Cover not available

Article published In: The Joint Production of Conversational Turns
Edited by K.K. Luke and Mei Fang
[Chinese Language and Discourse 12:1] 2021
► pp. 52–83

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Collaborative assessments in Mandarin conversation

Syntax, prosody, and embodied action

 | Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Published online: 8 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00037.fan
Abstract
The co-production of a sentence is a phenomenon that is widely observed in talk-in-interaction across languages. However, with a few notable exceptions, there is still much room for the investigation of how the co-production of sentences is put to the service of specific actions and activities in different language communities. This paper, using 10 hours of video-recorded data, examines the co-production of assessments (“collaborative assessments”) in Mandarin conversation. It is found that speakers can use syntactic, prosodic, and bodily-visual devices to realize assessment collaboration, and that the functions of collaborative assessment include (1) helping provide a candidate assessment term and facilitating the assessment; (2) articulating/specifying ‘vague’ assessments; (3) helping complete the foreshadowing of a negative assessment term; and (4) co-participation in the assessment activity. This paper also discusses the design features of co-completion and subsequent responses on the basis of the continuum of speakers’ epistemic authority and agency in collaborative assessment sequences and concludes with some implications of this study for grammar as practice.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Collaborative assessment and its functions
    • 4.1Schemas of collaborative assessment
    • 4.2Interactional functions of collaborative assessments
      • 4.2.1Helping to provide a candidate assessment term and facilitating the assessment
      • 4.2.2Articulating/specifying ‘vague’ assessment
      • 4.2.3Helping to complete a foreshadowing negative assessment term
      • 4.2.4Co-participation in the assessment activity
  • 5.Responses to collaborative assessments
  • 6.Implications of this study
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Amiridze, Nino, Boyd H. Davis and Margaret Maclagan, eds. 2010. Fillers, Pauses and Placeholders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2002. “Projection in interaction and projection in grammar.” InLiSt – Interaction and Linguistic Structures 331 (December). [URL]
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2008. “On Assessing Situations and Events in Conversation: ‘Extraposition’ and Its Relatives.” Discourse Studies 10 (4): 443–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek, and Jonathan Potter. 2017. “Some Uses of Subject-Side Assessments.” Discourse Studies 19 (5): 497–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Di. 2018. “Assessment Formats in Mandarin Conversation.” Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference of Interactional Linguistics and Chinese Studies, Beijing, China, August 24–5, 2018
Fang, Mei 方梅. 2017. “Fumian pingjia de guiyuehua” 负面评价的规约化 [On conventionalization of negative assessment expressions]. Zhongguo yuwen 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2 (377): 131–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen. 1992. “The Interactional Achievement of a Sentence: Joint Productions in Therapeutic Discourse.” Discourse Process 151: 207–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecillia E., Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2003. “Social Interaction and Grammar.” In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 21., ed. by Michael Tomasello, 119–44. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. “Between and Within: Alternative Treatments of Continuers and Assessments.” Human Studies 91: 205–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1987. “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.” IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Charles Goodwin and Alessandro Duranti, 147–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guan, Yue 关越. 2020. “Hanyu kouyu duihua zhong de jufa hezuogongjian yanjiu” 汉语口语对话中的句法合作共建研究 [Research on syntactic co-construction in Mandarin conversation]. PhD diss., Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guan, Yue 关越 and Mei Fang 方梅. 2020. “Hanyu duihua zhong de jufa gongjian xianxiang chutan” 汉语对话中的句法共建现象初探 [A preliminary study of syntactic collaborative construction in Mandarin conversations]. Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu 语言教学与研究 [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 3 (203): 60–9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 1999. “Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation.” Human Studies 22 (2): 475–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [URL].
