Cover not available

Article published In: Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 13:2 (2022) ► pp.242–274

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Factuality lens

Choosing the unmarked passive construction in Chinese conversation

ORCiD logo with link | University of Arkansas
Published online: 11 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.21005.su
Abstract
Why do speakers choose the Mandarin Chinese unmarked passive construction (UP) in conversation when they have other grammatical alternatives with roughly the same semantics? From the perspective of subjectivity, this study identifies the Factuality lens, a lens through which a situation is presented as a “fact” or a “truth” regardless of reality. My analysis of a video corpus of spontaneous talk show conversations using the discourse adjacent alternation method reveals that speakers tend to choose UP over other constructions to present a transitive event through the Factuality lens by emphasizing the factuality of a fact or making a non-fact appear as a fact – either deceivingly or openly in a fictitious narrative or a joke. The findings reveal that grammatical constructions can linguistically recreate a situation different from reality. The conclusion that Factuality lens is a factor that could influence speakers’ grammatical choice casts light on pragmatic consequence of grammatical choice and subjectivity in language use.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Grammatical choices and their pragmatic consequences
    • 2.2Subjectivity and lens
    • 2.3The Chinese unmarked passive (UP) construction
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1Definitions of the new term identified in this study
    • 3.2Data
    • 3.3Method
  • 4.Results and analysis
    • 4.1Choosing unmarked passive to present a situation as a “fact”
      • 4.1.1Choosing unmarked passive to present a factual situation as a fact
      • 4.1.2Choosing unmarked passive to present a non-fact as a “fact”
        • 4.1.2.1Presenting a non-fact as a “fact” in hope that the audience believes so
        • 4.1.2.2Presenting a hypothetical situation as a “fact” in a fictitious narrative or a joke
    • 4.2Choosing unmarked passive to present a situation as a “truth”
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Main findings and explanation
    • 5.2Theoretical discussions
      • 5.2.1The factuality lens
      • 5.2.2Factuality and the co-occurrence of grammatical constructions
      • 5.2.3Information structure
  • 6.Conclusions and implications
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect.” Text 9 (1): 93–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The stance triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Englebretson, Robert, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1990. “Politics and grammar: Agency in Samoan political discourse.” American Ethnologist 171: 646–666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2007a. “Grammatical resources for social purposes: Some aspects of stancetaking in colloquial Indonesian conversation.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Englebretson, Robert, 69–110. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (Ed). 2007b. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1977. “The case for case reopened.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 8: Grammatical Relations, ed. by P. Cole and J. M. Sadock, 59–81. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentens, Caroline, María Sol Sansiñena, Stef Spronck, and An Van linden. 2019. “Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches.” Pragmatics 29 (2): 155–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hazlett, Allan. 2010. “The Myth of factive verbs.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 80 (3): 497–522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi, and Foong Ha Yap (Eds). 2015. Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 831[special issue]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jin, Dawei, and Jun Chen. 2019. “Scalarity, degree reading and maximality in a Mandarin numeral construction.” Language and Linguistics 20 (2): 148–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, M. Agnes. 2018. “Visual arguments and discriminatory discourse: Comparing modes and affordances in representations of Mainland Chinese in Hong Kong.” Language & Communication 601: 94–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. “Some observations on factivity.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 41: 55–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky. 1971. “Fact.” In preparation in Linguistics, ed. by M. Bierwisch and K. E. Heidolph, 143–173. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topics, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2007. “Cognitive Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (Oxford Handbooks), ed. by Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens, 421–462. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Yuehua, Wenyu Pan, & Wei Gu. 2001. Shiyong Xiandai Hanyu Yufa [Practical Grammar of Modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Local, John, and Walker, Gareth. 2008. “Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources.” Text & Talk 28 (6): 723–747. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1982. “Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, Ergo Sum?” In Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, ed. by R. J. Jarvella, and W. Klein, 101–124. Chichester & New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, and Schieffelin, Bambi. 1989. “Language has a heart.” Text & Talk 91: 7–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saurí, Roser, and Pustejovsky, James. 2012. “Are you sure that this happened? Assessing the factuality degree of events in text.” Computational Linguistics – COLI. 381: 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, Danjie, and Lu, Jianming. 2010. “The construction-chunking approach for syntactic analysis and second language teaching.” Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Journal of Chinese Teaching in the World] 24 (4): 557–567.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, Danjie. 2012. “Construction as a chain of chunks: Theoretical framework of the construction-chunking approach.” Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences] 58 (3): 241–253.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017a. “Significance as a lens: Understanding the Mandarin ba construction through Discourse Adjacent Alternation.” Journal of Pragmatics 1171: 204–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. A Discourse Approach to the Functions of Major Chinese Grammatical Constructions and Their Alternations in Conversation (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Discourse-pragmatic functions of a Chinese topic-comment construction and L2 teaching strategies based on authentic media materials.” Taiwan Journal of Chinese as a Second Language 16 (1): 55–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. The M. Chinese Video Corpus (MCVC). UCLA, Los Angeles & University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (In preparation). Subjectivity in language use: How lens differs from stance.
Su, Danjie & Hongyin Tao. 2018. Teaching the shi…de construction with authentic materials in elementary Chinese, Chinese as a Second Language Research 7(1). 111–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin, and Yaqiong Liu. 2010. “From register differences to grammatical differences: Grammatical constructions in natural speech and the media (Part 1).” Dangdai Xiuci Xue [Contemporary Rhetoric] (1): 37–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2001. “Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember.” In Corpus linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium, ed. by Simpson, Rita, and John Swale, 116–144. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallauri, E. L., and Masia, V. 2018. “Context and information structure constraints on factivity: the case of know.” Language Sciences 661: 103–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2019. “Changing perspectives: Something old, something new.” Pragmatics 29 (2): 170–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Haiping. 2015. “Encoding subjectivity with totality: A corpus-based study of [zhengge yi (CL) + X] in Mandarin.” In Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages, ed. by Iwasaki, Shoichi, and Foong Ha Yap, 27–40. Journal of Pragmatics 831[special issue]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Wei. 2016. Jiyu yuliaoku de xiandai Hanyu biaoshi panduan yiyi “shi…de” jushi fazhan [A corpus-based analysis on the evolvement of Chinese judgmental shi…de structure]. Waiyu Yu Waiyu Jiaoxue [Foreign Languages and Their Teaching] 290(5). 20–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Chunshen. 1996. “Syntactic status of the agent: Its significance for information presentation in translating the passive between Chinese and English.” Multilingua 15 (4): 397–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Su, Danjie
2023. Speakers’ subjective evaluation of adversity. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 14:2 ► pp. 328 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue