Article published In: Media Language and Discourse in Cultural China
Edited by Doreen D. Wu, Ming Liu and David C.S. Li
[Chinese Language and Discourse 13:1] 2022
► pp. 143–165
Intellectual discourse on Chinese media in times of the coronavirus
Published online: 29 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.20029.tan
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.20029.tan
Abstract
This paper investigates intellectual discourse in China during the COVID-19 coronavirus crisis through two discourse analyses, aiming to see the role of intellectuals in leading public discussion and perception on government decisions in times of crisis. Digital ethnography and digital discourse analysis are implemented to do a micro and in-depth analysis of texts and the media engagement of the Chinese intellectuals. In the context in which the presence and reception of public intellectuals in China has been transformed from pro-West gongzhi (公知) to intellectuals in the system (体制内), this study reviews the moral values and norms that promoted governmental policies and social coherence embedded in a new intellectual discourse. It contributes to the analysis of the dynamics and flexibility of China’s public communication in times of crisis within the social context in which online activities and offline realities are closely bonded in modern China.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The need for authority and intellectuals as media celebrities
- 2.1Gongzhi and intellectuals ‘in the system’
- 2.2Public communication in crisis: Facticity and interaction
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Embedded moral values in defining truth and normality
- 4.1Seeking truth from facts: A historical value
- 4.2The collective memory on rumors and professionalism
- 4.3Talking politics in an unofficial way
- 5.Findings and discussion
- Notes
References
References (41)
Berger, Peter L. & Luckmann, Thomas. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday.
. (2015). Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology, 441, 105–116.
. (2018). Durkheim and the Internet: Sociolinguistics and the sociological imagination. Bloomsbury Academic.
. (2019). Political discourse in post-digital societies. Retrieved from [URL]
Blommaert, Jan & Dong, Jie. (2010). Ethnographic fieldwork: A beginner’s guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Briggs, Charles L. & Bauman, Richard. (1992). Genre, Intertextuality, and Social Power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 21: 131–172.
Chanley, Virginia A., Rudolph, Thomas J. & Rahn, Wendy M. (2000). The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis, Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (3): 239–256,
Chen, Gong. (2010). A new exploration on the information disclosure mechanism of crisis communication in the Web age (wangluo shidai weiji chuanbo de xinxi gongkai jizhi xintan). China Publishing Journal, (02): 5–7.
Collini, Stefan. (2009 [2006]). Absent minds, intellectuals in Britain. Reprint. Oxford University Press.
Cucciniello, Maria & Nasi, Greta. (2014). Transparency for Trust in Government: How Effective is Formal Transparency? International Journal of Public Administration, 37 (13): 911–921.
Dahlgren, P. (2012). Public Intellectuals, Online Media, and Public Spheres: Current Realignments. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 251: 95–110.
Gonçalves, Arnaldo. (2016). The Role of Intellectuals and Political Oratory in Modern Democracies. Pyrex Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 2 (1): 21–26.
Gramsci, Antonio. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowel Smith. New York: International Publishers.
Han, Rongbin. (2018). Withering Gongzhi: Cyber Criticism of Chinese Public Intellectuals. International Journal of Communication. 121. 1966–1987.
Heynders, Odile. (2016). Writers as Public Intellectuals: Literature, Celebrity, Democracy. Palgrave Studies in Modern European Literature. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hou, Mingyi. (2019). Where have the Chinese public intellectuals gone? Diggit Magazine. Rertrieved from [URL]
Hymes, Dell. (1996). Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality. Toward an Understanding of Voice. London: Taylor & Francis.
Jacobs, Ronald & Townsley, Eleanor. (2012). The Space of Opinion: Media Intellectuals and the Public Sphere. The Space of Opinion: Media Intellectuals and the Public Sphere, 1–312.
Jones, R. H. (2009). ‘Dancing, skating and sex: action and text in the digital age’, Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(3): 283–302.
Jones, R., Chik, A., & Hafner, C. A. (Eds.) (2015). Discourse and Digital Practices. London: Routledge.
Karlova, Natascha A. & Fisher, Karen E. (2013). A Social Diffusion Model of Misinformation and Disinformation for Understanding Human Information Behaviour. Retrieved from [URL]
Klimeš, O. & Marinelli, M. (2018). Introduction: Ideology, Propaganda, and Political Discourse in the Xi Jinping Era. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 231: 313–322.
Lee, Eric. (2013). A tale of two political systems. Retrieved from [URL]
Lee, Kaman. (2009). How the Hong Kong Government Lost the Public Trust in SARS: Insights for Government Communication in a Health Crisis. Public Relations Review, 351: 74–76.
Li, Xin. (2015). Publicity, knowledge production, and the “mediated presence” of Chinese intellectuals (gonggongxing, zhishi shengchan yu zhongguo zhishi fenzi de “meijiehua” zaichang. Jinan Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 000 (002): 24–29.
Li, Yongjin. (2018). The continuity and development of Mao Zedong Thought in the socialism with Chinese characteristics in Xi Jinping’s New Era (Xi Jinping xinshidai zhongguo tese shehui zhuyi sixiang dui Mao Zedong sixiang de jicheng he fazhan). Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology, 21 (5): 17–18.
Maly, Ico. (2018). Populism as a mediatized communicative relation: The birth of algorithmic populism. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 2131. Retrieved from [URL]
Niu, Huiqing. (2011). A study on relationship between Chinese intellectuals and TV media (zhongguo zhishifenzi yu dianshi meiti guanxi yanjiu). Communication University of China Press.
OECD (2013). “Trust in government, policy effectiveness and the governance agenda”, in Government at a Glance 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris,
Peterson, Eskild et al. (2020). Editorial. Li Wenliang, a face to the frontline healthcare worker. The first doctor to notify the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2, (COVID-19), outbreak. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 931: 205–207. Retrieved from [URL]
Sagarin, Edward & Kelly, Robert J. (1969). “Karl Mannheim and the Sociology of Knowledge”. Salmagundi (10/11): 292–302.
Semino, Elena, Deignan, Alice & Littlemore, Jeannette. (2013). Metaphor, Genre, and Recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 (1): 41–59.
Song, Cheng. (2020). Web celebrity of knowledge: The role of transformation of intellectuals in postmodern society. Editorial Friend, 3 (5): 78–82.
Thomas, C. W. (1998). Maintaining and Restoring Public Trust in Government Agencies and their Employees. Administration & Society, 30 (2): 166–193. Retrieved from
Van de Walle, S. & Bouckaert, Geert. (2003). Public Service Performance and Trust in Government: The Problem of Causality, International Journal of Public Administration, 29 (8 & 9): 891–913.
Vasu, N., et al. (2018). Fake news: National security in the post truth era. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. Retrieved August 15, 2021, from [URL]
Wang, Yiran & Mark, Gloria. (2013). Trust in Online News: Comparing Social Media and Official Media Use by Chinese Citizens. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Association for Computing Machinery, New York: 599–610.
