Motives for Language Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2010. “(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: a reassessment.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, eds. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–74. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Wang, Danrong. 2014. “Lun dongci, Xingrongci hou ‘diao’ de yiyi xuhua [On the semantic bleaching of diao after verbs and adjectives].” Hubei Minzu Xueyuan Xuebao [Journal of Hubei Minzu University], 51:164–168.
Wang, Nan. 2016. “Danyinjie dongci feizizhu yongfa yu xiaoji jieguoyi [Non-volitional use of monosyllabic verbs and its negative-result meaning].” Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 21:228–256.
Watanabe, Kazuha. 2000. “The Grammaticalization of Aspect in Japanese.” Ms. Department of Linguisitcs, University of California, Davis.
Xia, Liping. 2020. Xiangyu yiyang (Nijiangkou) fangyan cankao yufa [Reference Grammar of Yiyang (Nijiangkou) in Xiang dialect]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [The Commercial Press].
