Article published In: Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 16:1 (2025) ► pp.28–54
Mandarin posture verbs
Cardinality, patterns of usage, and constructional preferences
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Alberta.
Published online: 21 May 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00048.new
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00048.new
Abstract
Posture verbs have attracted considerable interest within Cognitive Linguistics. This study continues this line of
research by investigating usage-based patterns associated with these verbs when used in their literal posture senses. The data for
the study comes from the Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese and the CALLHOME Mandarin Corpus. We investigate the frequencies and
distributions of the Mandarin posture verbs 坐 zuò ‘sit’, 站 zhàn ‘stand’, and 躺 tǎng ‘lie’ in four construction types: directional constructions, aspectual
suffixes, serial verb constructions, and locative constructions. The analysis confirms the primacy of zuò, zhàn,
and tǎng and, among other results, reveals a significant absence of locative phrases with the dynamic forms of
the verbs as used with directionals.
Keywords: posture, corpus linguistics, cognitive linguistics, construction, motivation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 3.Cardinality of zuò, zhàn, and tǎng
- 4.Constructional usage
- 4.1Directionals
- 4.2Aspect
- 4.3Serial verb constructions
- 4.4Locatives
- 4.5Discussion of constructional usage
- 5.Directional x Locative
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Data availability
- Notes
References
References (33)
Abdulrahim, Dana. 2019. “go
constructions in Modern Standard Arabic: A corpus study”. Constructions and
Frames 111: 1–42.
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken
Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Fang, Yu Q. 1992. “动词助词 ‘了’ ‘着’ ‘过’
的语义特征及其用法比较 [The semantic features and usage comparisons of the dynamic
particles le, zhe, guò]”. 汉语学习 [Chinese
Studies] 11: 14–20.
. 2009. Statistics for Linguistics with R: A
Practical Introduction. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hinrichs, Lars, Nicholas Smith, and Birgit Waibel. 2007. The
part-of-speech-tagged ‘Brown’ corpora: A manual of information, including pointers for successful
use. Department of English, University of Freiburg, Germany. [URL]
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2010. Seven
events in three languages: Culture-specific conceptualizations and their pedagogical
implications. In Fostering Language Teaching Efficiency through
Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Sabine De Knop, Frank Boers, and Antoon De Rycker, 137–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jumaah, R. T., S. M. Rashid, M. Z. Abdul Jabar, and A. M. Ali. 2020. “The
English Verb See in Fiction Writing: A Cognitive Semantic Analysis”. Arab World English
Journal 111: 515–536.
Kinn, T., K. Blensenius, and P. Andersson. 2018. “Posture,
location, and activity in Mainland Scandinavian
pseudocoordinations”. CogniTextes 181. [URL].
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin
Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
McEnery, Anthony, and Zhonghua Xiao. 2004. “The
Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese: A corpus for monolingual and contrastive language
study”. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation
(LREC’04), 1175–1178. Lisbon, Portugal: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
Newman, John. 1998. The
Linguistics of Giving. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. (ed.). 2002. The
Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. (ed.) 2009. The
Linguistics of Eating and Drinking. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2022. “Experiential
motivation and the linguistics of sitting, standing, and lying”. WIREs Cognitive
Science 13(4).
Newman, John, and Sally Rice. 2001. “English
SIT, STAND, and LIE in small and large corpora”. ICAME
Journal 251: 109–133.
. 2004. “Patterns
of usage for English sit, stand, and lie: A cognitively-inspired exploration in corpus
linguistics”. Cognitive
Linguistics 151: 351–396.
R Core Team (2024). R: A language and
environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Radden, Günter. 1996. “Motion
metaphorized: The case of coming and going”. In Cognitive Linguistics
in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, ed. by E. H. Casad, 423–458. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Serra Borneto, C. 1996. “Liegen
and stehen in German: A study in horizontality and
verticality”. In Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion
of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, ed. by E. H. Casad, 459–505. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tai, James H-Y. 1985. “Temporal sequence and Chinese
word order”. In Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on
Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–6, 1983, ed. by John Haiman, 49–72. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Viberg, Åke. 2010. “Basic
verbs of possession: A contrastive and typological
study”. CogniTextes 41.
Völkel, Svenja, and Franziska Kretzschmar. 2021. Introducing
Linguistic Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Eye, Alexander. 1990. Introduction
to Configural Frequency Analysis: The Search for Types and Anti-types in
Cross-classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Eye, Alexander, and Wolfgang Wiedermann. 2003. Configural
Frequency Analysis: Foundations, Models, and Applications. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Wang, Wei H., and Hiroyuki Akitani. 2010. “汉语 ‘站立’义词的现状和历史 [Status and history of Chinese ‘stand’
words]”. 中国语文 [Chinese
Language] 41: 299–310.
Wheatley, Barbara. 1996. CALLHOME
Mandarin Chinese Transcripts LDC96T16. [URL]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
Willemsen, Jeroen. 2021. A
Grammar of Reta. PhD dissertation, Aarhus University.
