Article published In: The Joint Production of Conversational Turns
Edited by K.K. Luke and Mei Fang
[Chinese Language and Discourse 12:1] 2021
► pp. 109–134
Syntactic parallelism and the co-production of syntactic units in Mandarin Chinese
Published online: 21 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00036.gao
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00036.gao
Abstract
Cross-linguistic studies on co-production of syntactic units and compound sentence formats have found that the
location of predicates affects the projectability of the language, in that languages like English allow early projections while
languages like Japanese later projections. In Mandarin Chinese, we found that syntactic parallelism often occurs before
co-constructions, impacting the projectability of syntactic structures in one way or another. Based on the theories of dialogic
syntax ( 2007. “The Stance
Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed.
by R. Englebretson, 139–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. , 2014. “Towards a Dialogic
Syntax.” Cognitive
Linguistics 25 (3): 359–410. ) and the
principles of interactional linguistics, this study explores the relationship between syntactic parallelism and co-production of
syntactic structures across turns. The co-production of four syntactic and sentential structures were closely examined, namely,
Copula V + Complement, (be) Adjectival Predicate, the conditional IF X THEN
Y construction (如果
ruguo……就/会 jiu/hui……), and compound
sentences with to-clause of purpose. Also observed is the emergent new sequence as interactionally relevant
syntax. Upon inspection, we found that turn units with parallel syntactic structures may help narrow down the category of the
projected final component, thus inspiring the second speaker to come in early and jointly complete the syntax-in-progress. Apart
from co-producing syntax-in-progress, co-produced structures can also develop into interactionally relevant sequences with
independent internal structures, thereby executing new social actions.
Article outline
- 1.The notion of co-production and studies on co-production
- 1.1Co-production as joint contribution
- 1.2Pattern of co-production
- 2.Projectability and syntactic parallelism
- 2.1Projectability
- 2.2Syntactic parallelism
- 3.Method and data
- 4.Co-producing Copula V + Complement
- 5.Co-producing (be) Adjectival predicate
- 6.Co-constructing IF X THEN Y
- 7.Compound format with subordinate clause of purpose
- 8.Emergent new sequence as interactionally relevant syntax
- 9.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (39)
Bertrand, Roxane, and Beatrice Priego-Valverde. 2017. “Listing
Practice in French Conversation: From Collaborative Achievement to Interactional
Convergence.” Discours 201: 3–33.
Brône, Geert, and Elisabeth Zima. 2014. “Towards
a Dialogic Construction Grammar: Ad hoc Routines and Resonance
Activation.” Cognitive
Linguistics 25 (3): 457–95.
Chao, Yuen Ren. (1968) 2011. A Grammar of Spoken
Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Reprint, Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Couper-Kulen, Elizabeth, and Tsuyoshi Ono. 2007. “‘Incrementing’
in Conversation: A Comparison of Practices in English, German and
Japanese.” Pragmatics 17: 4. 513–52.
Du Bois, John W. 1991. “Transcription Design Principles
for Spoken Discourse
Research.” Pragmatics 11: 71–106.
2007. “The Stance
Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed.
by R. Englebretson, 139–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fang, Di, and Yue, Guan. 2019. “Collaborative
Assessment in Mandarin Conversation: Syntax, Prosody, and Embodied Action.” Paper presented at
the 16th International Pragmatics Conference, Hong Kong,
China, June 9–14, 2019.
Fang, Mei 方梅. 2012. “Huihua
jiegou yu lianci de fuxianyi” 会话结构与连词的浮现义 [Discourse structure and emergent meaning of
conjunctions]. Zhongguo yuwen 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese
Language] 351 (6): 500–8.
Ferrara, Kathleen. 1992. “The
Interactive Achievement of a Sentence: Joint Productions in Therapeutic Discourse.” Discourse
Processes 15 (2). 207–28.
Fox, Barbara A., Makoto Hayashi, and Robert Jasperson. 1996. “Resources
and Repair: A Cross-linguistic Study of Syntax and
Repair.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed.
by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra. A. Thompson, 185–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goebel, Zane. 2021. “Alignment
and Affiliation.” In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic
Anthropology, ed. by James Stanlaw, 1–6. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Guardiola, Mathilde, and Roxane Bertrand. 2013. “Interactional
Convergence in Conversational Storytelling: When Reported Speech is a Cue of Alignment and/or
Affiliation.” Frontiers in
Psychology 41: 1–17.
Hayashi, Makoto. 2001. “Postposition-initiated
Utterances in Japanese Conversation: An Interactional Account of a Grammatical
Practice. In Studies in Interactional
Linguistics, ed. by M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen, 317–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2003. Joint
Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Studies in Discourse and Grammar
12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kim, Haeyeon. 2002. “Collaborative
Turn Completion in Korean Conversations.” Language
Research 38 (4): 1281–316.
1996. “On the ‘Semi-permeable’
Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another
Speaker.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed.
by Elinor Ochs, Emmanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra. A. Thompson. 238–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2004. “Collaborative Turn
Sequences.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First
Generation, ed. by G. Lerner. 225–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lerner, Gene H., and Tomoko Takagi. 1999. “On
the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-interaction: A Co-Investigation of English and Japanese
Grammatical Practices.” Journal of
Pragmatics 31 (1): 49–75.
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin
Chinese: A Functional Reference
Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Luke, Kang Kwong. 2019. “On the Collaborative
Production of TCUs in Mandarin Conversation.” Paper presented at
the 16th International Pragmatics Conference, Hong Kong,
China, June 9–14, 2019.
Minami, Fujio. 1964. “Hukubun” [Complex
sentences]. In Koogo bunpoo no
mondaiten [Problems concerning colloquial
grammar], ed. by Kenji Morioka, Ken Nagano, Yutaka Miyaji and Takashi Ichikawa, 71–89. Kooza gendaigo [Modern language
lectures] 61. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
Mithun, Marianne. 2014. “Syntactic
and Prosodic Structures, Segmentation, Integration, and in
Between.” In Spoken Corpora and Linguistics
Studies, ed. by Tommaso Raso and Heliana Mello. 297–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Obana, Yasuko, and Michael Haugh. 2015. “Co-authorship
of Joint Utterances in Japanese.” Dialogue and
Discourse 6 (1): 1–25.
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1995. “What
Can Conversation Tell Us about Syntax?” In Alternative Linguistics:
Descriptive and theoretical modes, ed. by Philip W. Davis. 213–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ono, Tsuyoshi and Ritva Laury. 2019. “Co-construction
as Over-syntacticization of Interaction.” Paper presented at
the 16th International Pragmatics Conference, Hong Kong,
China, June 9–14, 2019.
. 1995. Lectures
on Conversation, Volumes I & II. Ed. by Gail Jefferson, with
an introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell. First
published as two volumes 1992.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A
Simplest Systemics for the Organization of Turn-taking for
Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Turn Organization: One
Intersection of Grammar and Interaction. In Interaction and
Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra. A. Thompson. 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance,
Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of
Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 41 (1): 31–57.
Szatrowski, Polly. 2002. “Syntactic
Projectability and Co-participant Completion in Japanese Conversation.” Annual Meeting of the
Berkeley Linguistic
Society 28 (1) 315–25.
Thompson, Sandra A., and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2005. “The
Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction.” Discourse
Studies 7 (4/5): 481–505.