Hayashi, Makoto, and Junko Mori. 2007. “Co-Construction in Japanese Revisited: We Do “Finish Each Other’s Sentences”.” Japanese/Korean Linguistics 71: 77–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2004. “Shared Syntax: The Grammar of Co-Constructions.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (8): 1315–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2002. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement. In The Language of Turn and Sequence ed. by Ceilia E. Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.),. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Epistemics in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 370–94. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2002. “Collaborative Turn Completion in Korean Conversation.” Language Research 38 (4): 1281–316.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1991. “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society 20 (3): 441–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. “On the “Semi-Permeable” Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 238–76. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004a. “Collaborative Turn Sequences.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 225–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [URL].
2004b. “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 151–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “On the Place of Hesitating in Delicate Formulations: A Turn Constructional Infrastructure for Collaborative Indiscretion.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, 95–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H., and Tomoyo Takagi. 1999. “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: A Co-Investigation of English and Japanese Grammatical Practices.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (1): 49–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoting 李晓婷. 2019a. “Duo motai hudong yu Hanyu duo motai hudong yanjiu” 多模态互动与汉语多模态互动研究 [Multimodal interaction and multimodal analysis of Chinese interaction]. Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu 语言教学与研究 [Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies] 41: 45–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoting. 2019b. “Embodied Completion of Assessment in Mandarin Conversation. Paper presented at the 16th International Pragmatics Conference, Hong Kong, China, June 9–14, 2019.
Local, John, and John Kelly. 1986. Projection and “Silences”: Notes on Phonetic and Conversational Structure. Human Studies 91: 185–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lv, Shuxiang 吕叔湘. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu ba bai ci 现代汉语八百词 [Eight hundred words in contemporary Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “What Can Conversation Tell Us About Syntax?” In Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes, ed. by Philip W. Davis, 213–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [URL].
Pomerantz, Anita. 1975. “Second Assessments: A Study of Some Features of Agreements/Disagreements.” PhD diss., Irvine: University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1978. “Compliment Responses: Notes on the Cooperation of Multiple Constraints”.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 79–112. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage. 2006. “The Epistemics of Social Relationships: Owning Grandchildren”.” Language in Society 35 (5): 677–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Volumes 1 & 21. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systemics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1984. “On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 28–52. Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2005. “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 381: 131–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. London: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiggins, Sally, and Jonathan Potter. 2003. Attitudes and Evaluative Properties: Category vs. Item and Subjective vs. Objective Constructions in Everyday Food Assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology 421: 513–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xian, Lixia 鲜丽霞. 2012. “Hanyu ziran huihua di er pingjia yanjiu” 汉语自然会话第二评价研究 [Study on second assessment in Chinese conversation]. PhD diss., Chengdu: Sichuan University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xian, Lixia 鲜丽霞, and Li Lei 雷莉. 2014. “Hanyu ziranhuihua chengzan xingwei dayingyu yanjiu” 汉语自然会话称赞行为应答语研究 [Research on responses to compliment actions in Chinese spontaneous conversation]. Sichuan shifan daxue xuebao (shehui kexueban) 四川师范大学学报（社会科学版） [Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Sciences Edition)]. 41 (6): 96–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yue, Yao 乐耀. 2011. “Cong ‘bushi wo shuo ni’ lei huayu biaoji de xingcheng kan huahua zhong zhuguanxing fanchou yu yuyong yuanze de hudong” 从“不是我说你”类话语标记的形成看会话中主观性范畴与语用原则的互动 [The interaction between subjectivity and pragmatic principles in Chinese conversation viewed from the formation of discourse marker: A case study on the phrase ‘bú shi wǒ shuō nǐ’]. Shijie Hanyu jiaoxue 世界汉语教学 [Chinese Teaching in the World]. 32 (2): 69–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Cong hudong jiaoji de shijiao kan rangbu tonglei yushi pingjia lichang de biaoda” 从互动交际的视角看让步类同语式评价立场的表达 [Stance-taking of the concessive tautology in Mandarin conversation]. Zhongguo yuwen 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1 (370): 58–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi 朱德熙. 1956. “Xiandai Hanyu xingrongci yanjiu” 现代汉语形容词研究 [Study on adjectives in contemporary Chinese]. Yuyan yanjiu 语言研究 [Studies in Language] 11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. Yufa jiangyi 语法讲义 [Notes on grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sun, Minghui & Robert W. Schrauf
2025. “Shortlisting candidates”: Syntactically incomplete turns in assessments of absent third parties. Journal of Pragmatics 250 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue