Cover not available

Article published In: Conversation Analysis in Chinese: Part II
Edited by Ni-Eng Lim
[Chinese Language and Discourse 10:2] 2019
► pp. 187–223

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

What are speakers doing when they pretend to be uncertain?

Actions with non-committal epistemic stance in Mandarin Conversation

 | University of California, Los Angeles
Published online: 15 January 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00017.zho
Abstract
This paper investigates conversational actions accomplished by a knowing speaker who takes a non-committal epistemic stance using epistemic adverbs expressing uncertainty in Mandarin conversations. This study finds that adverbs of uncertainty such as keneng, yexu, and dagai, are used predominantly by knowing speakers, rather than unknowing speakers in Mandarin conversations. Moreover, most of these epistemically incongruent cases occur in sequence-initiating actions. Three most common practices are announcements involved in a request project, announcements of self-related positive news, and advice-giving actions. Adverbs of uncertainty are less frequently used by knowing speakers to take a non-committal stance in the sequence-responsive actions. A common practice observed is responses to information-seeking questions that have negative valence. Adverbs of uncertainty are adopted by knowing speakers to minimize disaffiliation caused by these dispreferred actions such as requests, self-praising of accomplishments, advice-giving, and informing with negative valence.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of key concepts
    • 2.1Action in interaction
    • 2.2Non-committal stance and epistemic adverbs expressing uncertainty
    • 2.3Defining a knowing speaker: Epistemic stance and epistemic status in Conversation Analysis
  • 3.Methods and data
    • 3.1Methods
    • 3.2Data
  • 4.Findings and discussion
    • 4.1Overview
      • 4.1.1Who is taking non-committal stances with adverbs of uncertainty?
      • 4.1.2Sequence position of non-committal stances
    • 4.2Sequence-initiating actions with non-committal stance
      • 4.2.1Announcement in a request project
      • 4.2.2Announcement of self-related positive future events
      • 4.2.3Giving advice
    • 4.3Actions accomplished with non-committal epistemic stance in responsive actions
  • 5.Concluding discussion
  • References
References (51)
References
Aikhenvald, Aleksandra IUrevna, et al. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ann Weatherall. (2011). I don’t know as a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge, Research on Language & Social Interaction, 44:4, 317–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. “How to do things with words: The William James lectures.” Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. “Longman grammar of spoken and written English.” 89–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2006. “Stance in spoken and written university registers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (2): 97–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, Stephen C. Levinson, and Stephen C. Levinson. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Vol. 41. Cambridge university press, 1987. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing.” Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology 201. 261–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting.” Research on language and social interaction 41.2. 129–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, Tomoko Koike. 2010. Expressing stance in Mandarin conversation: Epistemic and non-epistemic uses of wo juede. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1980. “Conversational mitigation.” Journal of pragmatics 4.4. 341–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine. 2006. “Will you or can’t you? Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38.7. 1081–1104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, CL. 2005. “Modal verbs and modal adverbs in Chinese: An investigation into the semantic source.” UST Working Papers in Linguistics, Graduate Institute of Linguistics 1, no. National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. “Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry.” Language in society 271, no. 31 (1998): 291–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.” Social psychology quarterly 68.1. 15–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. “Aspects of recipient design in expert advice-giving on call-in radio.” Discourse processes 19, no. 2 (1995): 219–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi, and Foong Ha Yap. 2015. “Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages.” Journal of Pragmatics 831. 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kinnell, Ann Marie K., and Douglas W. Maynard. “The delivery and receipt of safer sex advice in pretest counseling sessions for HIV and AIDS.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24, no. 4 (1996): 405–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leppanen, V. (1998). The straightforwardness of advice: Advice-giving in interactions between Swedish district nurses and patients. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(2), 209–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Wei, and Yue Li. “My stupid wife and ugly daughter’: the use of pejorative references as a politeness strategy by Chinese speakers.” Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 7, no. 3–4 (1996): 129–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, Ni-Eng. 2011. “From subjectivity to intersubjectivity: Epistemic marker wo juede in Chinese.” Current issues in Chinese linguistics, 265–300.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1984. “Modifying illocutionary force.” Journal of pragmatics 8, no. 3. 345–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1994. “The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 21, no. 1. 67–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2013. “Action formation and ascription.” In The handbook of conversation analysis, 103–130. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 1980. “Xiandai hanyu babai ci [Eight hundred words in modern Chinese].” Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. “Semantics (vols i & ii).” Cambridge CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, J., & Auwera, J. van der. 2016. The Oxford handbook of modality and mood.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. “Modality: Overview and linguistic issues.” The expression of modality 1261 (2006).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1993. “Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective.” Research on language and social interaction 26, no. 3. 287–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1978. “Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints.” Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 79–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1980. “Telling my side:“Limited access’ as a “fishing” device.” Sociological inquiry 50, no. 3–4. 186–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped.” Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. and Heritage, J. 2013. Preference. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (eds J. Sidnell and T. Stivers). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pudlinski, C. (2005). The mitigation of advice. Calling for help: Language and social interaction in telephone helplines, 1431, 109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (2013). Overall structural organization. The handbook of conversation analysis, 257–280.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: a primer in conversation analysis. Igarss 2014.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Vol. 6261. Cambridge university press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in society, 5(1), 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheng, Lichun. 2008. “大概”,“也许” 和 “恐怕” 的语义, 语用分析 [Semantic meanings and Pragmatic Analysis of ‘dagai’ ‘yexu’ ‘kongpa’]“.” Chinese Language Learning. no. 1. 45–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, eds. 2011. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Vol. 291. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2003. “从语音, 语法和话语特征看 “知道” 格式在谈话中的演化 [Phonological, grammatical, and discourse evidence for the emergence of zhidao constructions].” Chinese Language 41. 291–302.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Disputed memory and the social interactive functions of remembering/forgetting expressions in Mandarin conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 1061. 184–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. “A conversation analysis of self-praising in everyday Mandarin interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 43, no. 13 (2011): 3152–3176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Bei. 2016. “汉语认识情态表达“可能” “也许” “大概” “恐怕”用法对比分析 [A comparative study on Chinese epistemic modals ‘keneng’ ‘kexu’ ‘dagai’]‘kongpa’.” Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. 27, no. 6. 33–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Ying, and Foong Ha Yap. 2015. “I am sure but I hedge”: Fear expression kǒngpà as an interactive rhetorical strategy in Mandarin broadcast talk.” Journal of Pragmatics 831. 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

He, Shuang, Ling Zhou & Shaojie Zhang
2025. Stance-taking and (inter)subjective roles of Mandarin zhende (ma/a). Lingua 323 ► pp. 103951 ff. DOI logo
Rafaely, Daniella, Sonto Madonsela & Maria Marchetti-Mercer
2023. Licence to leave: the 'had-to' device as a method for producing normative accounts of migration. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 41:3 ► pp. 350 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue